1700080263
（The merchant inhabitants of Bremen will not be obligated for the campaign of the archbishop of Bremen unless they will have desired to be, with the exception of those merchants who either as officials or as men of the Church have been enfeoffed by the Church, of which each one called out for the campaign of the Church will be able to fulfill his obligation through one man suitably equipped with arms.）
1700080264
1700080265
See Donandt, History of the Bremen Municipal Law（Geschichte des Bremer Stadtrechts），1：111.
1700080266
1700080267
4.H.Fischer，“The Participation of the Free Cities in the Imperial Campaign”（“Die Teilnahme der Reichsstädte an der Reichsheerfahrt”），Leipzig dissertation，1883，p.14. The first march to Rome in which they actually participated, of course, did not occur until 1310. P.29.
1700080268
1700080269
5.Lindt，“Contributions to the History of German Military Organization in the Hohenstaufen Period”（“Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Kriegsverfassung in der Staufischen Zeit”），Tübingen dissertation，1881，p.28，cites several passages for this point, the earliest being from the year 1114.
1700080270
1700080271
6.1204“collecta multitudine militum vel etiam civium, qui propter continuas bellorum exercitationes gladiis et sagittis et lanceis non parum praevalent”（“after a crowd of knights and even inhabitants had been assembled, who, on account of their continuous military exercises with swords, arrows, and lances, were sufficiently capable …”）.
1700080272
1700080273
7.Arnold，2：241.
1700080274
1700080275
8.Ennen and Eckertz, Sources for the History of the City of Cologne（Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Köln），Vol.II, No.449，p.165，and Vol.IV, No.488，p.560. See also 3：232.Arnold, Constitutional History of the German Free Cities（Verfassungsgeschichte der deutschen Freistädte），1：443.
1700080276
1700080277
9.Arnold，2：243.
1700080278
1700080279
10.“Not many of the gentlemen joined me, since they were anxious to be able to return home again on the same day and could not remain out overnight.”Königshofen, Chronik deutscher Städte（Chronicle of German Cities），9.845. Vischer, Studies in German History（Forschungen der deutschen Geschichte）2：77. Köhler，3：2：381.
1700080280
1700080281
11.Master Godefrit Hagen, city clerk for the period, Rhymed Chronicle of the City of Cologne from the Thirteenth Century（Reimchronik der Stadt Köln aus dem dreizehnten Jahrhundert）. With notes and glossary in accordance with the only ancient manuscript. Edited completely for the first time by E.von Groote, city councilor, Cologne on the Rhine. Published and printed by M. Du Mont-Schauberg.1834.
1700080282
1700080283
12.This document is printed in the Fontes rerum Germanicarum（Sources of German History），by Böhmer, Vol.III, and recently edited by Jaffé in the SS.，17.105. See also Wiegand, Bellum Walterianum（Studies in Alsatian History[Studien zur Elsässischen Geschichte]，I），Strasbourg，1878. Roth von Schreckenstein, Herr Walter von Geroldseck, Tübingen，1857.
1700080284
1700080285
13.Roth, p.40，assumes that the bishop had distributed his men throughout the region up to about Schlettstadt, Rheinau, Zabern, and Hagenau. Some of these points are more than 18 miles distant from the assembly point at Molsheim.
1700080286
1700080287
According to Richer, the bishop’s troops had not initially assembled but were concentrated at Dachenstein.
1700080288
1700080289
14.From Closener’s translation. The Latin text reads: “Bene veniatis, dilectissime domine Zorn; nunquam in tantum desiderabam vos videre.”
1700080290
1700080291
7 条顿骑士团征服普鲁士
1700080292
1700080293
1.The best comprehensive account is that of Karl Lohmeyer, Geschichte von Ost-und Westpreussen，1st Section，2d ed.，1881. The work of A.L. Ewald, The Conquest of Prussia by the Germans（Die Eroberung Preussens durch die Deutschen），four volumes，1882-1886，is based on a variety of sources. The second great rebellion by the Prussians is treated thoroughly and well by Köhler in the second volume of his Development of Military Organization and Conduct of War in the Knightly Period（Entwickelung des Kriegswesens und der Kriegführung in der Ritterzeit）.
1700080294
1700080295
2.Whether the remark, from Dusburg or the chronicle of Oliva, that the order numbered 600 lay members in 1239 is reliable cannot be determined.
1700080296
1700080297
8 英格兰箭术与爱德华一世征服威尔士和苏格兰
1700080298
1700080299
1.Slingers, fundibularii, are mentioned in Continuatio Reginonis（Continuation of Regino）for the year 962. Casus Sancti Galli Continuatio（Continuation of the Chronicle of St. Gall），158.
1700080300
1700080301
2.See Jähns, History of the Development of Ancient Offensive Weapons（Entwickelungsgeschichte der alten Trutzwaffen），p.333 ff.
1700080302
1700080303
3.In Jaffé，Regesta pontificum Romanorum（Register of the Roman Popes），p.585，the decision（No.29）reads as follows: “artem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri sub anathemate prohibent.”（“They prohibited, on pain of damnation, the skill of crossbowmen and archers to be exercised against Christians and Catholics.”）On the basis of this Regesta, we find it stated quite often（for example, in Demmin, Military Weapons [Kriegswaffen]，2d ed.，p.100，and also Waitz，8：190）that the council had forbidden the use of the crossbow among Christians as too deadly a weapon. Since the sagittarii（archers）are mentioned in a line with the ballistarii（crossbowmen），that cannot possibly have been the intent of the council. In Mansi, Tome 21，p.534，the decision reads as follows: “Artem autem illam mortiferam et Deo odibilem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri de caetero sub anathemate prohibemus.”（“We prohibit, however, on pain of damnation, that deadly skill of crossbowmen and archers, odious to God, to be practiced by another against Christians and Catholics.”）Hefele, Concil. Geschichte, Vol.V，2d ed.，p.442，interprets this as referring to a kind of tournament of competitive shooting at persons. San Marte, p.188，claims that it refers to poisoned arrows and bolts. I prefer Hefele’s interpretation.
1700080304
1700080305
4.Guillemus Brito, Gesta Philippi regis（William the Briton, Deeds of Philip the King），Book II：
1700080306
1700080307
Francigenis nostris illis ignota diebus
1700080308
1700080309
Res erat omnino, quid Balestarius arcus
1700080310
1700080311
Quid Balista foret.
1700080312
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.700080263e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]