1700088980
1700088981
10.See also above, p.263，and below, p.292.
1700088982
1700088983
11.Livy 29.9.4. Valerius Maximus 2.7.4. Frontinus, Strategemetos 4.1.30-31.“Cotta consul P. Aurelium sanguine sibi junctum, quern obsidioni Lipararum, ipse ad auspicia repetenda Messanam transiturus, praefecerat, cum agger incensus et capta castra essent, virgis caesum in numerum gregalium peditum referri et muneribus fungi jussit.”（“When the consul Cotta was on the point of going to Messana to take the auspices again, he placed in command of the blockade of the Liparian Islands a certain Publius Aurelius who was related to him by blood. But when the latter’s line of blockade was burned and his camp was captured, Cotta ordered him to be flogged, reduced to the ranks, and to perform the tasks of a common soldier.”）
1700088984
1700088985
4 皮洛士 无
1700088986
1700088987
5 第一次布匿战争
1700088988
1700088989
1.Unger, Rheinisches Museum 34：102.von Scala, Römische Studien（a complimentary greeting from Innsbruck to the 42d Assembly of German Philologues，1893），showed that it was probable that Naevius, too, who did not write until he had reached an advanced age, had already used Philinus.
1700088990
1700088991
2.Very enlightening on this point is W. Soltau in Neues Jahrbuch für Philologie 154（1896）：164.
1700088992
1700088993
第五篇 第二次布匿战争
1700088994
1700088995
1 第二次布匿战争的研究方法
1700088996
1700088997
1.This opinion has, moreover, already been expressed by another writer, Unger in Rheinisches Museum 34：97.
1700088998
1700088999
2 坎尼会战
1700089000
1700089001
1. The average depth was naturally considerably smaller, since the intervals, which had become irregular during the approach march, had to be filled up before the impact with the enemy by having rearward troops spring forward. In earlier editions I still admitted the possibility of a doubled length with correspondingly lesser depth. But I have now become convinced that a front of nearly 2 kilometers would no longer have been capable of forward movement in orderly fashion. One can grasp this more clearly by imagining a street like “Unter den Linden” in Berlin, which is almost 1 kilometer long and about 90 paces wide. The Roman infantry front at Cannae would therefore have reached about from the monument of Frederick the Great to the Wilhelmstrasse and would have overflowed to some extent in its depth the width of this street.
1700089002
1700089003
2.Polybius says that the Iberian and Gallic cavalry were on the left flank, the Numidians on the right, and he later characterizes the fighting of the latter as simple skirmishing.In the battle on the Trebia he makes a distinction between the heavy cavalry and the Numidians. By that account, then, the Iberian cavalry were the heavy units—a fact that does not necessarily eliminate the possibility of Hannibal’s also having had African cuirassiers, only a potiori may the light cavalry have been called the Numidian.
1700089004
1700089005
3 第二次布匿战争的基本战略问题
1700089006
1700089007
1.Polybius 3.89.9.
1700089008
1700089009
2.I am not adding any for the fleet, since at this time they would have left very few Roman citizens aboard ship. Since there was no real sea war taking place, they were able to provide the crews from allies and slaves（except for the one fleet legion）.
1700089010
1700089011
3.Livy 34.50.
1700089012
1700089013
4.Livy，37.60.
1700089014
1700089015
5.I do not see fit to agree with the idea that fear of the wild Gauls, who formed such a large percentage of the Punic army, caused the Italians to adhere to Rome; for the defections increased continuously in the years 210 and 211 B.C.，although that fear, to whatever extent it existed, must have been getting stronger and stronger.
1700089016
1700089017
6. The numerous victories that the Romans are supposed to have won from Hannibal from 216 to 203 B.C. according to Livy, were, as is so excellently explained by W. Streit in On the History of the Second Punic War in Italy after the Battle of Cannae（Zur Geschichte des zweiten punischen Krieges in Italien nach der Schlacht bei Canna, Berlin，1887），patriotic Roman fantasies—frankly, pure lies. Very nicely was Streit able to add up that Hannibal is supposed to have lost 120，000 killed in all these battles from Cannae on. Where it was a question of larger battles, as at Herdoniae and Numistro, victory still went to the Carthaginians. The alleged victories of Marcellus at Nola turn out to be very insignificant engagements.
1700089018
1700089019
7.It is precisely this way that Polybius describes the situation（9.3-4）.
1700089020
1700089021
4 战前战略态势回顾
1700089022
1700089023
1. The Second Punic War and its Historical Sources, Polybius and Livy, Explained from Strategic-Tactical Viewpoints. The years 219 and 218 B.C, exclusive of the Crossing of the Alps. An Essay by Joseph Fuchs, Imperial and Royal Professor in Wiener-Neustadt.（Der zweite punische Krieg und seine Quellen Polybius und Livius nach strategisch-taktischen Gesichtspunkten beleuchtet. Die Jahre 219 und 218，mit Aus-schluss des Alpenüberganges. Ein Versuch von Joseph Fuchs, k.k. Professor in Wiener-Neustadt.）Wiener-Neustadt，1894. In Rom-mission bei: Carl Blumrich, Wiener-Neustadt; M. Perles, Wien; T. Thomas, Leipzig.
1700089024
1700089025
Hannibal’s Crossing of the Alps. Conclusions from Research and Travel, by Joseph Fuchs, Imperial and Royal Professor in Wiener-Neustadt. With two maps and one illustration.（Hannibal’s Alpenübergang. Ein Studien-und Reiseergebnis von Joseph Fuchs, k.k. Professor in Wiener-Neustadt. Mit zwei Karten und einer Abbil-dung.）Vienna, Carl Konegen，1897.
1700089026
1700089027
The question of which pass Hannibal used for his crossing of the Alps does not belong in the framework of this book, since no important strategic or tactical conclusions result from the variety of routes. Fuchs has decided on the Mont Genevre Pass. Konrad Lehmann in The Attacks of the Three Barcas Against Italy（Die Angriffe der drei Barkiden auf Italien），1905，has once again, with a very thorough argument, pointed to the Little Saint Bernard. Subsequently, French Captain of Engineers Colin, too, has appeared in this arena with a work entitled Hannibal in Gaul（Annibal en Gaule），1904. To date, none of the various theories has been able to win general acceptance.
1700089028
1700089029
5 罗马占据上风
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70008898e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]