1700092155
1700092156
Si alium serum Romanum sive barbarum aratorem aut porcarium XXX sol. solvat.”
1700092157
1700092158
（“If anyone should have killed a barbarian slave selected for service at court or for military service, he would pay 60 solidi, and 12，moreover, as a fine.）
1700092159
1700092160
（“If anyone should have killed another slave, Roman or barbarian, farmer or swine-herd, he would pay 30 solidi.”）
1700092161
1700092162
In this case, then, we have the barbarian military serving man（Kriegsknecht）；the common servant（Knecht）can also be a Roman, but this is not possible for the military serving man.
1700092163
1700092164
2 战术变化
1700092165
1700092166
1.Aurel.Victor.，Chapter 21.
1700092167
1700092168
2.Ars veterinaria 6.（4.）6. The horses of the Thuringians were also praised by Jordanes 1.3.21.
1700092169
1700092170
3.De bell.Vand.1.8.
1700092171
1700092172
4.Procopius, de bell. Vand.2.14.
1700092173
1700092174
5.Schmidt, Geschichte der Vandalen, p.39.
1700092175
1700092176
6.Procopius, bell. Goth.1.16；1.28；1.29.bell. Pers.2.18.
1700092177
1700092178
7.Brunner, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung（1887）：6.
1700092179
1700092180
8.For example，3.28；4.30；8.45；9.31.
1700092181
1700092182
9.Procopius 2.25. Agathias 2.5. Whether Procopius’statement here is entirely reliable must be considered doubtful, since he completely denies that the Franks used both the spear and the bow, weapons which many other sources indicate they had. Waitz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte 2：528；2d edition，2：213. If Procopius’report is at all correct, there may have been some unusual circumstance or other, as in 552，when the invaders were principally Alamanni, whom we elsewhere find to be specifically famous as cavalry.
1700092183
1700092184
10.Jähns, Geschichte der Kriegswissenschaften 1：142.
1700092185
1700092186
11.Oeuvres 28：163.
1700092187
1700092188
12.Napoleon used very similar expressions in his regulations for the training of dragoons, as cited by Kerchnawe, Kavallerie-Verwendung, p.3，note.
1700092189
1700092190
13.In Procopius, bell. Pers.1.14. Belisarius describes the Persian infantry as follows: “All the infantry is nothing else than a crowd of pitiful rustics who come to the army for no other purpose than to undermine a wall, to strip the dead, or to perform other services for the soldiers.”*
1700092191
1700092192
14.The reader’s attention is called to the citation already analyzed above, Procopius, de bell. Vand.1.18，where it is recounted how the Vandals came neither in order nor formed for battle, but “They went in symmoriai, and these were small—about thirty, or in fact, twenty men.”* Those could have been such diminished clans.
1700092193
1700092194
15. The ango has some similarity to the Roman pilum, and so it can be considered as a javelin.
1700092195
1700092196
16.Rüstow, in Heerwesen Cäsars, p.25，assumes that on the average the cavalry was one-fourth as strong as the legionary infantry, thus forming 20 percent of the army. Marquardt, in Römische Staatsverfassung 2：441，agrees with this point. Fröhlich, Kriegswesen Cäsars, p.40，rightly avoids considering this relationship as an average. Of the numbers reported in the sources，20 percent is not an average but the maximum.
1700092197
1700092198
3 初期日耳曼-古罗马军事体系的衰落
1700092199
1700092200
1.Some of the codes call for half of all the serving men instead of a tenth.
1700092201
1700092202
2.Könige der Germanen 6：222，2d edition.
1700092203
1700092204
4 封建制度的起源
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.700092155e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]