1700096560
（The merchant inhabitants of Bremen will not be obligated for the campaign of the archbishop of Bremen unless they will have desired to be, with the exception of those merchants who either as officials or as men of the Church have been enfeoffed by the Church, of which each one called out for the campaign of the Church will be able to fulfill his obligation through one man suitably equipped with arms.）
1700096561
1700096562
See Donandt, History of the Bremen Municipal Law（Geschichte des Bremer Stadtrechts），1：111.
1700096563
1700096564
4.H.Fischer，“The Participation of the Free Cities in the Imperial Campaign”（“Die Teilnahme der Reichsstädte an der Reichsheerfahrt”），Leipzig dissertation，1883，p.14. The first march to Rome in which they actually participated, of course, did not occur until 1310. P.29.
1700096565
1700096566
5.Lindt，“Contributions to the History of German Military Organization in the Hohenstaufen Period”（“Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Kriegsverfassung in der Staufischen Zeit”），Tübingen dissertation，1881，p.28，cites several passages for this point, the earliest being from the year 1114.
1700096567
1700096568
6.1204“collecta multitudine militum vel etiam civium, qui propter continuas bellorum exercitationes gladiis et sagittis et lanceis non parum praevalent”（“after a crowd of knights and even inhabitants had been assembled, who, on account of their continuous military exercises with swords, arrows, and lances, were sufficiently capable …”）.
1700096569
1700096570
7.Arnold，2：241.
1700096571
1700096572
8.Ennen and Eckertz, Sources for the History of the City of Cologne（Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Köln），Vol.II, No.449，p.165，and Vol.IV, No.488，p.560. See also 3：232.Arnold, Constitutional History of the German Free Cities（Verfassungsgeschichte der deutschen Freistädte），1：443.
1700096573
1700096574
9.Arnold，2：243.
1700096575
1700096576
10.“Not many of the gentlemen joined me, since they were anxious to be able to return home again on the same day and could not remain out overnight.”Königshofen, Chronik deutscher Städte（Chronicle of German Cities），9.845. Vischer, Studies in German History（Forschungen der deutschen Geschichte）2：77. Köhler，3：2：381.
1700096577
1700096578
11.Master Godefrit Hagen, city clerk for the period, Rhymed Chronicle of the City of Cologne from the Thirteenth Century（Reimchronik der Stadt Köln aus dem dreizehnten Jahrhundert）. With notes and glossary in accordance with the only ancient manuscript. Edited completely for the first time by E.von Groote, city councilor, Cologne on the Rhine. Published and printed by M. Du Mont-Schauberg.1834.
1700096579
1700096580
12.This document is printed in the Fontes rerum Germanicarum（Sources of German History），by Böhmer, Vol.III, and recently edited by Jaffé in the SS.，17.105. See also Wiegand, Bellum Walterianum（Studies in Alsatian History[Studien zur Elsässischen Geschichte]，I），Strasbourg，1878. Roth von Schreckenstein, Herr Walter von Geroldseck, Tübingen，1857.
1700096581
1700096582
13.Roth, p.40，assumes that the bishop had distributed his men throughout the region up to about Schlettstadt, Rheinau, Zabern, and Hagenau. Some of these points are more than 18 miles distant from the assembly point at Molsheim.
1700096583
1700096584
According to Richer, the bishop’s troops had not initially assembled but were concentrated at Dachenstein.
1700096585
1700096586
14.From Closener’s translation. The Latin text reads: “Bene veniatis, dilectissime domine Zorn; nunquam in tantum desiderabam vos videre.”
1700096587
1700096588
7 条顿骑士团征服普鲁士
1700096589
1700096590
1.The best comprehensive account is that of Karl Lohmeyer, Geschichte von Ost-und Westpreussen，1st Section，2d ed.，1881. The work of A.L. Ewald, The Conquest of Prussia by the Germans（Die Eroberung Preussens durch die Deutschen），four volumes，1882-1886，is based on a variety of sources. The second great rebellion by the Prussians is treated thoroughly and well by Köhler in the second volume of his Development of Military Organization and Conduct of War in the Knightly Period（Entwickelung des Kriegswesens und der Kriegführung in der Ritterzeit）.
1700096591
1700096592
2.Whether the remark, from Dusburg or the chronicle of Oliva, that the order numbered 600 lay members in 1239 is reliable cannot be determined.
1700096593
1700096594
8 英格兰箭术与爱德华一世征服威尔士和苏格兰
1700096595
1700096596
1.Slingers, fundibularii, are mentioned in Continuatio Reginonis（Continuation of Regino）for the year 962. Casus Sancti Galli Continuatio（Continuation of the Chronicle of St. Gall），158.
1700096597
1700096598
2.See Jähns, History of the Development of Ancient Offensive Weapons（Entwickelungsgeschichte der alten Trutzwaffen），p.333 ff.
1700096599
1700096600
3.In Jaffé，Regesta pontificum Romanorum（Register of the Roman Popes），p.585，the decision（No.29）reads as follows: “artem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri sub anathemate prohibent.”（“They prohibited, on pain of damnation, the skill of crossbowmen and archers to be exercised against Christians and Catholics.”）On the basis of this Regesta, we find it stated quite often（for example, in Demmin, Military Weapons [Kriegswaffen]，2d ed.，p.100，and also Waitz，8：190）that the council had forbidden the use of the crossbow among Christians as too deadly a weapon. Since the sagittarii（archers）are mentioned in a line with the ballistarii（crossbowmen），that cannot possibly have been the intent of the council. In Mansi, Tome 21，p.534，the decision reads as follows: “Artem autem illam mortiferam et Deo odibilem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri de caetero sub anathemate prohibemus.”（“We prohibit, however, on pain of damnation, that deadly skill of crossbowmen and archers, odious to God, to be practiced by another against Christians and Catholics.”）Hefele, Concil. Geschichte, Vol.V，2d ed.，p.442，interprets this as referring to a kind of tournament of competitive shooting at persons. San Marte, p.188，claims that it refers to poisoned arrows and bolts. I prefer Hefele’s interpretation.
1700096601
1700096602
4.Guillemus Brito, Gesta Philippi regis（William the Briton, Deeds of Philip the King），Book II：
1700096603
1700096604
Francigenis nostris illis ignota diebus
1700096605
1700096606
Res erat omnino, quid Balestarius arcus
1700096607
1700096608
Quid Balista foret.
1700096609
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70009656e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]