1700141180
[100]Clark,ed.,Sir William Temple’s Observations Upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands,一个世纪之后，詹姆斯·鲍斯韦尔（James Boswell）在访问共和国之前阅读了这本书。E.A.Pottle,Boswell in Holland,1763–1764,London
:Heinemann,1952,pp.280-281.
1700141181
1700141182
[101]Schama,Embarrassment of Riches,pp.284-285;Clark,ed.,Sir William Temple’s Observations Upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands,p.129.
1700141183
1700141184
[102]Clark,ed.,Sir William Temple’s Observations Upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands,pp.100,116-126.
1700141185
1700141186
[103]Israel,The Dutch Republic.p.780.
1700141187
1700141188
[104]Israel,The Dutch Republic.pp.776-785.
1700141189
1700141190
[105]转引自D.Onnekink,‘The Ideological Context of the Dutch War(1672)’,in D.On nekink and G.Rommelse,eds.,Ideology and Foreign Policy in Early Modern Europe(1650–1750),Farn ham
:Ashgate Press,p.133.
1700141191
1700141192
[106]Schama,Embarrassment of Riches,pp.260,271,
1700141193
1700141194
[107]S.T.Bindoff,The Scheldt Question to 1839,London
:Allen and Unwin,1945,pp.116,126,131;P.Sonnino,‘Colbert’,European Studies Review(January 1983),pp.1-11.
1700141195
1700141196
[108]F.S.Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,Zutphen
:Walberg Pers,2003.《荷兰东印度公司的历史》(Geschiedenis van de VoC)一书的英文版，第20页。
1700141197
1700141199
1700141200
[110]Clark,ed.,Sir William Temple’s Observations Upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands,pp.60,163,117.
1700141201
1700141202
[111]苏里南协会：是荷兰的一家私营公司，成立于1683年，负责管理和保卫荷兰共和国的殖民地苏里南。——译者注
1700141203
1700141204
[112]Burke,Venice and Amsterdam,pp.46-47.
1700141205
1700141206
[113]Brandon,War,Capital,and the Dutch State,pp.94-98,100-101,109.
1700141207
1700141208
[114]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.37-65.
1700141209
1700141210
[115]Rommelse,Downing,‘The Fleet as an Ideological Pillar of Dutch Radical Republicanism’,p.401;对“海洋自由论”的主张请见Hugo Grotius,The Freedom of the Seas or The Right which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade,New York
:Oxford University Press,1916,他认为各国都有权于各大海洋自由航行，无须经过任何国家的批准，反对西班牙、葡萄牙和英国对海洋主权的主张。反过来，他的意见又受到了约翰·塞尔登的批驳，塞尔登为英国的主张“海洋封闭论”做了辩护。
1700141211
1700141212
[116]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.60,81.
1700141213
1700141214
[117]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.132,148.
1700141215
1700141216
[118]J.A.de Moor,‘“A Very Unpleasant Relationship”
:Trade and Strategy in the Eastern Seas
:Anglo-Dutch Relations in the Nineteenth Century from a Colonial Perspective,’in G.J.A.Raven and N.A.M.Rodger,eds.,Navies and Armies
:The Anglo-Dutch Relationship in War and Peace 1688–1988,Edinburgh
:John Donald,1990,pp.49-69.
1700141217
1700141218
[119]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.166,171-172.
1700141219
1700141220
[120]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.23-31,171.
1700141221
1700141222
[121]Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.56 passim and p.164.
1700141223
1700141224
[122]H.W.Richmond,The Navy in India,1763–1783,London
:Ernest Benn,1931,pp.251-273;Gaastra,The Dutch East India Company
:Expansion and Decline,pp.166-710;C.N.Parkinson,War in the Eastern Seas,1793–1815,London
:Allen and Unwin,1954,pp.78-81.
1700141225
1700141226
[123]Rowen,John de Witt,pp.596,633.
1700141227
1700141228
[124]Rowen,John de Witt,p.781;Stephen B.Baxter,William III and the Defense of European Liberty 1650–1702,New York
:Harcourt,Brace,1966,pp.46-47.
1700141229
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70014118e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]