打字猴:1.70187936e+09
1701879360
1701879361 [13] Alan Rusbridger, “The Snowden Leaks and the Public,” New Yorker (November 21, 2013 Issue).
1701879362
1701879363 [14] David Runciman, The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis From World War I to the Present (Princeton University Press, 2013).
1701879364
1701879365 [15] David Runciman, “The trouble with democracy,” The Guardian (November 8, 2013).
1701879366
1701879367 [16] David Runciman, “Democracy’s Dual Dangers,” The Chronicle Review (November 18, 2013).。
1701879368
1701879369 [17] Francis Fukuyama, “The Decay of American Political Institutions,” The American Interest(December 8, 2013).
1701879370
1701879371 [18] Mark Lilla, “Arendt and Eichmann: The New Truth,” The New York Review of Books(November 21, 2013 Issue); “The Defense of a Jewish Collaborator,” The New York Review of Books (December 5, 2013 Issue).
1701879372
1701879373 [19] Mark Lilla, “Arendt and Eichmann: The New Truth”.
1701879374
1701879375 [20] Roger Berkowitz, “Arendt and Eichmann,” reply by Mark Lilla, The New York Review of Books (December 19, 2013 Issue).
1701879376
1701879377 [21] Steven Pinker, “Science Is Not Your Enemy,” The New Republic (August 6, 2013).
1701879378
1701879379 [22] Leon Wieseltier, “Crimes Against Humanities,” The New Republic (September 3, 2013).
1701879380
1701879381 [23] Steven Pinker and Leon Wieseltier, “Science vs. the Humanities, Round III,” The New Republic(September 26, 2013).
1701879382
1701879383 [24] Daniel C. Dennett, “Let’s Start With A Respect For Truth” (September 10, 2013), http://www.edge.org/conversation/dennett-on-wieseltier-v-pinker-in-the-new-republic.
1701879384
1701879385 [25] “Noam Chomsky Slams Žižek and Lacan: Empty ‘Posturing’” (June 28, 2013), http://www.openculture.com/2013/06/noam_chomsky_slams_zizek_and_lacan_empty_posturing.html.
1701879386
1701879387 [26] “Slavoj Žižek Responds to Noam Chomsky: ‘I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong’” (July 17, 2013), http://www.openculture.com/2013/07/slavoj-zizekresponds-to-noam-chomsky.html.
1701879388
1701879389 [27] “The Feud Continues: Noam Chomsky Responds to Žižek, Describes Remarks as ‘Sheer Fantasy’”(July 22, 2013), http://www.openculture.com/2013/07/noam-chomsky-responds-tozizek-describes-remarks-as-sheer-fantasy.html.
1701879390
1701879391 [28] Slavoj Žižek, “Some Bewildered Clarifications,” International Journal of Žižek Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2013).
1701879392
1701879393 [29] Peter Thompson, “The Slavoj Žižek v. Noam Chomsky spat is worth a ringside seat,” The Guardian (July 19, 2013)
1701879394
1701879395 [30] Joshua Clover, “Atlantic Rim: Chomsky v. Žižek,” The Nation (September 2-9, 2013).
1701879396
1701879397 [31] David Rieff, “A Battle for the Soul of India,” The National Interest, September 4, 2013.
1701879398
1701879399 [32] Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya, “Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries,”Public Affairs, April 2013.
1701879400
1701879401 [33] Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen, An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions (Princeton University Press, July 2013).
1701879402
1701879403 [34] “Indian development: Beyond bootstrap,” The Economist, June 27, 2013.
1701879404
1701879405 [35] Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya, “Go for growth in India,” The Economist, July 13, 2013.
1701879406
1701879407 [36] “Amartya Sen responds,” The Economist, July 20, 2013.
1701879408
1701879409
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70187936e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]