1701879805
[3] Noam Chomsky: WikiLeaks Cables Reveal “Profound Hatred for Democracy on the Part of Our Political Leadership,” Democracy Now!, November 30, 2010 (http://www.democracynow.org).
1701879806
1701879807
[4] “Noam Chomsky Backs Wikileaks Protests in Australia,” Green Left Weekly, December 10, 2010 (http://www.greenleft.org.au).
1701879808
1701879809
[5] Michael Moore, “Why I’m Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange,” December14, 2010.
1701879810
1701879811
[6] Umberto Eco，“Not such Wicked Leaks Libération，”December 2, 2010. 英文翻译参照http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/414871-not-such-wicked-leaks。
1701879812
1701879813
[7] Frank Furedi, “WikiLeaks: This Isn’t Journalism . It’s Voyeurism,” Spiked, November 30, 2010 (http://www.spiked-online.com).
1701879814
1701879815
[8] 参见http://www.tnr.com/topics/wikileaks。
1701879816
1701879817
[9] Todd Gitlin, “Everything Is Data, but Data Isn’t Everything,” December 7, 2010. (http://www.tnr.com).
1701879818
1701879819
[10] “Is WikiLeaks’Julian Assange a Hero? Glenn Greenwald Debates Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News,” Democracy Now! December 3, 2010 (http://www.democracynow.org).
1701879820
1701879821
[11] Edward Carr, “The Dangers of a Rising China,” The Economist, December 4, 2010, p. 13.
1701879822
1701879823
[12] Edward Carr, “Special Report: China’s Place in the World,” The Economist, December 4, 2010, p. 52.
1701879824
1701879825
[13] “Does Moral Action Depend on Reasoning? Thirteen Views on the Question,” Spring 2010(www.templeton.org/reason).
1701879826
1701879827
[14] “Symposium on Socialism,” Dissent, Summer 2010.
1701879828
1701879829
[15] Michael Kazin,“Introduction”; Sheri Berman,“What Happened to the European Left?”; Robin Blackburn,“Socialism and the Current Crisis”; Jack Clark,“What Would a Real Socialist President Do?”; Michael Walzer, “Which Socialism?”Dissent, Summer 2010, pp. 23-43.
1701879830
1701879831
[16] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, NOMAD: From Islam to America: A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations, Free Press, 2010.
1701879832
1701879833
[17] Nicholas D. Kristof, “The Gadfly,” New York Times, May 30, 2010, p. BR22.
1701879834
1701879835
[18] Susan Jacoby, “Multiculturalism and Its Discontents,” Big Questions Online, August 19, 2010(http://www.bigquestionsonline.com).
1701879836
1701879837
[19] 会议议程参见http://www.luiss.edu/dptssp/node/143/。
1701879838
1701879839
[20] 参见Kwame Anthony Appiah, “Religious Faith and John Rawls,” The New York Review of Books, Vol. 57，No. 19，December 9，2010，pp. 51-52。
1701879840
1701879841
[21] John Rawls, A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith (with“On My Religion”), Thomas Nagel (ed.), Harvard University Press, 2009.
1701879842
1701879843
1701879844
1701879845
1701879847
2000年以来的西方 2009年
1701879848
1701879850
新资本主义还是新世界？
1701879851
1701879852
距离“二月事件”不到二十年，世界经济出现了严重的危机。今年5月，著名法律经济学家理查德·波斯纳出版了新著，其书名点出了他对这场经济危机的诊断：这是“资本主义的一场失败”（中译本将书名做了更为耸动的修饰，译作“资本主义的失败”）。[1]反讽的是，1989年的幻灭感似乎在二十年后再度出现，却是以“命运逆转”（reversal of fortune）的方式指向“资本主义”——这个许多人曾天真而热烈地寄予的希望。在历经了双重幻灭之后，未来的希望何在？人们是否会像二十年前“拥抱资本主义”那样热切地投身于对社会主义的期望？
1701879853
1701879854
2009年的西方思想界，既有对“复兴社会主义”的呼吁，也有对“改造资本主义”的诉求。但是，无论是“复兴”还是“改造”，都必须面对曾经的历史教训。左翼（托派）理论家艾伦·伍兹认为，当前的危机显示，人民需要的不是资本主义而是社会主义，但不是那种官僚集权式的社会主义。我们需要返回“真正的民主社会主义——马克思、恩格斯、李卜克内西和罗莎·卢森堡的社会主义”[2]。同样，许多资本主义的辩护者，也诉诸“理想的”而非“现实存在的”（也是陷入危机的）资本主义。在新的思想辩论中，每一方都将现实中的失败归咎于（社会主义或资本主义的）不良“变种”，而其“纯正的”版本似乎永远立于不败之地。“冷战思维”作为一种认知模式与政治想象，并没有随着柏林墙的崩塌而消失，甚至深藏在许多冷战思维指控者自身的批判意识中。但我们仍然需要这类标签吗？或者，我们应当给旧的标签赋予新的意义？
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.701879805e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]