打字猴:1.702359549e+09
1702359549
1702359550 (49) Harvey, D., Social Justice and the City, London, 1973;Harvey, D., “The Urban Process under Capitalism,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 101-131;Harvey, D, The limits to capital, Oxford, 1982. Massey, D., “Regionalism:Some Current Issues,” Capital and Class, 1978, Vol. 6, pp. 33-39;Messey, D., “The UK Electrical Engineering and Electronics Industries:The Implications of the Crisis for the Restructuring of Capital and Locational Change” in Dear, M. and Scott, A. J., eds., Urbanisation and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society, London, 1981, pp. 199-230. Massey, D. and Meegan, R., “The Geography of Industrial Reorganisation,” Progress in Planning, 1979, Vol. 10, pp. 159-237;Massey, D. and Meegan, R., The Anatomy of Job Loss:The How, Why and Where of Employment Decline, London, 1982. Walker, R. and Storper, M., “Capital and Industrial Location,” Progress in Human Geography, 1981, Vol. 5, pp. 473-509. Carney, J., Hudson, R. and Lewis, J., eds., Regions in Crisis, London, 1980.
1702359551
1702359552 (50) Harvey, D., “The Urban Process under Capitalism,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1978, Vol. 2, p. 124.
1702359553
1702359554 (51) Lipietz, A., “The Structuration of Space, the Problem of Land and Spatial Policy” in Carney, J., Hudson, R. and Lewis, J., eds., Regions in Crisis, London, 1980.
1702359555
1702359556 (52) Harvey, D., “The Spatial Fix: Hegel, von Thünen and Marx,” Antipode, 1981,Vol. 13(3), pp. 1-12; Harvey, D, The limits to capital, Oxford, 1982; 以及本书。
1702359557
1702359558 (53) Castells, M., “Crisis, Planning and the quality of Life: Managing the New Historical Relationships between Space and Society,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1983, Vol. 1, p. 4.
1702359559
1702359560 (54) Gregory, D., Ideology, Science and Human Geography, London, 1978, p. 120.
1702359561
1702359562 (55) Gregory, D., “Solid Geometry: Notes on the Recovery of Spatial Structure” in Gould, P. and Olsson, G., eds., A Search for Common Ground, London, 1982.
1702359563
1702359564 (56) Poulantzas, N., State, Power, Socialism, London, 1978, pp. 25 and 30.
1702359565
1702359566 (57) Poulantzas,N., State,Power,Socialism,London,1978,p. 80.
1702359567
1702359568 (58) Poulantzas,N., State,Power,Socialism,London,1978,p. 107.
1702359569
1702359570 (59) 参见Hadjimichalis, C., The Geographical Transfer of Value: A comparative Analysis of Regional Development of Southern Europe (unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles: School of Architecture and Urban Planning), 1980。
1702359571
1702359572 (60) Lipietz, A., “The Structuration of Space, the Problem of Land and Spatial Policy” in Carney, J., Hudson, R. and Lewis, J., eds, Regions in Crisis, London, 1980, p. 74.
1702359573
1702359574 (61) 对实践的强调是马克思著作的关键环节,批判社会理论和批判哲学的几乎所有当代支持者都赞同但却有选择地利用了马克思的著作。
1702359575
1702359576 (62) Giddens, A., Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, London and Berkeley, 1979, p. 22.
1702359577
1702359578 (63) Gregory, D., Ideology, Science and Human Geography, London, 1978.
1702359579
1702359580 (64) Giddens的著作中仅在几处参考了Lefebvre的著作,并且所参考的著作都是少数几本有英译本的著作。Giddens显然没有接受Lefebvre关于空间性在当代资本主义中重要性的论证(这一论证反对“时间机理”[temporal mechanism]),他也没有从自己对资本主义国家的分析中得出Lefebvre极力断言的这一结论,即已经出现了一种相当于新“国家生产模式”的国家制度(systéme étatique)。但是,Giddens的结构化理论在其他许多方面吸纳了有关空间之生产的一种解释,这种解释非常类似于用英国批判社会理论的概念词汇表述的Lefebvre的解释。
1702359581
1702359582 (65) Keat, R. and Urry, J., Social Theory as Science, London, 1982, p. 237.
1702359583
1702359584
1702359585
1702359586
1702359587 社会关系与空间结构 [:1702358046]
1702359588 社会关系与空间结构 第七章 资本主义的地缘政治学
1702359589
1702359590 大卫·哈维
1702359591
1702359592 我打算考察一下在资本主义生产方式下生活的地缘政治后果。我将从理论上进行论证,但我想这个论证的历史意义将是自明的,足以引发关于一个万分紧急事项的论争,可能还有相关的政治行动。
1702359593
1702359594
1702359595
1702359596
1702359597 社会关系与空间结构 [:1702358047]
1702359598 社会关系与空间结构 资本主义生产方式的核心特征
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.702359549e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]