1702360140
1702360141
(45) Burawoy, M., Manufacturing Consent, Chicago, 1979.
1702360142
1702360143
(46) 参见Storper, M., The Spatial Division of Labor: Technology, the Labor Process and the Location of Industries (unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley: Department of Geography), 1982。
1702360144
1702360145
(47) 在我强调资本再生产而不是劳动力再生产时，我接受L. McDowell（“Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 1, 1983, pp. 59－72）对我的所有批评。
1702360146
1702360147
(48) Storper, M., The Spatial Division of Labor: Technology, the Labor Process and the Location of Industries (unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley: Department of Geography), 1982; Storper, M. and Walker, R., “The Spatial Division of Labor: Labor and the Location of Industry” in Sawers, L. and Tabb, W. K., eds., Sunbelt/Frostbelt: Urban Development and Regional Restructuring, New York, 1984.
1702360148
1702360149
(49) Storper, M. and Walker, R., “The Theory of Labour and the Theory of Location,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1983, Vol. 7, pp. 1－44; Storper, M. and Walker, R., “The Spatial Division of Labor: Labor and the Location of Industry” in Sawers, L. and Tabb, W. K., eds., Sunbelt/Frostbelt: Urban Development and Regional Restructuring, New York, 1984.
1702360150
1702360151
(50) Walker, R. and Storper, M., “Capital and Industrial Location,” Progress in Human Geography, 1981, Vol. 5, pp. 473－509.
1702360152
1702360153
(51) Bleitrach, D. and Chenu, A., “Modes of Domination and Everyday Life: Some Notes on Recent Research” in Harloe, M. and Lebas, E., eds., City, Class and Capital, London, 1981; Massey, D., “Regionalism：Some Current Issues,” Capital and class, 1978, Vol. 6, pp. 33－39.
1702360154
1702360155
(52) 例如, Giddens, A., The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (2nd edn), London, 1981。
1702360156
1702360157
(53) Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B., The Deindustrialization of America, New York, 1982; Walker, R. and Storper, M., “Capital and Industrial Location,” Progress in Human Geography, 1981, Vol. 5, pp. 473－509.
1702360158
1702360159
(54) Walker, R. and Storper, M., “Capital and Industrial Location,” Progressin Human Geography, 1981, Vol. 5, pp. 473－509.
1702360160
1702360161
(55) Clark, G. and Gertler, M., “Migration and Capital,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1983, Vol. 73, pp. 18－34; Piore, M., Birds of Passage, Cambridge, 1979.
1702360162
1702360163
(56) Storper, M., The Spatial Division of Labor: Technology, the Labor Process and the Location of Industries (unpublishedPh. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley: Department of Geography), 1982.
1702360164
1702360165
(57) Massey, D., “Regionalism: Some Current Issues,” Capital and class, 1978, Vol. 6, pp. 33－39.
1702360166
1702360167
(58) 参见Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B., The Deindustrialization of America, New York, 1982。
1702360168
1702360169
(59) 例如, Gregory, D., Regional Transformation and Industrial Revolution: A Geography of the Yorkshire Woollen Industry, London and Minneapolis, 1982; Walkowitz, D., “Woker City, Company Town, Champaign,” Illinois, 1978。
1702360170
1702360171
(60) 又见Sayer, A., “Explanation in Economic Geography: Abstraction versus Generalisation,” Progress in Human Geography, 1982, Vol. 6, pp. 68－88。
1702360172
1702360173
(61) Giddens, A., The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (2nd edn), London, 1981, p. 110.
1702360174
1702360175
(62) Davis, M., “Why the US Working Class is Different,” New Left Review, 1980, Vol. 123, pp. 3－46.
1702360176
1702360177
1702360178
1702360179
1702360181
社会关系与空间结构 第九章 空间变化、政治与分工
1702360182
1702360183
艾伦·沃德
1702360184
1702360185
本章致力于探究英国政治的历史地理中存在的某些难题。它所关注的是，在空间上集中于民族国家内部的政治实践的兴衰规律。“红色”克莱德塞德（Clydeside）或南约克郡“社会主义共和国”的形成原因是什么？我们如何解释近年来令政治学家感到困惑的凯尔特民族主义（Celtic nationalism）的复苏？有些分析将城市与地方社会运动的增长看做是近十五年间的主要政治发展。我们如何看待这些分析？要恰当地解释这些发展似乎必须在理论上同时涉及空间、时间和带有因果力的社会机制。然而，正如萨克所指出的，(1)成功地包含以上三种要素的解释相当罕见。他合理地断言，这是因为社会科学的解释普遍缺乏说服力。尽管近来出现不少理论尝试，(2)但尚未有令人满意的理论可以囊括空间、时间和实际社会进程之间的相互关系。同时，由于缺乏适当的理论，社会学家们往往会求助于比喻。本章将梳理一个被多琳·梅西概念化的关于社会经济关系空间结构变化的比喻，这个比喻影响了马克思主义者、亲马克思社会关系与空间结构主义者或“结构”学派的英国研究。(3)它依据资本连续积累的效应呈现了制造业的区位模式。这种效应层层积淀，创造了性质迥异的跨国经济区。在每一轮新的积累中，资本主要根据不同地点的劳动力特点来选择最佳区位。我对这个卓有成效的比喻的某些局限进行了研究。我注意到，其他作者已在极力通过某些方法解释特定区域的政治实践的发生率。因此，我试图确定一个恰当的空间变化理论必须满足的标准，尝试性地提出一个以关于社会关系地质学的扩展比喻为基础的方法。
1702360186
1702360187
1702360188
1702360189
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70236014e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]