1702398190
1702398191
62. Macharia, Who Makes the News? 9.
1702398192
1702398193
63. Cristal Williams Chancellor, Diahann Hill, Katti Gray, Cindy Royal, and Barbara Findlen, The Status of Women in the US Media 2017 , Women’s Media Center, http://wmc.3cdn.net/10c550d19ef9f3688f_mlbres2jd.pdf.
1702398194
1702398195
64. Cécile Guillaume and Sophie Pochic, “What Would You Sacrifice? Access to Top Man-agement and the Work–Life Balance,” Gender, Work & Organization 16, no. 1 (2009): 14-36.
1702398196
1702398197
65. Lauren G. Berlant, Cruel Optimism (Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press, 2011).
1702398198
1702398199
66. Berlant, Cruel Optimism , 166.
1702398200
1702398201
第3章 甜心妈咪 vs. 家庭CEO
1702398202
1702398203
1. 罗伯托只称“我妻子”而不呼其名，呼应了戈夫曼的观点：“只用某人的妻子来称呼一个女人，是把她放在了一个类别里。虽然那个类别眼下只指她一个人，但总归是个群体，而她只是其中一员……类别的核心在于，我们对于她作为‘妻子’群体一员的行为和本性，有一系列社会标准的期望。”Ervin Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (London: Penguin, 1990 [1963]), 70.
1702398204
1702398205
2. Wednesday Martin, “Poor Little Rich Women,” New York Times , May 16, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/opinion/sunday/poor-little-rich-women.html.
1702398206
1702398207
3. Susan Faludi, Backlash: The Undeclared War against Women (London: Chatto & Windus, 1992), 70–71. 关于维多利亚时代对妇女当全职太太和妈妈的美化，参见Eli Zaretsky, Capitalism, the Family and Personal Life (London: Pluto, 1976)。
1702398208
1702398209
4. Faludi, Backlash , 106; 讨论施瓦茨文章发表后的媒体热潮，以及《三十而立》（Thirtysomething ）等热门电视剧对全职妈妈的描绘，另见Susan Douglas and Meredith W. Michaels, The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined All Women (New York: Free Press, 2004)。
1702398210
1702398211
5. Felice Schwartz, “Management Women and the New Facts of Life,” Harvard Business Review (January-February 1989), https://hbr.org/1989/01/management-women-and-the-new-facts-of-life.
1702398212
1702398213
6. Douglas and Michaels, Mommy Myth , 207; Kathryn A. Cady, “Flexible Labor: A Femi-nist Response to Late Twentieth-century Capitalism?” Feminist Media 13, no. 3 (2013): 395–414.
1702398214
1702398215
7. Catherine Hakim Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory , (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
1702398216
1702398217
8. Hakim, Work-Lifestyle Choice , 161. 对哈基姆理论的详细批判，参见Mary Leahy and James Doughney, “Women, Work and Preference Formation: A Critique of Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory,” Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics 1, no. 1 (2014): 37–48; Patricia Lewis and Ruth Simpson, “Hakim Revisited: Preference, Choice and the Postfeminist Gender Regime,” Gender, Work & Organization 24, no. 2 (2017): 115–133; Susan McRae, “Constraints and Choices in Mothers’ Employment Careers: A Consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory.” British Journal of Sociology 54, no. 3 (2003): 317–338。
1702398218
1702398219
9. Lisa Belkin, “The Opt-Out Revolution,” New York Times Magazine , October 26, 2003, 42–47, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/magazine/the-opt-out-revolution.html.
1702398220
1702398221
10. Pamela Stone, Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 4.
1702398222
1702398223
11. Arielle Kuperberg and Pamela Stone, “The Media Depiction of Women Who Opt Out,” Gender & Society 22, no. 4 (2008): 503.
1702398224
1702398225
12. Kuperberg and Stone, “Media Depiction,” 506.
1702398226
1702398227
13. Kuperberg and Stone, “Media Depiction,” 512.
1702398228
1702398229
14. Daisy Sands, “The Impact of Austerity on Women,” (London: Fawcett Society, 2012). 2017年英国下议院图书馆（UK House of Commons Library）实施的一项研究显示，自2010年来，妇女承担了86%的财政紧缩负担。参见Heather Stewart, “Women Bearing 86 percent of Austerity Burden, Commons Figures Reveal,” Guardian , March 9, 2017。
1702398230
1702398231
15. Shani Orgad and Sara De Benedictis, “The ‘Stay-At-Home’ Mother, Postfeminism and Neoliberalism: Content Analysis of UK News Coverage,” European Journal of Communication 30, no. 4 (2015): 418–436.
1702398232
1702398233
16. Orgad and De Benedictis, “The ‘Stay-At-Home’ Mother.”
1702398234
1702398235
17. 参见Peter Dominiczak, “We Have Done Enough for ‘Admirable’ Stay-at-Home Parents, Insists Clegg,” Daily Telegraph , March 29, 2013.
1702398236
1702398237
18. 例如，参见Kim Akass, “Motherhood and Myth-Making: Dispatches from the Frontline of the US Mommy Wars,” Feminist Media Studies 12, no. 1 (2012): 137–141. 阿卡斯认为，经济衰退时期英国和美国的新闻报道和大众媒体再现推动了性别歧视的反弹，恢复了旧式男人养家糊口/女人照顾家小的家庭模式，还强调女人是“自愿回归‘传统’家庭角色的”。另见Kim Akass, “Gendered Politics of a Global Recession: A News Media Analysis,” Studies in the Maternal 4, no. 2 (2012): 2。
1702398238
1702398239
19. Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker, Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014). 另见Rebecca Bramall, The Cultural Politics of Austerity: Past and Present in Austere Times (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, 2013)中对“怀念艰苦岁月”（austerity nostalgia）的讨论。
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70239819e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]