打字猴:1.702819989e+09
1702819989
1702819990 [175] 该条规定:“所有的人皆应有资格充分而平等地享受物资、服务、设施、优惠、利益和任何本条所定义之公共场所提供之招待,不得基于种族、肤色、信仰或出生国籍而有所歧视或隔离。”——译注
1702819991
1702819992 [176] Vicki Schultz, “Telling Stories about Work.” Harvard Law Review, 103 (1990), p.1806.
1702819993
1702819994 [177] Vicki Schultz, “Telling Stories about Work.” Harvard Law Review, 103 (1990). p.1816.
1702819995
1702819996 [178] Value Line, August 13, 2004.
1702819997
1702819998 [179] From the complaint of Lieff, Cabraser and Bernstein LLP, http://www.LieffCabraser.com.
1702819999
1702820000 [180] 关于工资和劳动之间的详尽区别,可参见马克思在《资本论》中的论述。K. Marx, Capital, Vol.1 (New York: International Publishers, 1967), pp.231-302.
1702820001
1702820002 [181] Dukes v. Walmart Stores N. D. Cal. No C012252.
1702820003
1702820004 [182] J. Baer, Our Lives Before the Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press,1999), p.55.
1702820005
1702820006 [183] Bona fide occupational qualification ——编者。
1702820007
1702820008 [184] Baer, op.cit., p.151.
1702820009
1702820010 [185] Baer, op.cit., pp.152,153.
1702820011
1702820012 [186] M. Stockdale,“What We Know and What We Need to Learn About Sexual Harass-ment,” in M. Stockdale (ed.), Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (Thousand Oaks,Calif.: Sage,1996) 6.
1702820013
1702820014 [187] R. Paetzold and A. 0’ Leary - Kelly,The Implications of U.S. Supreme Court and Circuit Court Decisions for Hostile Environmental Sexual Harassment Cases,in M. Stockdle(ed), Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, Thousand Oaks Calif.: Sage, 1996, 91.
1702820015
1702820016 [188] 图②百分数相加后不等于100%,因为案件中的骚扰者可能有不止一种类型的骚扰行为。
1702820017
1702820018 [189] 图③括号中的数字代表该类案件数。
1702820019
1702820020 [190] R. Paetzold and A. O’,Leary-Kelly, The Implications of U.S. Supreme Court and Circuit Court Decisions for Hostile Environmental Sexual Harassment Cases,in M.Stockdle(ed), Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, Thousand Oaks Calif.: Sage, 1996, 89-92.
1702820021
1702820022 [191] Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,477 U.S, 57(1985), 60.
1702820023
1702820024 [192] Ellison v. Brady,924 F. 2d 872(1991),878-879.
1702820025
1702820026 [193] From “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Poltics” by Crenshaw, K., University of Chicago Legal Forum,“Feminism in the Law; Theory, Practice, and Criticism.”
1702820027
1702820028 [194] Neil Gotanda,“A Critique of Our Constitution is Color-Blind,”Stanford Law Review, Vol.1, 1991.
1702820029
1702820030
1702820031
1702820032
1702820033 法律之门(第八版) [:1702815079]
1702820034 法律之门(第八版) 第二篇 法律实施
1702820035
1702820036 任何形式的政府一旦变得损害其目的时,人民就有权利改变或者废除它……过去的经验表明,当罪恶尚可容忍时,人类宁愿默然忍受,而不愿废除他们习惯了的那些形式,以恢复自己的权利。但是,当一个政府恶贯满盈,倒行逆施,一贯奉行同一个目标,即,显然是企图把人民压制在绝对专制主义之下时,人民就有这种权利,人民就有这种义务,来推翻这样的政府。
1702820037
1702820038 ——《独立宣言》,1776年
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.702819989e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]