1702822881
与此同时，我一见到K在学生会大楼的另一边，就赶快避开她。
1702822882
1702822883
提示与问题
1702822884
1702822885
1.其他人也对法学院考试这个幽灵进行了探索。这里就有一个来自英国法律教育的例子：
1702822886
1702822887
这在浪漫国（Ruritania）、都市国（Urbania）、帝国（Imperia）和无产阶级国（Proletania）等名目下的地区都会出现。由于命运捉弄，一个疯狂的“反乌托邦”（dystopia）被创造出来，它的公民全部陷入了可怕的犯罪和复杂的诉讼。名字……也限于某些纯粹无法无天的人物。我们有“阴暗”、“贪欲”、“纵欲”和“花花公子”等先生。”灰色手指”先生以“金袋”先生的名义兑现一张坏票。女士们有“轻浮”小姐和“扯淡”小姐……他们时常酗酒滋事，一般都要武装自己，比如自行车气筒之类，可以充当危险的武器。请人吃饭要做一些草图，指示赴约的地点，引导他们跌入峡谷。“哲基尔大夫”（Dr jekyll）与一名女患者发生性关系，女方同意，因为他谎称这是在做一次外科手术，可以治好她的百日咳。[327]
1702822888
1702822889
法学院的考试号称是关于真实世界的。当然，它的目的是测试法律知识和技术的。鉴于测试是产生压力的，一些教授可能考虑使用一些可笑的人物，给考题引入一些幽默和乐趣。即使考题企图制造幽默（与种族或性别有关的），它们暗示了构思这些奇想的教师的哪些方面？学生们又会如何看待这些大众的形象？而培养他们正是为了服务于这些大众。
1702822890
1702822891
2.威廉斯教授，因为替学生说话，而遭到与学生同样的命运——放逐并谴责受害者。这对法学院文化、教育学和等级制又意味着什么？对辩护律师呢？
1702822892
1702822893
[304] Lon Fuller, “On Teaching Law,” Stanford Law Review.
1702822894
1702822895
[305] Karl E. Klare, “The Law - School Curriculum in the 1980s: What’s Left?” Journal of Legal Education(1982).
1702822896
1702822897
[306] “Law as a Hard Science” by John Bonsignore,ALSA Forum (December,1977),Vol.2,No.3,pp.65-74,published by the American Legal Studies Association.
1702822898
1702822899
[307] Victoria Steinberg, “Why I Quit Law School,” College Digest (Spring 1982): 7A.
1702822900
1702822901
[308] Paul Savoy, “Toward a New Politics of Legal Education,” Yale Law Journal, Vol.79, pp.444-504,1970.
1702822902
1702822903
[309] Andrew Watson, “The Quest for Professional Competence: Psychological Aspects of Legal Education,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 37(1968): 131.
1702822904
1702822905
[310] Robert F. Nagel,“Invisible Teachers: A Comment on Perceptions in the Classroom.”Journal of Legal Education,Vol.32,p.359,1982.
1702822906
1702822907
[311] Alan Stone, “Legal Education on the Couch,” Harvard Law Review 85(1971): 412-413.
1702822908
1702822909
[312] Scott Turrow, One L (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Inc.), 1977.
1702822910
1702822911
[313] Ronald M. Pipkin, “Legal Education: The Consumers’ Perspective,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1976, no.4 (1976): 1191.
1702822912
1702822913
[314] Robert Granfield, Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond (New York: Routledge, 1992), p.131.
1702822914
1702822915
[315] Wibert E. Moore, The professions: Roles and Rules (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970), pp.76-79.
1702822916
1702822917
[316] Lawrence Dieker, Jr., Letters from Law School: The Life of a Second-Year Law Student (Lincoln, NE: Writers Club,2000), pp.239-240.
1702822918
1702822919
[317] Robert Ebert Byrnes and Jaime Marquart, Brush with the Law: The True Story of Law School Today at Harvard and Stanford, Los Angeles: Renaissance Books, 2001.
1702822920
1702822921
[318] Elizabeth Mertz, with Wamucii Njogu and Susan Gooding,“ What Difference Does Difference Make? The Challenge for Legal Education,” in Journal of Legal Education (Vol.48, No.1, 1998, pp.1-87).
1702822922
1702822923
[319] Duncan Kennedy, Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System (Cambridge, Mass.: Afar, 1983).
1702822924
1702822925
[320] Ralph Nader,“ Law Schools and Law Firms,” New Republic (October 11, 1969): p.21.
1702822926
1702822927
[321] David N. Rockwell, “The Education of the Capitalist Lawyer: The Law School,” in Robert Lefcourt, ed., Law Against the People (New York
:Vintage Books, 1971), p.97.
1702822928
1702822929
[322] Richard D. Kahlenberg, Broken Contract: A Memoir of Harvard Law School (New York: Hill and Wang, 1992), pp.153-154.
1702822930
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.702822881e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]