1702934195
1702934196
(8) James Dougherty and Robert Pfaltzgraff, Jr. , Contending Theories of International Relations, p. 5.
1702934197
1702934198
(9) Paul Schroeder, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, Summer 1994.
1702934199
1702934200
(10) Stephen Rock, Why Peace Breaks out: Great Power Rapproachement in Historical Perspective, University of North Carolina Press, 1989, pp. 149—159.
1702934201
1702934202
(11) Francis Fukuyama, “The End of History”, National Interest, Summer 1989.
1702934203
1702934204
(12) John Lewis Gaddis, “International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War”, International Security, Vol. 17, No. 3, Winter 1992/1993, 1992年; 牛津大学出版社出版了他的专著《美国与冷战的结束》 (The U. S. and the End of the Cold War) 。
1702934205
1702934206
(13) William Wohlforth, “Realism and the End of the Cold War”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, Winter 1994/1995; “Revising Theories of International Politics in Response to the End of the Cold War”, World Politics 50, July 1998.
1702934207
1702934208
(14) John Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutionalism”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, Winter 1994/1995.
1702934209
1702934210
(15) David Baldwin (ed. ), Neorealism and Neoliberalism, p. 271.
1702934211
1702934212
(16) John Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutionalism”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, Winter 1994/1995.
1702934213
1702934214
(17) 同上。
1702934215
1702934216
(18) 同上。
1702934217
1702934218
(19) 同上。
1702934219
1702934220
(20) John Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutionalism”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, Winter 1994/1995.
1702934221
1702934222
(21) 同上。
1702934223
1702934224
(22) 同上。
1702934225
1702934226
(23) Alexander Wendt, “The Agent-structure Problem in International Relations Theory”, International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 3, Summer 1987.
1702934227
1702934228
(24) John Mearsheimer, “A Realist Reply”, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, Summer 1995.
1702934229
1702934230
(25) 参阅Robert W. Cox, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, Millennium: Journal International Studies, 10, No. 2, 1981, pp. 128—137; Steve Smith, “The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory”, Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds. ), International Relations Theory Today, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, pp. 25—27.
1702934231
1702934232
(26) 参阅Yosef Lapid, “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era”, International Studies Quarterly, 33, No. 3, 1999.
1702934233
1702934234
(27) 参阅尤尔根·哈贝马斯，《认识与兴趣》，郭官义和李黎译，学林出版社，1999年。哈贝马斯大部分著作未被译成汉语，主要的有：“A Postscript to Knowledge and Human Interests”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences (Vol. 3, 1973), pp. 175—185; Theory and Practice trans. by J. Viertel, Beacon Press, 1973; Towards a Rational Society trans. by J. J. Shapiro Beacon Press, 1970 and Legitimation Crisis trans. by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, 1975. For a discussion of Habermas’s ideas, see J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds. ), Habermas, Critical Debates, MacMillan, 1982; G. Kortian, Metacritique, The Philosophical Argument of Jurgen Habermas, Cambridge University Press, 1980; R. Guees, Habermas and Critical Theory Oxford University Press, 1982, G. Therborn, “Habermas: A New Eclectic”, New Left Review (No. 67, 1971), pp. 69—83 and F. R. Dallmayr, “Critical Theory Criticized: Habermas’s Knowledge and Human Interests and Its Aftermath”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences (Vol. 2, 1972) ．
1702934235
1702934236
(28) 参阅Max Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays Herder and Herder, 1972.
1702934237
1702934238
(29) 参阅夏基松，《现代西方哲学教程》，上海人民出版社，1985年版，第29—39和417—440页；Mark Neufeld, The Reconstruturing of International Relations Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 22—28.
1702934239
1702934240
(30) 关于次数的划分，参考了以下论文：Nick Rengger and Mark Hoffman, “Modernity, Postmodernism and International Relations”, in Joe Doherty and Elspeth Graham and Mo Malelz (eds. ), Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, St. Martin’s Press, 1992, pp. 127—147.
1702934241
1702934242
(31) Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations, Alfred Knorf, 1973, p. xi.
1702934243
1702934244
(32) 参阅Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicage Press, 1962. 科恩讨论了理论范式问题，把“范式”定义为“一方面它代表某个特定团体成员所共享有的信念、价值、技巧等的总汇；另一方面，它指这一总汇中的一种要素，即作为模式或范例使用的具体解疑方法，解疑方法可以代表明确的规则，作为解决常规科学其余难题的基础”。（第175页）关于西方国际关系理论范式间的争论，可参阅M. Banks, “The Inter-paradigm Debate”, in M. Light and A. J. R. Groom (eds. ), International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory, Francis Printer, 1985, pp. 7—23．
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.702934195e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]