1703233328
(40)举例来说，美国几项法律清楚地以此为目的，直接鼓励并促进美国证券交易委员会与其他国家证券交易委员会之间达成谅解备忘录提供了便利条件。Faith T.Teo，“Memoranda of Understanding among Securities Regulations：Frameworks for Cooperation，Implications for Governance,”Harvard Law School（1998）：29-43.（据作者存档文件）
1703233329
1703233330
(41)On Globe International homepage（cited 1 July 2003）；available from http://www.globeinternational.org.
1703233331
1703233332
(42)Kaiser，“Globalisierung als Problem der Demokratie,”3.也可参见欧盟机构改革专员的网页，“Commissioner for Regional Policy and Institutional Reform”on Europa homepage（cited 1 July 2003）；available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/barnier/profil/index_en.htm，若需查阅欧盟成员国各国家议会之间进一步关系的建议案。
1703233333
1703233334
(43)Falk and Strauss，“Toward a Global Parliament,”：212.
1703233335
1703233336
(44)Lousie Doswald-Beck，“The Influence of National Parliaments on Global Policy-Making,”Berlin，26，November 2001，quoted in Steve Charnovitz，“Trans-Parliamentary Associations in Global Functional Agencies,”Transnational Associations 2（2002）：88-91,90 n.20.
1703233337
1703233338
(45)Charnovitz，“Trans-Parliamentary Associations in Global Functional Agencies，”88.
1703233339
1703233340
(46)Ibid.，89.
1703233341
1703233342
(47)Mike Moore，“Promoting Openness，Fairness and Predictability in International Trade for the Benefit of Humanity,”2001年6月8日在各国议会联盟针对国际贸易而召开的会议上所作的发言，on World Trade Organization homegape（cited 1 July 2003）；available from http://www.wto.org/french/news_f/spmm_f/spmm64_f.htm.
1703233343
1703233344
(48)Annan，We the People,70.
1703233345
1703233346
(49)Reinicke and Deng，Critical Choices：the United Nations，Networks and the Future of Global Governance.
1703233347
1703233348
(50)Reinicke，“The Other World Wide Web.”
1703233349
1703233350
(51)See Koch，“Judicial Review and Global Federalism,”491.
1703233351
1703233352
(52)See the “Symposium on Global Administrative Law”；see also Aman，“Administrative Law for a New Century.”
1703233353
1703233354
(53)“American Bar Association House of Delegates Recommendation no.107C，Harmonization Recommendation（August 2001）,”on American Bar Association homepage（cited 1 July 2003）；available from http://www.abanet.org/leadeship/2001/107c.pdf.，para.（2）.
1703233355
1703233356
(54)Petersmann，“Constitutionalism and International Organizations,”398；idem，“Constitutionalism and International Adjudication：How to Constitutionalize the U.N.Dispute Settlement System?”753.
1703233357
1703233358
(55)Ignatieff，Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry，4.
1703233359
1703233360
(56)Ibid.，94.
1703233361
1703233362
(57)Ibid.，94-95.
1703233363
1703233364
(58)“Notes for and address by the Honourable Paul Martin，to the Royal Institute of International Affairs.”
1703233365
1703233366
(59)Cohen，“Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,”74.
1703233367
1703233368
(60)Loucks v.Standard Oil Co.，120 N.E.198，201（N.Y.1918）.
1703233369
1703233370
(61)宪法要求每个州都给予彼此之间的法案条款以充分的信任与尊重。U.S.CONST.art.IV，§1，cl.1.这是联邦主义将各州融合到一个更大的政体之中的基本手段。
1703233371
1703233372
(62)Laker Airways Ltd.V.Sabena，Belgian World Airlines 731 F.2d 909（D.C.Cir.1984）.
1703233373
1703233374
(63)In re Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on 16 March 1978，954 F.2d 1279，1312-1313（7th Cir.1992）（per curiam）.The Chevron doctrine was set forth in Chevron U.S.A.inc.v.Natural Resources Defence Council，Inc.,467 U.S.837，844（1984）（它主张，“法庭不能用政府行政人员的合理解释来代替一个法律条款自身的解释。我们早就认识到，应该给予行政部门对它有权解释的那部分法律体系的看法以相当的重视。”）
1703233375
1703233376
(64)Omron Healthcare，Inc.v.Maclaren Exports Ltd.，28 F.3d 600，604（7th Cir.1994）.
1703233377
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.703233328e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]