1703367040
1703367041
17Ibid.
1703367042
1703367043
18Michael Walzer，“Justice Here and Now，”in Frank S. Lucash，ed.，Justice and Equality Here and Now，Ithaca，N. Y.：Cornell University Press，1986，pp. 137138.
1703367044
1703367045
19Michael Walzer，Spheres of Justice：A Defense of Pluralism and Equality，New York：Basic Books，1983，p. 67n.
1703367046
1703367047
20Ibid.，p. 9.
1703367048
1703367049
21Michael Walzer，Spheres of Justice：A Defense of Pluralism and Equality，New York：Basic Books，1983，p. 85.
1703367050
1703367051
第六章 分配正义和群体认可
1703367052
1703367053
1讨论正义的一些文章请参见罗岗、倪文尖编：《90年代思想文选》（第三卷），广西人民出版社2000年版。讨论者使用的“公正”概念也就是我在这里所说的“正义”。
1703367054
1703367055
2Agnes Heller，General Ethics，New York：Basil Blackwell，1988，p. 148.
1703367056
1703367057
3Michael Walzer，“Liberalism and the Art of Separation，”Political Theory，12：3，August 1984：315330，p. 315.
1703367058
1703367059
4Ibid.
1703367060
1703367061
5Ibid.，p.316.
1703367062
1703367063
6Ibid.，p.321.
1703367064
1703367065
7David Miller，“Complex Equality，”in David Miller and Michael Walzer，eds.，Pluralism，Justice，and Equality，New York：Oxford University Press，1995，p. 198.
1703367066
1703367067
8Ibid.，p. 199.
1703367068
1703367069
9Ibid.
1703367070
1703367071
10Michael Walzer，“Liberalism and the Art of Separation，”p.326.
1703367072
1703367073
11Ibid.，p.327.
1703367074
1703367075
12Michael Walzer，“Response，”in David Miller and Michael Walzer，eds.，Pluralism，Justice，and Equality，p. 287.
1703367076
1703367077
13Michael Walzer，“Liberalism and the Art of Separation，”p.321.
1703367078
1703367079
14Ibid.，p.322.
1703367080
1703367081
15Ibid.
1703367082
1703367083
16Ibid.
1703367084
1703367085
17Michacel Walzer，“Response，”pp. 285286.
1703367086
1703367087
18Michael Walzer，Spheres of Justice：A Defense of Pluralism and Equality，New York：Basic Books，1983，p. 85.
1703367088
1703367089
19Ibid.，p. 89.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70336704e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]