1704428080
1704428081
6.Susan N.Houseman and Kenneth F.Ryder, ed.，Measurement Issues Arising from the Growth of Globalization：Conference Papers, UpjohnInstitute，2010，http：//www.bea.gov/papers/pdf/bea_2010_conference%20papers_fnal.pdf.
1704428082
1704428083
7.Yuqing Xing，“How the iPhone Widens the US Trade Deficit with China，”Vox，10 April 2011，http：//www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6335.Accessed 14 January 2013.
1704428084
1704428085
8.Andrew Walker，“UK Productivity Puzzle Baffes Economists，”BBC World Service，17 October 2012，http：//www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19981498.
1704428086
1704428087
9.Diane Coyle, The Weightless World（Oxford：Capstone，1996）.
1704428088
1704428089
10.W.J.Baumol and W.G.Bowen，“On the Performing Arts：The Anatomy of Their Economic Problems，”American Economic Review 55，no.1/2（1965）：495-502.
1704428090
1704428091
11.Kevin Kelly，“The Post-Productive Economy，”The Technium, January 2013，http：//www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_post produc.php.
1704428092
1704428093
12.Paul Krugman，“Robots and Robber Barons，”New York Times, December 2012，http：//www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/opinion/krugmanrobots-and-robber-barons.html?_r=0.
1704428094
1704428095
13.Erik Brynjolfsson and Adam Saunders，“What the GDP Gets Wrong，”MIT Sloan Management Review, fall 2009，http：//sloanreview.mitedu/article/what-the-gdp-gets-wrong-why-managers-should-care/.Accessed 27 March 2013.
1704428096
1704428097
14.See, for example，“What Good Is the Internet?”Economist，8 March 2013，http：//www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/03/technology.Accessed 27 March 2013.
1704428098
1704428099
15.Erik Brynjolfsson and JooHee Oh，“The Attention Economy：Measuring the Value of Free Digital Services on the Internet，”MIT working paper, July 2012.See also a summary in“Net Benefts，”The Economist，9 March 2013，http：//www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21573091-how-quantify-gains-internet-has-brought-consumers-net-benefts.
1704428100
1704428101
16.Michael Mandel，“Beyond Goods and Services：The（Unmeasured）Rise of the Data-Driven Economy，”Progressive Policy Institute Policy Memo, October 2012.
1704428102
1704428103
17.William D.Nordhaus and James Tobin，“Is Growth Obsolete?”in Economic Research：Retrospect and Prospect, vol.5，Economic Growth, ed.William D.Nordhaus and James Tobin（New York：National Bureau of Economic Research，1972），http：//www.nber.org/books/nord72-1.
1704428104
1704428105
18.Diane Coyle, The Economics of Enough（Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press，2011）.
1704428106
1704428107
19.Martin L.Weitzman，“On the Welfare Signifcance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy，”Quarterly Journal of Economics 90（1976）：156-162；Martin L.Weitzman, Income, Capital, and the Maximum Principle（Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press，2003）.
1704428108
1704428109
20.Nicholas Oulton，“The Wealth and Poverty of Nations：True PPPs for 141 Countries，”Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, March 2010.
1704428110
1704428111
21.Ben Friedman, The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth（New York：Alfred A Knopf，2005）.
1704428112
1704428113
22.I discussed these issues in more detail in The Economics of Enough.
1704428114
1704428115
1704428116
1704428117
1704428118
极简GDP史 [:1704426555]
1704428119
1704428120
极简GDP史 译者后记GDP：风吹草动总关情
1704428121
1704428122
如果有一个数据，它的任何一丝风吹草动，都能让上至政要下至黎民，牵肠挂肚，忽喜忽悲，那么它一定是GDP。
1704428123
1704428124
一个指标能被重视到如此，不能不说是一种历史的幸运，但又何尝不是一种悲哀：人们对它太熟悉了，熟悉得不愿意再去深入了解一下。GDP究竟是什么？它又是如何被确定为国际通行的衡量经济的指标的？它好在哪儿，又坏在哪儿？为什么它的一丝风吹草动严重时甚至能引起执政党下台、政府改组的后果？一大批对GDP狂热膜拜或口诛笔伐的人，往往在面对这些基本问题时有些力不从心。
1704428125
1704428126
在很多情况下，GDP的命运不外乎以下两种：用无限拔高激起的反感来消解这个国际通用的经济计量指标应有的重要性，用随意贬低来嫁祸人为失误导致的种种灾难性经济社会后果。究竟是GDP的罪，还是片面追求GDP的罪，这是几十年来人类历史上一桩悬而未决的公案。
1704428127
1704428128
和无原则的臧否相比，深入事物的内在，从根源出发厘清它演变的脉络，探求人类经济社会发展及其衡量方法的变化图谱，从而为继承或扬弃提供坚实的根由，要费时费力得多，但却有意义得多。让我们首先去理解它，在理解的基础上，再尝试着去评价它，这或许是对待GDP和受它影响多年的我们自己，相对公正的方法。
1704428129