1705132814

1705132815 During the Middle Ages of the Western tradition, rhetoric continued to be taught, variously using models of excellent speakers for students to imitate as well as by having students memorize or mimic words and writings of famous people. Near the end of the Renaissance, however, the development of rhetoric continued to grow into new areas of focus. For example, Francis Bacon(1561-1626), a skilled and authoritative speaker, spoke artfully in the English House of Commons on weighty government matters. Bacon’s writings emphasized the importance of audience and the need to verify the senses with empirical data.

1705132816

1705132817 Scotsmen George Campbell (1719-1796) and Hugh Blair (1718-1800) and Englishman Richard Whately (1787-1863), all religious ministers, wrote respectively about evidence, audience analysis, and the relationship between taste and reason, collectively setting the stage for the most recent developments in rhetoric and argument in the West generally and in the United States in particular (Foss, Foss, and Trapp, 2014).

1705132818

1705132819 Some of the most important Western works of the twentieth century regarding argument include Stephen Toulmin’s Uses of Argument and Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s The New Rhetoric. These scholars have been especially influential with teachers of argument and debate in Canada and the United States. An English philosopher who became interested in the study of how arguments are constructed, Toulmin is most well known for his “layout of argument” which involves a diagram showing how various parts of a reasoned argument combine with one another. The Toulmin Model has become a standard to follow in different forms of debate and is used in this textbook as well as many others that feature argument, debate, or persuasion. Interestingly, Toulmin does not use the word, “rhetoric,” and considers his book to be concerned with the philosophy of science.

1705132820

1705132821 The work of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca was especially important to the development of the Western point of view towards rhetoric in the mid-twentieth century. Their contributions fall into three categories: the concept of audience, the starting points of argument, and the techniques of argument. The theories advanced by these three contemporary scholars, along with work amassed by classic Western scholars throughout the centuries, provide the rhetorical platform used in this textbook for learning about debate.

1705132822

1705132823 1.2.2.2 Debate in the United States Debate has been important in the United States since the nation was founded in the late eighteenth century. The original governing body of the United States met in Philadelphia in Pennsylvania where that group of men debated among themselves, voicing various ideas about how the government of this new nation should be structured. Through argument and compromise, the group developed a document that became the Constitution of the United States.

1705132824

1705132825 Since that time, debates of various kinds have been common in the United States, especially in three arenas: legal, legislative, and political. In the legal arena, rules of argument and procedure are strict and lawyers must abide by the standards of the court as they present their arguments and counter arguments to judges and juries. In the legislative and political arenas, far fewer rules are codified, thus changes evolve through time and venue.

1705132826

1705132827 The first arena, the United States legal system, provides one of the most common venues for formal debate. Criminal trials (where a person or persons are accused of illegal activities) and civil trials (where a person or persons seek damages or remedy from another person or persons) consist of a series of arguments made by lawyers representing clients (although sometimes the clients serve as their own lawyers). Decisions—called verdicts—are made in some cases by a jury of peers and in some cases by a judge alone. The legal system is comprised of a series of levels of courts; sometimes litigants who lose in a lower court appeal the decision to a higher court. In the legal system, the verdict announced by the judge or jury serves as the final decision regarding the case.

1705132828

1705132829 The second arena, legislative debates, differs from legal debates in the United States. In the legislature, debaters are the elected officials within the local, state, and national jurisdictions. Guidelines for what a government official may or may not say in these debates are not as strict as are the rules for lawyers within a courtroom. In addition, elected officials at various levels throughout the government may retain researchers on staff to gather information or discover evidence. The debates supported by this research can extend for days or weeks during which multiple speakers will present opinions, information, arguments, historical reviews, and so on, one at a time. Legislative debates engage important decisions such as economic policies, social policies, environmental choices, or declarations of war.

1705132830

1705132831 In the third arena, political debates occur in various settings and various formats in the United States. Debates at a local level can occur between candidates for city mayor or candidates for the local school board, for example. Often communities facing controversial issues involving civic problems such as school zoning or taxes or building a new community center will schedule a public debate with speakers representing different sides of the questions to an audience of community members who sometimes also engage in the debate.

1705132832

1705132833 Political debates in the United States also occur at the national level. The Great Debates of 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, both candidates for Senator from the state of Illinois, became famous historical events consisting of seven debates dealing with the controversial topic of slavery. Candidates for President also debate one another. In 1960, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon participated in the first, nationally televised presidential debate. Since that time, presidential debates have occurred near Election Day featuring all the viable candidates running for office. In these debates, formats vary, but often moderators ask a question to which each candidate responds, promoting their own perspective and refuting the other candidate. Sometimes the candidates speak directly to each other, making arguments or counter arguments. The television audience reaction to the debates can affect the outcome of the election.

1705132834

1705132835 While debates in the United States often reveal crucial differences in candidates’ positions and preferences, not all legal, legislative, or political debates produce positive and useful results. Candidates unused to debating can falter or misstep; information can be presented that later will be determined to be false evidence; candidates can deviate from the central topic and engage in character attacks. In some cases where the debates are televised, the camera is kinder to some candidates than others, generating problems for the candidate with a poor visual presence. In short, some of these debates depart sharply from the kind of ethical, social debate promoted in this textbook.

1705132836

1705132837 Debate in the United States remains a vital form for examining and managing disputes. In the fifty years since the first Presidential debates aired, audiences in the United States have become more attuned to the purposes of these important debates and more critical of poor or unethical performances. Many audience members now expect candidates to be prepared, ethical, skilled, intelligent and thoughtful.

1705132838

1705132839 思辨精英：英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132291]

1705132840 1.3 Contemporary Developments in Argumentation, Debate, and Persuasion

1705132841

1705132842 As the various cultures of the world have become more accessible to one another through the Internet, increased opportunities for global travel, and more complex international relationships among economies and governments, the need for intercultural understanding and exchange has amplified. Negotiations among individuals and groups of various philosophical or cultural positions can stall when inherent values compete. The study and practice of debate has spread throughout the world as a viable means for investigating, airing, comparing, contrasting, and engaging those differences, differences that otherwise might lead to violence. Debate has shown itself to be a reasoned, thoughtful, and intelligent means for working through contentious issues by thoroughly examining the complex facets of those issues and, in some cases, calling in third party adjudicators to render decisions.

1705132843

1705132844 Much of the world debate community still draws from a fundamentally Greco-Roman core of debate features that calls for claims, arguments, reasoning, and evidence. Authors of this text, while working to include various cultural traditions, largely rely on the Western body of study called “argumentation” to explain issues such as reasoning fallacies, case construction, and audience analysis, for example. The authors recognize that these predominant themes emerge from the Greco-Roman core and continue to work toward inclusive ways to infuse global debate with multicultural means of making meaning, persuading, promoting understanding among debaters, and finding good ways to reconcile difficult global issues.

1705132845

1705132846 In addition, the authors recognize that differences other than national culture also can privilege or disadvantage certain groups of readers. In the research section of this textbook, for example, attention is given to research done on the Internet where debaters engage such useful sources as Lexus-Nexus or Google Scholar. Such suggestions, obviously, ignore the real circumstance that the large majority of people in the world do not have access to such luxuries as the Internet. Underlying assumptions in these discussions in this textbook, then, presume that the case for one group is the case for all groups. Because of these varying perspectives and value systems, providing educational information in a way that does not privilege one group over another or one philosophy over another can, at times, present antithetical challenges. Regardless of these challenges, authors of this text and other scholars continue to seek inclusive ways to accomplish the goal of human beings making excellent global decisions in nonviolent ways. The authors acknowledge that providing instruction to all cultures, all socio-economic classes, and all political credos demands ongoing, dynamic reconstruction of curriculum toward inclusion of all voices. Revised editions of this textbook will continually address this changing status.

1705132847

1705132848 Toward that end of evolutionary change, a view of contemporary rhetorical developments from the prospective of Chinese rhetoric is critical to students using this textbook so those students may better understand how to read and interpret the information presented. Since any culture’s rhetoric, with the aim of being persuasive, is never developed in a vacuum, that rhetoric has been heavily influenced by that culture’s political mechanisms, philosophical traditions and cultural contexts. Just as seminal works in the Greco-Roman tradition have shaped rhetoric in the West, seminal works in China have been influential on rhetoric in China. Since this textbook approaches argumentation and debate fundamentally from a Greco-Roman core, students who use this textbook benefit from following Chinese perspective on that approach.

1705132849

1705132850 Because Confucianism and Taoism are mainstream philosophies loyal to hierarchies and traditions in China’s long history, contemporary rhetoric in China, which often shares the fabric of Chinese philosophies, developed on a disparate track from Western rhetoric. Some comparative studies have been conducted on Chinese oratory (Oliver, 1971), but more often than not, because of the “dichotomies of antonymic concepts such as originality versus conventionality, rationality versus assertive discourse, cogency versus repetitive indirection,” Chinese rhetoric has been “consistently associated with the negative terms” (Liu, 1996: 318-335). More recent scholarship suggests using less ethnocentric assessment tools for analysis results in more generative, forward-thinking, and useful understandings of these dichotomies of thought.

1705132851

1705132852 Recent years have witnessed abundant comparative studies claiming more commonalities than discrepancies between Chinese and Western persuasive techniques, commonalities remarkably produced in the contexts of radically different languages. One author uses these studies to argue that rhetoric may represent an inherent commonality among human beings: “It would appear that universal rhetorical elements exist and that these elements connect humans of different cultures, building a bridge across the communication gaps between them” (Lu, 1998: 30). Toward that same conclusion, philosopher Richard J. Bernstein writes that “[incommensurable] languages and traditions are not to be thought of as self-contained windowless monads that share nothing in common… There are always points of overlap and crisscrossing even if there is not perfect commensuration” (Lu, 1998: 85-103). These scholars suggest these points of shared experiences provide starting points for developing mutually acceptable means for nonviolent decision-making processes.

1705132853

1705132854 However, while appreciating the commonalities among these rhetorical features, the authors acknowledge the lack of propriety and fairness in a process of canonizing one rhetorical culture, imposing its framework to analyze another, namely using the Greco-Roman system to parse Chinese discourses. Students reading this textbook—students both from China and from the United States—can remember that the tools designed from and used for analysis of Western persuasive strategies can assess Chinese passages only as those passages do or do not comply with the philosophies inherent in the design of the tools. An important argument can be made that such an application of Greco-Roman argumentation may not necessarily be applicable to Chinese passages.

1705132855

1705132856 To more clearly illuminate the problem of assessing one culture’s production with the tools of another culture, one can simply ask this question: What if Chinese persuasive strategies were used to assess Western ones? A similar disconnect might occur. The very presentation of different rhetorical styles inherently calls up the different bases of cultural values used to shape those styles. Recognition and understanding of those basic differences provide a beginning from which a debater may develop the art of global debate toward discovering ways for human beings to move forward through intelligent, thoughtful, and ethical interchange among cultures.

1705132857

1705132858 Regarding the differences between Chinese and Greco-Roman rhetoric, metaphor, analogies, and appeals to authoritative testimonies are far more prevalent in Chinese persuasive discourse than are deductive and inductive methods of reasoning used in Western argumentation; to establish the latter as the orthodox system is to eclipse the unique and intrinsic nature of the former. Just as scholarship has emerged from Greco-Roman scholars studying their own rhetorical practices, so have research projects studied the virtues of Chinese rhetoric in its own terms and structures. For instance, Qu (2009: 61-71) uses Qi to describe the inexplicable intricacies in Chinese discourse, intricacies that constitute a key concept that “dominates and orchestrates the rhetorical practice”. In another example, Mao (2007: 216-237) explored the “yin-yang” concept that was “rhetorically important in ancient China”.

1705132859

1705132860 One key with regard to multicultural diversities and commonalities in persuasive discourses, then, is to create an amalgam of systems where, for example, the culturally specific virtues of multiple cultures, such as the virtues of Chinese persuasive discourses, are honored. Both Chinese students and Western students can gain value by learning about Western argumentation and Chinese rhetorical culture. If a student from either culture wishes to communicate effectively across cultural borders, then each culture has much to learn from the other. Bonds between nations already have tightened cultures and societies into one global community where treaties govern currency exchange and international business, environment protection, the World Wide Web, etc. Effective, ethical debate provides a means to use persuasive dialogues to seek out conflict resolution measures rather than resorting to violence as peoples work toward agreements regarding various, critical, global decisions to be made. These dialogues can facilitate cross-cultural and transnational communication within the present, unprecedented, globally integrated situation, promoting a better understanding of and respect for each other’s rhetorical cultures.

1705132861

1705132862 This understanding is especially important for the younger generation in China and the United States. If China’s voice is to be heard and to be better understood by the Western world and if the voice of the Western world is to be better understood by China, Chinese practices and Western practices by the younger generations need to engage ethical and effective argumentation strategies, negotiating a global system that better incorporates multiple voices. Such actions would comply with the words of Chinese Rhetorician Liu Yameng (1999: 297-315), who sought “to justify my positions in your terms”. That multiplicity of knowing might help surmount obstacles resulting from cultural differences but also may operate as models for others seeking better communication and more effective decision-making between people of different cultures.

1705132863

[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.705132814e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]