1705133159
1705133160
一场好的辩论必须要恪守道德的原则。中美两国的哲学家都强调过道德和正义在辩论与演讲中的重要性。辩手们不管是在比赛还是训练中，都要注意自己的言行，培养道德准则，从而提高辩论的水平。
1705133161
1705133162
辩论中的道德问题涉及到论据的使用以及推理和论证的过程。然而，赢得辩论（有时不惜任何代价）和通过理性互动解决社会需求这两个不同目标产生的冲突会导致问题复杂化。辩手们可以在深入讨论和个案思考中更加坚定自己的道德立场，在积累辩论经验和技巧的同时提高自己的道德水平。
1705133163
1705133164
在选择论证和推理模式时，也常常需要在不计代价地获得胜利和成就深入实用的辩论间做出抉择。“真实”的论点不一定是道德的，因为辩手可以选择性地整理、组织论据，从而引导并最终说服观众。道德的辩手以高尚的、道德的思想交锋这一高标准要求自己，并以此指导道德的论证和推理。
1705133165
1705133166
建立辩手之间相互平等的关系，需要辩手们与不同的队友合作，听取不同意见，甚至高效地记录下来。道德的辩手们在语言和肢体动作上尽力展现自己的尊重。要尊重裁判，但这并不妨碍辩手和裁判就辩论结果进行交流。这些交流将给辩手提供新鲜有用的信息，使其今后在类似场合得以合理选择论证和推理方式。
1705133167
1705133168
有道德的辩手在辩论中追求思想的交锋，而不会发起人身攻击。研究最关键的冲突才能呈现一场实用且有启发性的辩论。辩手们可以通过定期参加比赛的方式，来提高自己在辩论中的道德水平。未来世界很有可能因为人与人之间的差异而产生各种可预见的问题。此时，作为世界公民的有道德的辩手可以承担起寻找解决办法的重任，帮助人们用周到的手段处理矛盾，避免暴力。
1705133169
1705133171
2.5 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 2
1705133172
1705133173
Check your memory and comprehension by describing or defining these key terms and concepts:
1705133174
1705133175
· Chengyan
1705133176
1705133177
· Ethos
1705133178
1705133179
· Four features of debate
1705133180
1705133181
· Role of adjudicator
1705133182
1705133183
· Ethical guidelines for the use of evidence
1705133184
1705133185
· Ethical guidelines for arguments and reasoning
1705133186
1705133187
· Mutual equality
1705133188
1705133189
· Clash of ideas
1705133190
1705133191
· Global citizen
1705133192
1705133194
2.6 Discussion Questions for Chapter 2
1705133195
1705133196
· How are the points made by Aristotle, Quintilian, and Mencius alike with regard to ethical debate? How are they different?
1705133197
1705133198
· In what ways is each of the four essential features of debate important to the guidelines for ethical debate?
1705133199
1705133200
· What is the distinction between the topics or arguments in a debate and the speakers in the debate?
1705133201
1705133202
· Why do debates sometimes migrate away from topic and toward the speakers?
1705133203
1705133204
· Often debaters are called “opponents.” How is the term, “opponent,” problematic for ethical debaters? How might that term contribute to character attacks during debates? What other term might be more appropriate?
1705133205
1705133206
· Identify ways evidence or use of evidence might be clearly unethical. Why are they unethical?
1705133207
1705133208
· How is mutual equality signaled in a debate? What nonverbal cues might indicate one debater seems to perceive himself as superior to another? Is that message about the issue or the speaker?
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.705133159e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]