打字猴:1.70513321e+09
1705133210 · Relate observed or experienced episodes of disagreement between debaters and adjudicators, episodes that generated difficulty. How might respect be shown in those circumstances?
1705133211
1705133212 · Is everyone a global citizen? Why would it be important for a debater to position himself or herself as a global citizen? What if the issue were a local issue? Are local issues related to global issues? Global issues to local issues?
1705133213
1705133214 · What problems arise if debaters choose to be unethical or not as ethical as they could be? How would these actions function in everyday life after college?
1705133215
1705133216
1705133217
1705133218
1705133219 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132317]
1705133220 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 Chapter 3Concepts Fundamental to Debating
1705133221
1705133222 Robert Trapp
1705133223
1705133224 Chapter Outline
1705133225
1705133226 3.1 Two Sets of Related Concepts
1705133227
1705133228 3.2 Components of Arguments
1705133229
1705133230 3.3 Kinds of Claims
1705133231
1705133232 3.4 Claims and Supporting Material
1705133233
1705133234 3.5 Principles and Consequences as Means of Evaluation
1705133235
1705133236 3.6 Summary
1705133237
1705133238 3.7 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 3
1705133239
1705133240 3.8 Discussion Questions for Chapter 3
1705133241
1705133242 Students and teachers of debate need to have a common understanding of concepts that are central to debate. Some concepts have common meanings used in ordinary language and others do not. The following sections are intended to ensure that all readers of this text share a common understanding of some of the most important concepts.
1705133243
1705133244
1705133245
1705133246 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132318]
1705133247 3.1 Two Sets of Related Concepts
1705133248
1705133249 A clear understanding of key concepts is necessary prior to a more in-depth discussion of the general process of debating. Sometimes people use terms and concepts loosely and such lax use of those terms leaves debaters and judges alike confused.
1705133250
1705133251 Persuasion and debate are two of the most important concepts that need to be defined. These two constitute the first of the two sets of related concepts. The second set of concepts includes arguments and argumentation.
1705133252
1705133253 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132319]
1705133254 3.1.1 Persuasion and Debate
1705133255
1705133256 Persuasion and debate have much in common yet they are different in certain ways. Persuasion is a symbolic process that people use to convince others to change their position (or sometimes to reinforce their own current position) about some issue, idea, or action. Debate is a process in which at least two persons who are engaged in some kind of a conflict over ideas or actions use persuasion to try to resolve their disagreement.
1705133257
1705133258 Persuasion is the broader of these two related concepts. All persuasion does not include debate but all debate involves persuasion. Consider for instance, the case of a corporation advertising a product to the general public. Apple, for example, tries to convince consumers to purchase the iPhone, the iPod, or a Macintosh computer. Such an advertising campaign is clearly an example of persuasion, but hardly can be considered a debate. On the other hand, if a lawyer tries to convince a judge that her client is not guilty of a crime, the lawyer is directly engaged with another lawyer in a conflict of ideas and thus the two lawyers are in a debate. These two lawyers are trying to persuade the judge to resolve the disagreement (guilty or not guilty) in their favor. So, persuasion sometimes, but not always includes what is called debate but sometimes includes symbolic acts that are not in the category of debate.
1705133259
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70513321e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]