1705133715
Only a debater defending the opposite side of the motion as the speaker can request a point of information. In other words, the debaters supporting the motion can request points of information of members of the Opposition Teams, and vice versa. To request a point of information, a debater rises and politely says something like “Point of information please,” or “On that point.”
1705133716
1705133717
The debater giving the speech has the authority to accept or refuse the request for a point of information. If the request for a point of information is accepted, the person who has requested the point has a maximum of fifteen seconds to make the point. As stated earlier, the point can be a question, a statement, or an argument. Sometimes points of information are made to ask an opponent to clarify a position but more commonly, they are made to attempt to undermine an argument being made by the speaker. More will be said about points of information in Chapter 11.
1705133718
1705133719
思辨精英：英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132349]
1705133720
5.3 Responsibilities for Speakers in Worlds-Style Debate
1705133721
1705133722
Although points of information are a common occurrence in every speech in the debate, each speech contains elements that are unique to that speech. The following table explains the basic responsibilities of each debater. Following the table is a fuller explanation of the responsibilities of each speaker.
1705133723
1705133724
Speaker Responsibilities for Worlds-Style Debate
1705133725
1705133726
1705133727
1705133728
1705133729
1705133730
1705133731
1705133732
The following sections briefly describe the speeches given by each of the eight speakers listed in the previous table. Those very brief descriptions will be expanded in later chapters.
1705133733
1705133734
思辨精英：英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132350]
1705133735
5.3.1 Prime Minister
1705133736
1705133737
The debate begins with a seven-minute speech by the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has three basic responsibilities: 1) to define and interpret the motion, 2) to describe the approach the First Government Team will take, and 3) to develop the case for the motion. The first of those responsibilities, defining and interpreting the motion, is particularly important because it sets the stage for the entire debate. Defining and interpreting the motion are similar but subtly different processes. When defining the motion, the Prime Minister will explicitly define any ambiguous terms that might be contained in the motion. When interpreting the motion, the Prime Minister will then use those definitions, along with the motion as a whole, to focus and narrow the motion so that the rest of the debate can be productive.
1705133738
1705133739
So, the process of defining and interpreting the motion consists of defining any ambiguous terms, then focusing and narrowing the debate. The Prime Minster has the right to define and interpret the motion and the responsibility to do so in a reasonable fashion. If the Prime Minister’s interpretation is a poor one, the likely result will be a poor debate. In order to properly define and interpret the motion, the Prime Minster should: define any ambiguous terms in the motion; show how those definitions are reasonable ones and; interpret the motion by appropriately narrowing it in a way that will lead to a good and productive debate. More will be said about defining and interpreting the motion in Chapter 6 on constructing arguments for the First Government Team.
1705133740
1705133741
The second responsibility of the Prime Minister is to describe the approach that the First Government Team will take in the debate. That responsibility is most important in situations where the motion involves advocating a policy or action. In those cases, the Prime Minister’s interpretation may include a proposed policy or action. Sometimes, the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the debate will consist of a brief description of some course of action that the Government Team will defend. When the Prime Minister interprets the motion by describing a proposed policy or course of action, that interpretation sometimes is called a “model” or simply a “proposal.” The Prime Minister is not required to present a model, but may choose to do so when he or she wants to present a clear outline of the proposed policy or action.
1705133742
1705133743
The final responsibility of the Prime Minister is to construct a “case” for the motion. Simply stated, a case consists of one or more arguments supporting the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the motion. Therefore, the Prime Minister will outline the arguments supporting the interpretation and will develop each of those arguments. The Prime Minister need not present all of the arguments for the First Government Team. In many cases, the Prime Minister will state that the First Government Team will have a certain number of arguments, and that the Deputy Prime Minister will present others.
1705133744
1705133745
The Prime Minister is responsible for presenting what is called a prima facie case. The phrase prima facie means literally “first face.” Thus, the Prime Minister must present a case that, on its first face, is convincing enough to support the motion. That the arguments presented constitute a prima facie case does not mean that they are so strong they cannot be refuted. Nor does prima facie mean that those arguments constitute the totality of the arguments that can and will be used to support the motion. Simply put, a prima facie case is one that is strong enough to convince a reasonable audience prior to any refutation being brought against it.
1705133746
1705133747
思辨精英：英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132351]
1705133748
5.3.2 Leader of Opposition
1705133749
1705133750
Before considering the primary responsibilities of the Leader of Opposition, a few words about how the Leader should react to the Prime Minister’s definition and interpretation of the motion are in order. In most ordinary situations, the Leader of Opposition should explicitly accept the definition and interpretation of the motion as presented by the Prime Minister. In extraordinary cases, when the definition is completely unreasonable as to preclude meaningful debate, the Leader of Opposition has the right to reject the definition. The problem with rejecting the definition is that such an action will ultimately lead to a very bad debate for which the First Opposition Team must share the responsibility with the First Government Team who introduced the unreasonable interpretation in the first place. Therefore, even in the event of an unreasonable definition, the Leader of Opposition should point out to the judge and the audience that the definition and interpretation presented by the Prime Minister is unreasonable, but then should go ahead and accept the definition for the purposes of the current debate.
1705133751
1705133752
After considering the definition and interpretation offered by the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition has three primary responsibilities: 1) to establish the stance that both Opposition Teams will pursue throughout the debate, 2) to refute part or all of the Prime Minister’s case, and 3) to present one or more arguments in opposition to the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the motion. No “rule” indicates that these responsibilities must be carried out in a particular order. The order is completely at the discretion of the debater. Sometimes a situation will call for beginning with refutation and then proceeding to argument construction, and sometimes a savvy debater will begin by constructing arguments then proceeding to refutation. In fact, especially advanced debaters are sometimes able to weave refutation and construction into a tapestry that creates a seamless fabric of argument.
1705133753
1705133754
As the responsibilities of the Leader of Opposition and the rest of the speakers are explained, one point needs to be made clear. The responsibilities can be carried out in a variety of ways. Each responsibility can be addressed individually, or they can be woven together into a tapestry of argumentation. The main point is that the responsibilities are derived from the logical and persuasive functions of a speech, not from some arbitrary rule-driven calculus. How these responsibilities are carried out is a judgment made by each individual speaker. Having explained that each responsibility can be carried out in a variety of ways, the remainder of the discussion of each speaker’s responsibilities, for the sake of clarity, will be detailed as if they were separate and independent responsibilities.
1705133755
1705133756
First, the Leader of Opposition should establish a stance that both Opposition Teams will pursue throughout the debate. This responsibility is similar to the Prime Minister’s responsibility to interpret and narrow the motion for the debate. Certainly, the Leader of Opposition is not in a position to restrict the arguments that the Second Opposition Team will present, but the Leader of Opposition, nevertheless, has the right and the responsibility to describe the general direction that both Opposition Teams will take. Chapter 7 will note that the Leader of Opposition can choose among several alternatives: 1) defending the present situation, 2) defending the present situation with minor alterations, or 3) constructing an alternate proposal that is different from both the present situation and the Government Team’s proposal. The point made here is that, if the Leader of Opposition chooses any one of those three alternatives, both the First and Second Opposition Teams are obliged to follow those alternatives in the same way that the Second Government Team is obliged to follow the interpretation advanced by the First Government team. If the First Opposition Team chooses to explicitly defend the present situation, the Second Opposition Team cannot simultaneously be loyal to the First Opposition and abandon a defense of the present situation to pursue an alternative proposal.
1705133757
1705133758
Second, the Leader of Opposition should refute part or all of the Prime Minister’s arguments for the motion. Because of the limits of time, the Leader of Opposition cannot reasonably expect to refute all of the Prime Minister’s arguments. The proper goal is to select and refute the most important arguments presented by the Prime Minister. More will be said about refutation in Chapter 10.
1705133759
1705133760
Third, and most importantly, the Leader of Opposition should present one, two, or three arguments directed against the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the motion. Those arguments are different from the arguments offered in refutation. They should consist of the most persuasive reasons that the Leader of Opposition can present to convince the audience to reject the motion as interpreted by the Prime Minister.
1705133761
1705133762
思辨精英：英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132352]
1705133763
5.3.3 Deputy Prime Minister
1705133764