1705135270
· External method of refutation
1705135271
1705135272
· RSA triangle
1705135273
1705135274
· Acceptability
1705135275
1705135276
· Relevance
1705135277
1705135278
· Sufficiency
1705135279
1705135280
· Counter-argument
1705135281
1705135282
· Four-step refutation process
1705135283
1705135284
· Five-step rebuilding process
1705135285
1705135287
10.5 Discussion Questions for Chapter 10
1705135288
1705135289
· How is refutation used in the process of rebuilding an argument?
1705135290
1705135291
· How are the internal and external methods of refutation different from one another?
1705135292
1705135293
· What are the three standards that distinguish good arguments from poor ones? How do they function in the process of refutation?
1705135294
1705135295
· How might a debater decide which arguments are important enough to refute?
1705135296
1705135297
· What is the four-step method of refutation?
1705135298
1705135299
· What is the five-step method of rebuilding an argument?
1705135300
1705135302
10.6 Exercises for Chapter 10
1705135303
1705135304
· Exercise 1:
1705135305
1705135306
Refutation: This exercise involves two students. Have the first student present a two-minute speech that offers one argument in support of some action or proposal. Have the second student present one point of refutation in response to this argument. This refutation should carefully follow the four-step refutation process.
1705135307
1705135308
1705135309
1705135310
· Exercise 2:
1705135311
1705135312
Refutation: This exercise involves one student constructing an argument and several other students responding to that argument. One student will present a five-minute speech that involves two or three arguments in support of some action or proposal. The other students will, using the four-step method of refutation, construct at least three points of refutation about the arguments in the speech. Then, the group will discuss the points of refutation.
1705135313
1705135314
1705135315
1705135316
·Exercise 3:
1705135317
1705135318
Refutation and rebuilding: This exercise involves two or three students. Have the first student present a two-minute speech that offers one argument in support of some action or proposal. Have the second student present one point of refutation in response to this argument. The refutation should carefully follow the four-step refutation process. Then either the first or the third student will carefully rebuild the original argument using the five-step rebuilding process.
1705135319
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70513527e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]