1705136011
1705136012
Robert Trapp
1705136013
1705136014
Chapter Outline
1705136015
1705136016
15.1 Claims
1705136017
1705136018
15.2 Exceptions
1705136019
1705136020
15.3 Summary
1705136021
1705136022
15.4 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 15
1705136023
1705136024
15.5 Discussion Questions for Chapter 15
1705136025
1705136026
15.6 Exercises for Chapter 5
1705136027
1705136028
Debate is a process in which individuals exchange arguments about controversial topics. Debate could not exist without arguments. Arguments are the substance of debate. Of course, debates can include more than arguments. Some debates also include humor, stories, and appeals to emotion. In some unfortunate cases, debates may even include verbal aggression and threats. The aim of this text is to support substantive debate, focused primarily on argumentation.
1705136029
1705136030
1705136031
1705136032
A description of argumentation should account for the elements of argument and how those elements relate to one another. The next three chapters will focus on four elements of argument: claims, evidence, links, and exceptions.1This chapter will consider claims and exceptions.
1705136033
1705136034
Some beginning students of argumentation mistakenly believe that the elements of argument must be presented in a particular order. However, the arrangement of elements into a particular structure does not dictate the order in which each of the elements must be presented. Sometimes, presenting the claim and following it with supporting reasons and evidence is the most persuasive way to present an argument. At other times, an argument may be persuasively presented by starting with evidence then leading up to the claim. The following is a discussion of the structure of an argument, although not necessarily in the order in which the elements should be organized.
1705136035
1705136037
15.1 Claims
1705136038
1705136039
A claim is the main point or the thesis of an argument. A claim is based on or supported by explicit evidence.2 As people argue, they present evidence designed to persuade their audiences or judges to accept their claim. A claim can either be the conclusion that the debater wishes the audience or judge to accept, or it can be evidence for a subsequent claim.
1705136040
1705136041
Sometimes, a claim involves simply a movement from evidence to a conclusion, as illustrated in the following diagram:
1705136042
1705136043
1705136044
1705136045
1705136046
In this case, evidence is used to convince an audience to accept a claim; audience acceptance of the claim is the primary goal of the debater. An example of evidence being used to produce a claim is presented in the following diagram:
1705136047
1705136048
1705136049
1705136050
1705136051
Here, the claim that the debater wants the audience to accept is, “Smoking should be banned in public places.” That claim is supported by evidence suggesting “Second-hand smoke contributes to health problems for children.”
1705136052
1705136053
In other instances, claims are used to produce other claims. For example, evidence is used to produce Claim 1, then Claim 1is used to convince an audience or judge to accept yet another claim. Thus, Claim 1 produced by the evidence was not the debater’s ultimate goal. Here, Claim 2 is the ultimate goal, but Claim 1 was necessary to convince the audience of Claim 2. For example:
1705136054
1705136055
1705136056
1705136057
1705136058
The above example demonstrates how one piece of evidence can be used to produce one claim, and how that claim can be used to produce yet a second claim. Of course, many different combinations exist where claims are used to convince an audience of subsequent claims. The following is another example:
1705136059
1705136060
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.705136011e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]