1705137640
Appendix A—CHECK SHEET FOR HOSTING A DEBATE TOURNAMENT
1705137641
1705137642
Appendix B—TOURNAMENT INVITATION TEMPLATE
1705137643
1705137644
Appendix C—TABULATION TASKS FOR EACH DEBATE
1705137645
1705137646
Appendix D—SAMPLE JUDGE HANDOUT
1705137647
1705137648
Appendix E—SAMPLE TOURNAMENT ENTRY FORM
1705137649
1705137650
Hosting a debate tournament on a campus can provide a number of benefits for students, teachers, and the institution, but a successful tournament requires careful planning and organization. While this chapter focuses on information that is most useful for hosting a large debate tournament with judges and teams from many different schools participating, the suggestions are also applicable to intra-campus competitions or other smaller debate events with a more limited number of participants.
1705137651
1705137652
1705137653
1705137654
Whether the tournament is large or small, sufficient planning and preparation in the months leading up to the event are necessary for the tournament to be successful. The information in this chapter is designed to provide a basic understanding of tournament preparation and operations, and contains several appendices with supplemental information to assist in the planning and running of a debate tournament. Larger debate events, in particular, demand a great deal of planning and preparation, so, information such as the “CHECK SHEET FOR HOSTING A DEBATE TOURNAMENT” (Appendix A) should be particularly helpful for individuals planning to host larger debate events.
1705137655
1705137657
23.1 Benefits of Hosting a Tournament
1705137658
1705137659
A debate tournament provides many benefits to students, teachers, and the institution as a whole. Students can participate in a tournament in a number of ways. First and foremost, many students will have the opportunity to debate, and refine their public speaking, critical thinking, and listening skills. Students can also learn a great deal from watching others debate, so the experiences that tournaments provide for audience members should not be overlooked. For instance, a tournament might offer five to six rounds of debate in which students who are new to debate can watch and practice their listening and note-taking skills. Some advanced students may also have opportunities to serve as judges during the tournament. Students and other community members can serve as volunteers in support of the event, in roles such as timers, ballot runners, tabulation room assistants, registration assistants, and hospitality staff.
1705137660
1705137661
Debate tournaments also provide a number of benefits for teachers. By fostering friendly competition among schools, debate tournaments inspire students and faculty alike to practice techniques that will strengthen their ability to argue persuasively in both speaking and writing. Faculty members who serve as Chairs of judging panels at debate tournaments get the added benefits of judging and developing stronger academic ties with colleagues from other institutions. Because judges have to reach a consensus about the ranking of the teams, participation in judging a tournament directly increases dialogue among faculty about issues such as effective argument construction and debate strategy. In addition, with higher demands from university students for more diversified content-based courses and increasing pressure on teachers to reform traditional oral English teaching in China, tournaments provide a platform for students to practice what they have learned in public speaking or debate classes.
1705137662
1705137663
With all of those benefits to students and faculty, the institution as a whole clearly gains a great deal. Additionally, student success at debate tournaments in the form of individual speaker awards and team awards for semi-finalists and finalists brings honor to a university. More importantly, debate fosters a culture of inquiry and dialogue that is an important element in all fields of academic research. Students and teachers who have regular opportunities to practice their critical thinking and speaking skills through debate become better speakers and writers, and those are skills which can be used to present and publish academic research.
1705137664
1705137666
23.2 Tournament Logistics
1705137667
1705137668
Before deciding to host a tournament, the potential host should consider logistics such as the size, location, and space requirements of the tournament. This section discusses tournament size, along with a variety of issues surrounding space requirements.
1705137669
1705137671
23.2.1 Tournament Size and Location
1705137672
1705137673
The size and location of a debate tournament are important because they are factors that will affect all aspects of planning, including the number of rounds offered, the number of judges required, and the number of rooms needed. For the purpose of this section, “tournament size” is defined as the number of teams participating in the event. The tournament size directly affects the number of rooms and judges that will be required.
1705137674
1705137675
The number of debating rooms is determined by the tournament size. A tournament requires one room for every four teams. Thus, for a tournament consisting of forty teams, ten rooms would be required. Rooms for the debate tournament should also be adequate in size to seat at least twelve people (eight debaters, three judges, and a timer). Larger rooms that can also accommodate additional audience members are desirable if they are available.
1705137676
1705137677
The number of judges needed depends on the size of the tournament, as does the number of judges required for each debate. The standard number of judges for a debate is three: one Chair judge and two “panelist” judges. If enough judges cannot be found, the tournament host may choose to use two judges (a Chair and a “wing”) instead of three. To estimate the number of judges needed, the tournament director must first project the total number of teams (N) in the tournament, then divide the total number of teams by 4 (N/4) to determine the number of debates. If the tournament has a total of 40 teams, the projected number of debates (40/4) would be 10. If the tournament has a total of 100 teams, the projected number of debates (100/4) would be 25. For tournaments using three judges per debate, the number of required judges is equal to the projected number of debates multiplied by three. So, a 40-team tournament would require 30 judges, whereas a 100-team tournament would require 75 judges.
1705137678
1705137679
Using three judges per debate is clearly the preferred standard, but sometimes a tournament director may decide that he or she cannot locate that many judges and, thus, will use only two judges per debate (a Chair and a “wing”). In that case, the number of judges needed is determined by multiplying the number of debates by two. So, a 40-team tournament with 10 debates will require 20 (rather than 30) judges and a 100-team tournament will require 50 (rather than 75) judges.
1705137680
1705137682
23.2.2 Space Requirements
1705137683
1705137684
In addition to a certain number of debating rooms, which was discussed in the previous section, the following are some of the additional space requirements that a tournament host needs to provide: a central gathering area, a registration area, a ballot distribution area, and a tabulation room.
1705137685
1705137686
23.2.2.1 Central Gathering Area A central gathering area is needed for all but very small tournaments because it provides a place for pre-tournament competitor and judge trainings, as well as a place for the announcement of topics and posting of the “draw.” The draw shows how the teams are matched for each round, including the names of all four teams, their positions in the debate, the names of the judges, and the room in which the debate will occur. The draw may simply be a sheet of paper posted with the listing of the debates for any given round, or it may be an electronic posting that is projected onto an overhead screen. The draw must include the names of each team and their position in the debate, as well as the names of the judges and the assigned rooms for each debate. A large central gathering location (like a lecture hall or an auditorium) provides enough space for everyone to read the draw for each round, and to sit during the announcement of the motion and during the times between rounds.
1705137687
1705137688
23.2.2.2 Registration Area The tournament requires a registration area that is positioned very near the central gathering area. It should contain enough tables to comfortably accommodate several volunteers who will conduct the registration. At tournament registration, at least three volunteers will be needed to assist with the registration process. Those volunteers will instruct each school to verify the number of teams and judges entered in the tournament and the accuracy of the participants’ names.
1705137689
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70513764e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]