1706553758
[86] Appian,Roman History [inc. Civil Wars],ed. & tr. H. White. 4 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1912-13,8.18.122-123。
1706553759
1706553760
[87] Appian,Roman History [inc. Civil Wars],ed. & tr. H. White. 4 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1912-13,8.18.124-126。
1706553761
1706553762
[88] Polybius,The Histories,ed. & tr. W. Paton. 6 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1922-7,38.7.1-38.8.10.
1706553763
1706553764
[89] Polybius,The Histories,ed. & tr. W. Paton. 6 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1922-7,38.8.13。
1706553765
1706553766
[90] Polybius,The Histories,ed. & tr. W. Paton. 6 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1922-7,38.8.7,38.8.11-12。
1706553767
1706553768
[91] Appian,Roman History [inc. Civil Wars],ed. & tr. H. White. 4 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1912-13,8.18.118.
1706553769
1706553770
[92] 波利比乌斯生平之简述见Appian,Roman History [inc. Civil Wars],ed. & tr. H. White. 4 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1912-13,8.18.118。
1706553771
1706553772
[93] Appian,Roman History [inc. Civil Wars],ed. & tr. H. White. 4 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1912-13,8.19.132.西庇阿引用的句子见Homer,Iliad,ed. & tr. A. Murray & W. Wyatt. 2 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1999,6.448-449。
1706553773
1706553774
[94] Harris,W. 1979 War and Imperialism in Republican Rome:327-70 B.C. Oxford,240-244,他将此事视为主要是在罗马元老院的极力挑拨下引发的又一起外交事件。埃林顿(1971,236-240)将大部分责任归咎于亚加亚联盟新领袖阶层的缺乏经验与鲁莽冒动。
1706553775
1706553776
[95] Eutropius(‘Eutrope’),Abrégé d’histoire romaine [An Abridged History of Rome],ed. & French tr. J. Hellegouarch. Paris,1999,4.12.2;Diodorus Siculus,The Library of History,ed. & tr. C. Oldfather et al. 12 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1960-67,13.90;Cicero,The Verrine Orations,ed. & tr. L. Greenwood. 2 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1928-35,2.2.86-7,2.4.72-83;Valerius Maximus(‘Valère Maxime’),Faits et dits mémorables [Memorable Deeds and Sayings],ed. & French tr. R. Combès. 2 vols. Paris,1995-7,5.1.6.
1706553777
1706553778
[96] 尽管并无证据表明,在这座城市被摧毁之后二十多年间,罗马人一直在侵占迦太基人的领土,但有人指出,针对迦太基人的土地所进行的全面深入的测量工作,几乎是在迦太基被夷平的同时就开始了。见Wightman,E. 1980 ‘The Plan of Roman Carthage:Practicalities and Politics’,in J. Pedley(ed.)1980 New Light on Ancient Carthage. Ann Arbor.,34-36。
1706553779
1706553780
[97] Purcell,N. 1995 ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’,in D. Innes,H. Hine & C. Pelling(eds.)1995 Ethics and Rhetoric:Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford,133.
1706553781
1706553782
[98] 这种联系显然是后世的作家如西塞罗(Agr. 2.87)和李维(26.34.9)提出的。
1706553783
1706553784
[99] Purcell,N. 1995 ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’,in D. Innes,H. Hine & C. Pelling(eds.)1995 Ethics and Rhetoric:Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford,134-135.后世罗马人对迦太基所遭受的命运所做的不积极的辩解见Purcell,N. 1995 ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’,in D. Innes,H. Hine & C. Pelling(eds.)1995 Ethics and Rhetoric:Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford,145-146。
1706553785
1706553786
[100] Purcell,N. 1995 ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’,in D. Innes,H. Hine & C. Pelling(eds.)1995 Ethics and Rhetoric:Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford,143。
1706553787
1706553788
[101] 加图的很多历史观点都是建立在费边·皮克托著作的基础上的。对于埃涅阿斯神话与罗马人是特洛伊人后代的传说,他也照单全收(Gruen,E. 1992 Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca,NY,33-34)。
1706553789
1706553790
[102] Astin,A. 1978 Cato the Censor. Oxford,217.
1706553791
1706553792
[103] Astin,A. 1978 Cato the Censor. Oxford,227-231。尽管据说加图对希腊文化的某些方面嗤之以鼻,但就这部著作而言,他似乎依旧遵循的是蒂迈欧的模式,不过两者间有一个重要区别。与希腊裔西西里作家试图将意大利和罗马放到辽阔的地中海中部的背景下加以介绍的做法相反,加图倾向于凸显罗马在意大利的中心地位。
1706553793
1706553794
[104] Astin,A. 1978 Cato the Censor. Oxford,213-216.
1706553795
1706553796
[105] Aulus Gellius,Attic Nights,ed. & tr. J. Rolfe. 3 vols. Cambridge,Mass.,1961-8,10.1.10.
1706553797
1706553798
[106] Feeney,D. 1991 The Gods in Epic:Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford,99.
1706553799
1706553800
[107] Feeney,D. 1991 The Gods in Epic:Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford,99.
1706553801
1706553802
[108] Gruen,E. 1990 Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden,92-106;Goldberg,S. 1995 Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford,32-36.
1706553803
1706553804
[109] 奈维乌斯和恩尼乌斯的传记和著作见Gruen,E. 1990 Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden,92-106;Goldberg,S. 1995 Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford,32-36.
1706553805
1706553806
[110] 在奈维乌斯的著作中,神话传说和近期发生的事件紧密地交织在一起,以至于有人认为,《布匿战纪》中的一个描述巨人与英雄之间的战斗的著名桥段,实际上呈现的是位于西西里阿克拉伽斯城宙斯神庙东面的三角墙上的一块雕带上的场景(Fraenkel,E. 1954 ‘The Giants in the Poem of Naevius’,Journal of Roman Studies《罗马研究杂志》,1416;Feeney,D. 1991 The Gods in Epic:Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford,118)。
1706553807
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.706553758e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]