1700079362
战争艺术史 注释
1700079363
1700079364
第一篇 查理曼及其继承者
1700079365
1700079366
1 查理曼
1700079367
1700079368
1.Lex Ripuaria（Ripuarian Law），36.11.M.G. LL.，5.231.
1700079369
1700079370
2.A cow is equated to 1 solidus. The expression “3 solidi，” which we find in one of the manuscripts, is obviously false, since an ox is counted as 2 solidi and a mare as 3. In a capitulary of Louis the Pious of the year 829，a cow is indicated in one place as the equivalent of 2 solidi.
1700079371
1700079372
3.（Note to the second edition）. The economic base of the Carolingian military organization is, as shown in Vol.Il, a barter economy. Alfons Dopsch, in his Economic Development of the Carolingian Period（Wirtschaftsentwicklung der Karolingerzeit），especially Vol. III, para.12，has recently claimed to prove that the generally accepted concept of this barter economy is incorrect and that there existed along with it a very considerable money economy. Consequently, he claims, the contrast between antiquity and the Middle Ages in this respect and in general is very overemphasized. I cannot agree with him. I find, on the contrary, the conclusions of my studies on the changes in military organization to be a new confirmation of the accepted concept. The transition from the Roman legionary to the medieval knight is not conceivable without the shift of the ancient money economy into a barter economy. See my review of Dopsch in the Deutsche Politik，26（1921）：620.“Römertum und Germanentum.”
1700079373
1700079374
4.The plebs urband（urban dwellers）were not considered as completely free in the Merovingian period. Brunner, German Legal History（Deutsche Recbtsgeschicbte），1：253，says: “We cannot determine with certainty how the decrease in freedom was expressed in a legal sense.”There can be no doubt that it is a question of the difference between the worrior and the nonwarrior. That point is not clear in Brunner because he believes, like Roth, in a general military obligation. According to the capitulary M.G. Capitularia Reg. Franc.，ed. Boretius，1：145，the tenant farmers were counted among the unfree men.
1700079375
1700079376
5.God. Kurth, in “The Nationalities in Auvergne”（“Les Nationalités en Auvergne”），Bulletin de la Classe des Lettres de l’Académie belgique，11（1899）: 769 and 4（1900）：224，proves with respect to Auvergne that no Franks at all settled there. In that region, even the great families holding the position of count were Romanics. Of almost all of the few Germans who appear in Auvergne, it can be proven that they did not settle there, except perhaps for a very few West Goths.
1700079377
1700079378
6.Numerous references in Guilhiermoz, Essai sur l’origine de la noblesse francaise, p.490.
1700079379
1700079380
7.Ancien Coutumier d’Anjou, Cited by Guilhiermoz, p.366.
1700079381
1700079382
8.Nithard IV, Chap.2.
1700079383
1700079384
9.Already explained by Boretius, Contributions to the Critique of the Capitularies（Beiträge zur Capitularienkritik），p.128，as a simple repetition from previous documents.
1700079385
1700079386
10.Cited by Baldamus in Tbe Military Organization under the Later Carolingians（Das Heerwesen unter den späteren Karolingern），p.12.
1700079387
1700079388
11.Hinkmar of Reims writes in the document against his nephew, the bishop of Laon（870）
:“De hoc quippe vitio superbiae descendit quod multi te apud plurimos dicunt de fortitudine et agilitate tui corporis gloriari et de praeliis, atque, ut nostratum lingua dicitur, de vassaticis frequenter ac libenter sermonem habere, et qualiter agers si laicus fuisses irreverenter referre.”（“Certainly it comes from this sin of pride that many among the masses tell you to boast of your body’s strength and agility and of battles, and, as it is said in our language, to speak willingly and often with vassals and to reply disrespectfully, just as you would act if you had been a layman.”）I take this interesting extract of the document from Guilhiermoz, Essai sur l’origine de la noblesse française, p.438，where other examples of that special usage are also given.
1700079389
1700079390
12.Maitland, Domesday Book and Beyond，1891，p.511.
1700079391
1700079392
13.When it is reported in the Annales Bertin, for the year 869 that for the garrison of a newly erected fort Charles the Bald called up one gastalds（scaramannus: warrior without a fief）from every 100 hides of land and a wagon with two oxen from every 1，000 hides, this does not give us any specific number, since it was not known at the court how many hides there were in each county. Consequently, this is only a very approximate reference, like the levy by groups.
1700079393
1700079394
14.In his German and French Constitutional History（Deutsche und französische Verfassungsgeschichte），Ernst Mayer has no doubt recognized the contradiction in the source material, but the solution that he gives in Vol.I, p.123，is impossible. He claims that on the Rhine, in Bavaria, and in Gothic Southern France only the Germans took the field, whereas berween the Seine and the Loire the general military obligation applied also to the Romans. One can imagine how such a Roman militia would have shown up between the Franks and the Goths！
1700079395
1700079396
15.That also applies when, as we later find prescribed in the Weissenburg service law and elsewhere, the ministeriale was supposed to be provisioned by the curia after the crossing of the Alps. Baltzer, pp.69，73. Waitz 8：162.
1700079397
1700079398
16.A manuscript of the Theodon Capitulary of 805，Chap.5，contains the sentence: “et ut servi lancea non portent, et qui invents fuerit post bannum hasta frangatur in dorso ejus”（“and that the unfree should not carry lances, and a spear should be broken on the back of whoever was found doing so after the order”）. Waitz, Verfassungsgeschichte，1st ed.，4：454，interprets that to mean that the common soldiers who followed their lords to war were absolutely forbidden to carry the lance as their individual weapon. This interpretation is not acceptable. That chapter has to do with the bearing of weapons in peacetime（“in patria”: “in one’s own country”）and with the suppression of feuds. Freemen were forbidden to carry arms（shield, lance, and armor）in peacetime, but no specific punishment was provided. In the case of serving men, this prohibition was backed by a threat of punishment.
1700079399
1700079400
17.The source passages are to be found in Prenzel, Contributions to the History of Military Organization under the Carolingians（Beiträge zur Geschichte der Kriegswesens unter den Karolingern），Leipzig dissertation，1887，p.34，and in Waitz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte，4：455.
1700079401
1700079402
18.Multiple references are to be found in Guilhiermoz, p.245.
1700079403
1700079404
19.Annales Fuldenses（Annals of Fulda）for the year 894；Annales Altabenses（Annals of Niederalteich）for the year 1044：Thietmar，6：16.
1700079405
1700079406
20.Peez, in “The Travels of Charlemagne”（“Die Reisen Karls des Grossen”），Schmollers Jahrbücher fur Gesetzgebung，2（1891）：16，assembles all of Charlemagne’s travels and estimates that on the average he covered 1，100 miles each year of his reign. In the year 776 his travels amounted to almost 1，900 miles, and in 800 he covered almost 2，000 miles.
1700079407
1700079408
21.Imperial Courts in the Lippe, Rubr, and Diemel Areas（Reichshofe im Lippe-，Rubr-，und Diemelgebiet），1901. The Franks: Their System of Conquest and Settlement in the German Regions（Die Franken, ihr Eroberungsund Siedlungssystem im deutschen Volkslande），1904.
1700079409
1700079410
22.Brunner, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte，2：57 ff.，where all the source passages are also cited.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.700079361e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]