1705133311
3.4.1 Claim Supported by Evidence
1705133312
1705133313
The simplest way to think of an argument is that it involves a claim supported by evidence. Evidence is supporting material that has been observed or is potentially observable. The following diagram illustrates a claim supported by evidence:
1705133314
1705133315
1705133316
1705133317
1705133318
The above argument consists of evidence and a claim. The evidence is about observed data regarding the fossil record. The debater making this argument probably did not observe this data directly but read about the observation that was made by others, probably scientists.
1705133319
1705133321
3.4.2 Claim Supported by Explanation
1705133322
1705133323
Explanation is another way to support an argument. Sometimes an explanation is offered to reveal why the claim is a correct one. The following diagram illustrates this kind of claim:
1705133324
1705133325
1705133326
1705133327
1705133328
The claim that “Robert is afraid of snakes” becomes more believable when an explanation is offered to answer the question “Why is Robert afraid of snakes?”
1705133329
1705133331
3.4.3 Claim Supported by Analogy
1705133332
1705133333
An analogy is a form of supporting material where an advocate begins with an object or concept for which the audience already has a positive (or negative) evaluation, then compares that object or concept to another for which the audience has no such existing evaluation. The diagram below illustrates this kind of argument:
1705133334
1705133335
1705133336
1705133337
1705133338
In the above argument, the advocate presumes that the audience has a positive evaluation of Mahatma Gandhi. In particular, the advocate presumes that the audience considers Mahatma Gandhi one of India’s greatest leaders. Then the advocate makes an explicit comparison of Mahatma Gandhi and Narendra Modi. By making this comparison, the advocate creates an analogy that becomes supporting material for the claim that Narendra Modi is one of India’s greatest leaders.
1705133339
1705133341
3.4.4 Claim Supported by Other Claims
1705133342
1705133343
Frequently, claims are supported by other claims. Chapter 20 of this text will describe in greater depth the process of combining claims coherently to support other claims. This chapter will introduce the process of using claims to support other claims. The diagram below illustrates the basic process of using two claims to support a third:
1705133344
1705133345
1705133346
1705133347
1705133348
As this text will discuss more fully in Chapter 20, a frequent pattern of using claims to support other claims involves combining a descriptive claim with an associational claim to support an evaluative claim. The diagram below illustrates this basic pattern:
1705133349
1705133350
1705133351
1705133352
1705133353
Using this pattern, an advocate begins by describing (descriptive claim) some feature of the object or policy to be evaluated, then relates that feature to some effect or value (associational claim). Having described the feature and related the feature to an effect, the advocate is then in a position to evaluate the object or policy (evaluative claim).
1705133354
1705133355
An example of this pattern of using a descriptive and an associational claim to support an evaluative claim is shown in the following diagram:
1705133356
1705133357
1705133358
1705133359
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70513331e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]