1705137377
21.4 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 21
1705137378
1705137379
Check your memory and comprehension by describing or defining these key terms and concepts:
1705137380
1705137381
· Johnson and Blair Model of Argument Cogency
1705137382
1705137383
· Acceptability
1705137384
1705137385
· Relevance
1705137386
1705137387
· Sufficiency
1705137388
1705137389
· Problematic premises
1705137390
1705137391
· Begging the question
1705137392
1705137393
· Fallacy of incompatibility
1705137394
1705137395
· Fallacy of irrelevant reason
1705137396
1705137397
· Argument ad hominem
1705137398
1705137399
· Argument of straw
1705137400
1705137401
· Red herring fallacy
1705137402
1705137403
· Hasty conclusions
1705137404
1705137405
· Hasty generalization
1705137406
1705137407
· Slippery slope arguments
1705137408
1705137410
21.5 Discussion Questions for Chapter 21
1705137411
1705137412
· How are the three criteria contained in the Johnson and Blair Model of Argument Cogency related to the overall structure of an argument?
1705137413
1705137414
· Describe the three standards for argument acceptability.
1705137415
1705137416
· Compare and contrast the standards of relevance and sufficiency.
1705137417
1705137418
· What is the relationship between the absence or presence of fallacies and the cogency of arguments? Does the absence of a fallacy mean the argument is correct? Does the presence of a fallacy mean the argument is incorrect?
1705137419
1705137421
21.6 Exercise for Chapter 21
1705137422
1705137423
· Starting with any of the arguments presented in this text, analyze the arguments for how well they meet the three criteria continued in the Johnson and Blair Model of Argument Cogency. What specific fallacies, if any, do the arguments contain?
1705137424
1705137425
Notes
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.705137376e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]