打字猴:1.70003123e+09
1700031230
1700031231 迪绍甫在揭示这些效应的政治范畴方面迈出了一大步,但是他忽视了其美学维度。笔者认为,朗西埃意义上的美学转向有利于描述行动主义人工物是如何通过改变城市体验的环境促进社会变化的。
1700031232
1700031233 在融合这些视角的基础上,笔者提出了自己的框架。尽管这一框架并非完美无缺,但是朝着更全面的描述方向迈出了第一步。今后的城市设计工作和研究将会进一步充实这一框架。
1700031234
1700031235 [333]托马斯·马库森拥有比较文学与符号学的文学硕士学位、交互设计的博士学位,现任丹麦科灵设计学院传达设计系副教授,主要研究兴趣为设计行动主义、新媒体艺术和交互设计。
1700031236
1700031237 [334]Giovanna Borasi,Mirko Zardini, eds. Actions: What You Can Do with the City. Montréal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, 2008; Carl DiSalvo.“Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”. paper presented at the Design Research Society Conference, Montreal, July 7~9, 2010; Alistair Fuad-Luke. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. London: Routledge, 2009; Lize Mogel, Alexis Bhagat. An Atlas of Radical Cartography. Canada: Journal of Aesthetics & Protest Press, 2008; Ann Thorpe “Design as Activism: A Conceptual Tool”. paper presented at the Changing the Change Conference, Turin, Italy, July 10~12, 2008
1700031238
1700031239 [335]参见http://designactivism.net/等,2011年2月访问。
1700031240
1700031241 [336]Alistair Fuad-Luke. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness
1700031242
1700031243 [337]Thorpe.“Design as Activism”; DiSalvo.“Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”
1700031244
1700031245 [338]Brian Holmes.“Do-it-yourself Geopolitics”. In: Urban/Act: A Handbook for Alternative Practice, ed. atelier d’architecture autogérée, www.peprav.net/tool/IMG/pdf/URBAN-ACT_release.pdf,2010年2月访问。
1700031246
1700031247 [339]Jacques Rancière. The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2004; Jacques Rancière. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London & New York: Continuum, 2010
1700031248
1700031249 [340]Thorpe.“Design as activism”
1700031250
1700031251 [341]Fuad-Luke. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness. 81
1700031252
1700031253 [342]Fuad-Luke. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness. 10
1700031254
1700031255 [343]DiSalvo.“Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”
1700031256
1700031257 [344]参见Chantal Mouffe.“Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?”. Social Research, 1999, 66(3); Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 2001。
1700031258
1700031259 [345]DiSalvo.“Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”
1700031260
1700031261 [346]DiSalvo.“Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism”. 5
1700031262
1700031263 [347]试比较Oliver Marchart.“Art, Space and the Public Sphere(s): Some Basic Observations on the Difficult Relation of Public Art, Urbanism, and Political Theory”. European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0102/marchart/en,2010年2月5日访问。
1700031264
1700031265 [348]Giovanna Borasi.“City 2.0”. in Actions: What You Can Do with the City. 21
1700031266
1700031267 [349]Jacques Rancière. The Politics of Aesthetics.London: Continuum, 2004; Jacques Rancière. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2010
1700031268
1700031269 [350]Rancière. The Politics of Aesthetics. 12
1700031270
1700031271 [351]Steven Corcoran.“Introduction”. In: Jacques Rancière. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. 2
1700031272
1700031273 [352]Steven Corcoran.“Introduction”. In: Jacques Rancière. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. 2
1700031274
1700031275 [353]Nigel Thrift. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge, 2007. 52
1700031276
1700031277 [354]Rancière. The Politics of Aesthetics. 13
1700031278
1700031279 [355]参见http://www.appliedautonomy.com/isee.html,2011年2月10日访问。
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70003123e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]