1700075840
1700075841
10.Waitz 2：528.3d edition，2：1：213.
1700075842
1700075843
11.Binding, History of the Burgundian-Romanic Kingdom（Geschichte des burgundisch-romanischen Königreichs）1：196，Note 671.
1700075844
1700075845
12.Procopius 3.22.
1700075846
1700075847
13.Brunner, Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte 1：302，argues that the Romans were already referred to as subjects in the oldest existing version of the Lex Salica but still did not form any part of the army. This text is from the time of Clovis. Under Clovis’sons, however, in later texts and a supplement, note is taken of the fact that Romans can also be in the army.
1700075848
1700075849
14.Roth.Benefizialwesen, p.172，has assembled examples of military accomplishments by Gallo-Romans. But when he concludes from this that, contrary to the effeminate Italians, the Gallo-Romanic population can still be generally designated as warlike, that is concluding too much. Roth especially praises the Aquitanians. Why is this particular group supposed to have been especially brave? The preference for the one area shows us the error of the whole concept: these are no more than individual events preserved by chance, which have given a false picture. Quite similar things may have happened in Italy without, as a matter of chance, being described. The refining process of civilization and the inevitably accompanying softening had affected the population of Gaul in the course of four and a half centuries no less than it had the Italians.
1700075850
1700075851
15.Proven by Roth with numerous examples, p.173.
1700075852
1700075853
16.Roth, Beneflzialwesen, p.180.
1700075854
1700075855
17.Gregory 4.47 and elsewhere. Waitz 2：533.
1700075856
1700075857
18.The Burgundians, too, already had other than free men as warriors. The Lex Gundobada, Title X, reads: “Si quis servum natione barbarum occiderit lectum ministerialem sive expeditionalem, sexagenos solidos inferat, multae autem nomine XII.
1700075858
1700075859
Si alium serum Romanum sive barbarum aratorem aut porcarium XXX sol. solvat.”
1700075860
1700075861
（“If anyone should have killed a barbarian slave selected for service at court or for military service, he would pay 60 solidi, and 12，moreover, as a fine.）
1700075862
1700075863
（“If anyone should have killed another slave, Roman or barbarian, farmer or swine-herd, he would pay 30 solidi.”）
1700075864
1700075865
In this case, then, we have the barbarian military serving man（Kriegsknecht）；the common servant（Knecht）can also be a Roman, but this is not possible for the military serving man.
1700075866
1700075867
2 战术变化
1700075868
1700075869
1.Aurel.Victor.，Chapter 21.
1700075870
1700075871
2.Ars veterinaria 6.（4.）6. The horses of the Thuringians were also praised by Jordanes 1.3.21.
1700075872
1700075873
3.De bell.Vand.1.8.
1700075874
1700075875
4.Procopius, de bell. Vand.2.14.
1700075876
1700075877
5.Schmidt, Geschichte der Vandalen, p.39.
1700075878
1700075879
6.Procopius, bell. Goth.1.16；1.28；1.29.bell. Pers.2.18.
1700075880
1700075881
7.Brunner, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung（1887）：6.
1700075882
1700075883
8.For example，3.28；4.30；8.45；9.31.
1700075884
1700075885
9.Procopius 2.25. Agathias 2.5. Whether Procopius’statement here is entirely reliable must be considered doubtful, since he completely denies that the Franks used both the spear and the bow, weapons which many other sources indicate they had. Waitz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte 2：528；2d edition，2：213. If Procopius’report is at all correct, there may have been some unusual circumstance or other, as in 552，when the invaders were principally Alamanni, whom we elsewhere find to be specifically famous as cavalry.
1700075886
1700075887
10.Jähns, Geschichte der Kriegswissenschaften 1：142.
1700075888
1700075889
11.Oeuvres 28：163.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70007584e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]