1700168382
Templeton, Alan R.1998.Human races: a genetics and evolutionary perspective.American Anthropologist 100（3）：632-50.
1700168383
1700168384
Thoreau, Henry D.1897.Walden.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
1700168385
1700168386
Trautmann, Thomas R.1987.Lewis Henry Morgan and the invention of kinship.Berkeley: University of California Press.
1700168387
1700168388
Turner, Terence.1991.We are parrots, twins are birds: play of tropes as operational structure.In Beyond metaphor: the theory of tropes in anthropology.James W.Fernandez（ed.），pp.121-58.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
1700168389
1700168390
Turner, Victor.1967.The forest of symbols: aspects of Ndembu ritual.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
1700168391
1700168392
Tylor, Edward B.1871.Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom.London: John Murray.
1700168393
1700168394
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo.1992.From the enemy’s point of view: humanity and divinity in an Amazonian society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1700168395
1700168396
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo.1998.Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4（3）：469-88.
1700168397
1700168398
Wagner, Roy.1975.The invention of culture.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1700168399
1700168400
Weiner, Annette.1992.Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving.Berkeley: University of California Press.
1700168401
1700168402
Wengrow, David.2010.What makes civilization?: the ancient Near East and the future of the West.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1700168403
1700168404
Weston, Kath.2013.Lifeblood, liquidity, and cash transfusions: beyond metaphor in the cultural study of finance.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19（S）: S24-S41.
1700168405
1700168406
White, Leslie.2007[1959].The evolution of culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome.California: Left Coast Press.
1700168407
1700168408
Whorf, Benjamin Lee.1956.The relation of habitual thought and behaviour to language.In Language, thought and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf.John B.Carroll（ed.），pp.134-59.London: MIT Press.
1700168409
1700168410
Wilk, Richard R.2002.Television, time and the national imaginary in Belize.In Media worlds: anthropology on new terrain.Faye D.Ginsburg, Lila Abu-Lughod and Brian Larkin（eds），pp.171-86.Berkeley: University of California Press Willerslev, Rane.2009.The optimal sacrifice: a study of voluntary death among the Siberian Chukchi.American Ethnologist 36（4）：693-704.
1700168411
1700168412
Woodburn, James.1982.Egalitarian societies.Man 17（3）：431-51.
1700168413
1700168414
Woolard, Kathryn A.2016.Singular and plural: ideologies of linguistic authority in 21st century Catalonia.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1700168415
1700168416
Yan, Yunxiang.2009.The individualization of Chinese society.London: Bloomsbury.
1700168417
1700168418
Yudell, Michael, Dorothy Roberts, Rob DeSalle and Sarah Tishkoff.2016.
1700168419
1700168420
Taking race out of human genetics: engaging a century-long debate about the role of race in science.Science 351（6273）：564-5.
1700168421
1700168422
Zaloom, Caitlin.2006.Out of the pits: traders and technology from Chicago to London.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1700168423
1700168424
1700168425
1700168426
1700168427
如何像人类学家一样思考 [1]除非他们自己就是“本地人”。日本人类学家大贯惠美子（Emiko Ohnuki Tierney）就是一个例子（1984）。她在神户研究“她的族群”。然而本土人类学家是一类有争议的群体，引发了许多讨论。通常在非白人或是非西方的情境下，一个研究者才会被认为是“本土”的。所以如果你是日本人，研究日本，那么你就是本土人类学家。但如果你是白种美国人，研究例如好莱坞，那么你很可能不会被称为“本土人类学家”。这些争论让我们注意到人类学的殖民主义史里一些重要的信息。总的来说，反对“本土化”的主要论点是，一位人类学家不能仅仅站在研究对象的视角去描述世界。做人类学，始终应该留有某种批判的距离。
1700168428
1700168429
[2]如同在其他学术和职业领域中一样，人类学领域的女性，特别是早些年，也经常会遇到“玻璃天花板”。米德和本尼迪克特都没有得到顶尖大学的教职，尽管她们有着卓越的成就和名望。
1700168430
1700168431
[3]原文“cricket”既有板球也有蟋蟀的意思，显然作者一开始误解了菲利普的意思。——译者注
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.700168382e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]