1701502833
(178) 见Tilmann Habermas, Michaela Meier, and Barbara Mukhtar, “Are Specific Emotions Narrated Differently?”, Emotion , 9/6 (2009), 751—762; Tilmann Habermas and Verena Diel, “The Emotional Impact of Loss Naratives: Event Severity and Narrative Perspectives”, Emotion , 10/10 (2010), 312—323; Tilmann Habermas and Nadine Berger, “Retelling Everyday Emotional Events
:Condensation, Distancing, and Closure”, Cognition and Emotion , 25/2 (2011), 206—219。
1701502834
1701502835
(179) Maggie Schauer, Frank Neuner, and Thomas Elbert, Narrative Exposure Therapy: A Short-Term Treatment for Traumatic Stress Disorders (2nd rev. and enl. edn., Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe, 2011), 32.
1701502836
1701502837
(180) Maggie Schauer, Frank Neuner, and Thomas Elbert, Narrative Exposure Therapy: A Short-Term Treatment for Traumatic Stress Disorders (2nd rev. and enl. edn., Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe, 2011), 33.
1701502838
1701502839
(181) Gendron and Barrett, “Reconstructing the Past”, 335.
1701502840
1701502841
(182) Pascal Eitler, “Der ‘Neue Mann’ des ‘New Age’: Emotion und Religion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1970—1990”, in Manuel Borutta and Nina Verheyen (eds.), Die Präsenz der Gefühle
:Männlichkeit und Emotion in der Moderne (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2010), 279—304．也见Sabine Maasen,Jens Elberfeld, Pascal Eitler, and Maik Tändler (eds.), Das beratene Selbst: Zur Genealogie der Therapeutisierung in den “langen’ Siebzigern (Bielefeld: transcript, 2011)。
1701502842
1701502843
(183) Susanne Schregel, “Konjunktur der Angst: ‘Politik der Subjektivität’ und ‘neue Friedensbewegung’, 1979—1983”, in Bernd Greiner, Christian Th. Müller, and Dierk Walter(eds.), Angst im Kalten Krieg (Hamburg: Hamburger Edition, 2009), 495—520; Jörg Arnold,“‘Kassel 1943 mahnt …’: Zur Genealogie der Angst im Kalten Krieg”, in Greiner, Müller, and Walter (eds.), Angst im Kalten Krieg , 465—494.
1701502844
1701502845
(184) Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer, “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State”, Psychological Review , 69/5 (1962), 379—399, here 381—382.
1701502846
1701502847
(185) According to the psychologist Rainer Reisenzein, “Schachter—Singer Theory”, in David Sander and Klaus R. Scherer (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 352—353, here 352.
1701502848
1701502849
(186) 沙赫特将他的模型称为“改良的詹姆斯主义”，见Stanley Schachter, “The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotion State”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1 (1964), 49—80, here 70；沙赫特作为认知心理学的代表，见Ruth Leys, “The Turn to Affect: A Critique”, Critical Inquiry , 37/3 (2011), 434—472, here 469。
1701502850
1701502851
(187) Reisenzein, “Schachter—Singer Theory”, 353.
1701502852
1701502853
(188) Magda B. Arnold and John A. Gasson, “Feelings and Emotions as Dynamic Factors in Personality Integration”，in Arnold and John A. Gasson (eds.), The Human Person: An Approach to an Integral Theory of Personality (New York: Ronald Press, 1954), 294—313, here 294.
1701502854
1701502855
(189) Magda B. Arnold, Emotion and Personality , i. Psychological Aspects (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), 171.
1701502856
1701502857
(190) Arnold, Emotion and Personality , i. 179．也见Randolph R. Cornelius, The Science of Emotion
:Research and Tradition in the Psychology of Emotion (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996), 119。
1701502858
1701502859
(191) Cornelius, Science of Emotion , 114.
1701502860
1701502861
(192) 也见William M. Reddy, The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)。
1701502862
1701502863
(193) Arnold, Emotion and Personality , i. 175.
1701502864
1701502865
(194) 扎荣茨认为：“当代认知心理学直接忽视了情感”，只有社会心理学对情感给予了适当的关注，见R. B. Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences”, American Psychologist , 35/2 (1980), 151—175, here 152, n. 3。
1701502866
1701502867
(195) R. B. Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences”, American Psychologist , 35/2 (1980), 151.
1701502868
1701502869
(196) R. B. Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences”, American Psychologist , 35/2 (1980), 152.
1701502870
1701502871
(197) R. B. Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences”, American Psychologist , 35/2 (1980), 169.
1701502872
1701502873
(198) Zajonc, “Feeling and Thinking”, 172.
1701502874
1701502875
(199) Richard S. Lazarus, “Thoughts on the Relations between Emotion and Cognition”,American Psychologist , 37/9 (1982), 1019—1024, here 1020.
1701502876
1701502877
(200) Richard S. Lazarus, “Thoughts on the Relations between Emotion and Cognition”,American Psychologist , 37/9 (1982), 1019.
1701502878
1701502879
(201) 关于“新颅相学”，见William R. Uttal, The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001)；关于“大脑色情”和“神经泡沫”，见Christopher F. Chabris and Daniel J. Simons, The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways our Intuitions Deceive Us (New York: Crown, 2009), 139—143;关于“斑点学”，见Cordelia Fine, Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference (New York: Norton, 2010), 153。对fMRI扫描及其（生物）政治含义的批判，见Joseph Dumit, Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); Kelly A. Joyce, Magnetic Appeal: MRI and the Myth of Transparency (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008)。
1701502880
1701502881
(202) 目前，这些数学模型中最流行的是由卡尔· 弗里斯顿（Karl Friston）等人开发的动态因果模型（Dynamic Causal Modelling，简称DCM），见K. J. Friston, L. Harrison,and W. Penny, “Dynamic Causal Modelling”, NeuroImage , 19/4 (2003), 1273—1302。
1701502882
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.701502833e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]