1701503683
1701503684
(68) Scheer, “Are Emotions a Kind of Practice?”, 220，作者强调。
1701503685
1701503686
(69) 20世纪70年代末，雷迪跟随杰罗姆· 凯根从事了为期一年的发展心理学博士后研究，并积累了20多年的生命科学知识。关于雷迪师从凯根的经历，见Reddy,Navigation of Feeling , xiv; Plamper, “History of Emotions”, 237。此外，在1975—1976年期间，雷迪应克利福德· 格尔茨的邀请，与艾伦和威廉· 休厄尔（William Sewell）以及人类学家米歇尔和罗纳多· 罗萨尔多一起在普林斯顿高等研究院工作。如果雷迪的作品包含了神经科学研究的成果，那么这些材料比勒杜和达马西奥等普及工作者的作品更有依据，同时也证明了他在这一主题上的广泛涉猎，见William M. Reddy, “Saying Something New: Practice Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience”, Arcadia: International Journal for Literary Studies , 44/1 (2009), 8—23。
1701503687
1701503688
(70) Edmund P. Russell, “Neurohistory”, Rachel Carson Center at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München accessed 17 March 2014; Edmund Russell, Evolutionary History: Uniting History and Biology to Understand Life on Earth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)．德语中最著名的例子更多处理的是集体记忆，而不是情感，见Johannes Fried，Der Schleier der Erinnerung: Grundzüge einer historischen Memorik (Munich: Beck, 2004); Niels Birbaumer and Dieter Langewiesche, “Neuropsychologie und Historie—Versuch einer empirischen Annäherung: Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung (PTSD) und Soziopathie in Österreich nach 1945”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft , 32/2 (2006), 153—175。
1701503689
1701503690
(71) Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain (Berkeley and Los Angeles
:University of California Press, 2008), 4．又见Andrew Shryrock and Daniel Lord Smail (eds.),Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2011)。
1701503691
1701503692
(72) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 48.
1701503693
1701503694
(73) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 8.
1701503695
1701503696
(74) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 48—49.
1701503697
1701503698
(75) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 49.
1701503699
1701503700
(76) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 72.
1701503701
1701503702
(77) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 80.
1701503703
1701503704
(78) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 159.
1701503705
1701503706
(79) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 113, 150—151.
1701503707
1701503708
(80) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 113.
1701503709
1701503710
(81) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 114.
1701503711
1701503712
(82) 斯梅尔对先天与后天二分法的反对，见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 118。
1701503713
1701503714
(83) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 139—140.
1701503715
1701503716
(84) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 117.
1701503717
1701503718
(85) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 115.
1701503719
1701503720
(86) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 161.
1701503721
1701503722
(87) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 127.
1701503723
1701503724
(88) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 155.
1701503725
1701503726
(89) “除此之外，我们对每天刺激我们情绪和感情的机制变得麻木，这种神经化学的不敏感性可能有助于解释为什么这十年的兴奋点再过十年可能会变得无聊。”见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 188。
1701503727
1701503728
(90) 斯梅尔写道：“像海洛因和可卡因这样的毒品之所以会吸引一些人，是因为它们模仿了大脑中5-羟色胺和多巴胺的作用，可以人为地改变身体状态。”见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 151。
1701503729
1701503730
(91) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 137.
1701503731
1701503732
(92) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 118, 128, 155, 161, 175, 180, 182.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.701503683e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]