打字猴:1.70156289e+09
1701562890 9.Hartline: H. K. Hartline, H. G. Wagner, and F. Ratliff (1956). “Inhibition in the Eye of Limulus.”The Journal of General Physiology39(5): 651–673.
1701562891
1701562892 10.Barlow: R. B. Barlow, L. C. Ireland, and L. Kass (1982). “Vision Has a Role inLimulusMating Behavior.”Nature296(5852): 65–66.
1701562893
1701562894 11.Danny DeVito yearbook photo: i.imgur.com/njXUFGa.jpg.
1701562895
1701562896 12.Face perception: D. Maurer, R. L. Grand, and C. J. Mondloch (2002). “The Many Faces of Configural Processing.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6(6): 255–260.
1701562897
1701562898 13.Humans can detect: N. D. Haig (1984). “The Effect of Feature Displacement on Face Recognition.”Perception13(5): 505–512.
1701562899
1701562900 第三章 我们如何思考
1701562901
1701562902 1.Pavlov’s bell: There’s been some dispute about whether he actually used a bell, a dispute that seems to have been resolved in his favor by R. Thomas (1994). “Pavlov’s Dogs ‘Dripped Saliva at the Sound of a Bell.’ ”Psycoloquy5(80).
1701562903
1701562904 2.one of Garcia’s studies: J. Garcia and R. A. Koelling (1966). “Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning.”Psychonomic Science4(1): 123–124.
1701562905
1701562906 3.Modus ponensand causal considerations: D. D. Cummins, T. Lubart, O. Alksnis, and R. Rist (1991). “Conditional Reasoning and Causation.”Memory & Cognition19(3): 274–282.
1701562907
1701562908 4.We excel at casual analysis: An introduction to this literature can be found in B. F. Malle and J. Korman (2013). “Attribution Theory.” In ed. D. S. Dunn,Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
1701562909
1701562910 5.Reasoning backward: See, for example, A. Tversky and D. Kahneman (1978). “Causal Schemata in Judgments Under Uncertainty.”Progress in Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1701562911
1701562912 6.error in predictive reasoning: P. M. Fernbach, A. Darlow, and S. A. Sloman (2011). “Asymmetries in Predictive and Diagnostic Reasoning.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General140(2): 168–185; P. M. Fernbach, A. Darlow, and S. A. Sloman (2010). “Neglect of Alternative Causes in Predictive but Not Diagnostic Reasoning.”Psychological Science21(3): 329–336.
1701562913
1701562914 7.No evidence for diagnostic reasoning in animals: D. C. Penn, K. J. Holyoak, and D. J. Povinelli (2008). “Darwin’s Mistake: Explaining the Discontinuity Between Human and Nonhuman Minds.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences31(2): 109–130.
1701562915
1701562916 8.Crow study: A. H. Taylor, G. R. Hunt, F. S. Medina, and R. D. Gray (2009). “Do New Caledonian Crows Solve Physical Problems Through Causal Reasoning?”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences276(1655): 247–254.
1701562917
1701562918 9.Storytelling: See R. Hastie and N. Pennington (1995). “The Big Picture: Is It a Story?” inKnowledge and Memory: The Real Story. Ed. R. S. Wyer Jr. and J. K. Srull. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 133–138.
1701562919
1701562920 10.Heider and Simmel video: You can see the film on Youtube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=76p64j3H1Ng.
1701562921
1701562922 11.identities as stories: A major proponent of this view is Jerome Bruner.
1701562923
1701562924 第四章 我们的认知为何会出错
1701562925
1701562926 1.naive understanding of physics: M. McCloskey (1983). “Intuitive Physics.”Scientific American248(4): 122–130.
1701562927
1701562928 2.Andrea diSessa: A. A. diSessa (1983). “Phenomenology and the Evolution of Intuition.” In ed. D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens.Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1701562929
1701562930 3.People understand electricity:D. Gentner and D. R. Gentner (1983). “Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity.” InMental Models.
1701562931
1701562932 4.Quote from an experimental participant: W. Kempton (1986). “Two Theories of Home Heat Control.”Cognitive Science10: 75–90.
1701562933
1701562934 5.Thinking, Fast and Slow: D. Kahneman (2011).Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus.
1701562935
1701562936 6.associative versus rule-based thinking: S. A. Sloman (1996). “The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.”Psychological Bulletin119(1): 3–22.
1701562937
1701562938 7.System 1 versus System 2: K. E. Stanovich and R. F. West (2000). “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences23(5): 645–726.
1701562939
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70156289e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]