1702822904
1702822905
[310] Robert F. Nagel,“Invisible Teachers: A Comment on Perceptions in the Classroom.”Journal of Legal Education,Vol.32,p.359,1982.
1702822906
1702822907
[311] Alan Stone, “Legal Education on the Couch,” Harvard Law Review 85(1971): 412-413.
1702822908
1702822909
[312] Scott Turrow, One L (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Inc.), 1977.
1702822910
1702822911
[313] Ronald M. Pipkin, “Legal Education: The Consumers’ Perspective,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1976, no.4 (1976): 1191.
1702822912
1702822913
[314] Robert Granfield, Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond (New York: Routledge, 1992), p.131.
1702822914
1702822915
[315] Wibert E. Moore, The professions: Roles and Rules (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970), pp.76-79.
1702822916
1702822917
[316] Lawrence Dieker, Jr., Letters from Law School: The Life of a Second-Year Law Student (Lincoln, NE: Writers Club,2000), pp.239-240.
1702822918
1702822919
[317] Robert Ebert Byrnes and Jaime Marquart, Brush with the Law: The True Story of Law School Today at Harvard and Stanford, Los Angeles: Renaissance Books, 2001.
1702822920
1702822921
[318] Elizabeth Mertz, with Wamucii Njogu and Susan Gooding,“ What Difference Does Difference Make? The Challenge for Legal Education,” in Journal of Legal Education (Vol.48, No.1, 1998, pp.1-87).
1702822922
1702822923
[319] Duncan Kennedy, Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System (Cambridge, Mass.: Afar, 1983).
1702822924
1702822925
[320] Ralph Nader,“ Law Schools and Law Firms,” New Republic (October 11, 1969): p.21.
1702822926
1702822927
[321] David N. Rockwell, “The Education of the Capitalist Lawyer: The Law School,” in Robert Lefcourt, ed., Law Against the People (New York
:Vintage Books, 1971), p.97.
1702822928
1702822929
[322] Richard D. Kahlenberg, Broken Contract: A Memoir of Harvard Law School (New York: Hill and Wang, 1992), pp.153-154.
1702822930
1702822931
[323] Allan Gaim and Associates, The Reign of ETS (Washington, D.C.: The Ralph Nader Report on the Educational Testing Service, 1980), pp.222-223.
1702822932
1702822933
[324] Charles L Cappell and Ronald M Pipkin,“ The Inside Tracks: Status Distinctions in Allocations to Elite Law Schools,” in Paul William Kingston and Lionel S. Lewis, eds., The High-Status Track: Studies of Elite Schools and Stratification (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), pp.211-230.
1702822934
1702822935
[325] Frances Kahn Zemans and Victor G. Rosenblum, The Making of a Public Profession (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1981).
1702822936
1702822937
[326] Patricia J. Williams,“ Crimes Without Passion,” The Alchemy of Race and Rights
:Diary of a Law Professor, pp.80-92, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
1702822938
1702822939
[327] Timothy Hilton, “Lawyers at Play” (New Statesman, Jan.26, 1968, 117)in James Boyd White, The Legal Imagination (1973).
1702822940
1702822941
1702822942
1702822943
1702822945
法律之门（第八版） 第十三章 律师与对抗制过程
1702822946
1702822947
从我离家到返回，我花的每一分钱，即使是买份报纸，都入到我的委托人账上。我给檫鞋人的两毛五，或者喝酒用去的一美元，都不是我自己掏腰包。如果有人觉得这很了不起，我愿意指出一个事实：我做的每个动作，说的每个字，有的每个思想，也都不是我自己的。它们属于别人。
1702822948
1702822949
——查尔斯·雷克（Charles Reich）：《博利纳斯暗礁的巫师》
1702822950
1702822951
（The Sorcerer of Bolinas Reef），1976年
1702822952
1702822953
律师不是野蛮人，他们基本上是体面的、有爱心的、受过良好教育的公民。如果问题涉及人的残忍和野蛮，则律师的道德义愤感油然而生。他们会最先提出矫治方案，旨在抗制人的低级本能……然而，换一个焦点，如果问他们有关诉讼或审判的事，则他们的道德义愤感只及于当前对手的卑劣程度。他们通常以马基雅维里式的玩世不恭来对待问题。
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.702822904e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]