1703357360
1703357361
[26]有关资料及讨论可见Michael W. Doyle,“Kant,Liberal Legacies,and Foreign Affairs”,Philosophy and Public Affairs 12,Issue 3(1983),pp.205-235;Issue 4,pp.323-353。亦可见Charles R.Beitz,Political Theory and International Relations(Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press,1979); Spencer Weart,Never at War
:Why Democracies Wi l Not Fight One Another(New Haven
:Yale University Press,1998)。
1703357362
1703357363
[27]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 104.
1703357364
1703357365
[28]Ibid.
1703357366
1703357367
[29]Ibid.,p. 105.
1703357368
1703357369
[30]按康德的说法，国际法是规范国与国之间的法律；世界法则是视人人为一人类普遍性国家（a universal state of mankind）公民的法律，适用于所有人类。Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,pp. 98-99.
1703357370
1703357371
[31]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,pp. 105-107；亦可见“☆e Metaphysics of Morals”,pp.172-173。
1703357372
1703357373
[32]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 104.
1703357374
1703357375
[33]Kant,“☆e Metaphysics of Morals”,p. 171.
1703357376
1703357377
[34]Kant,“☆eory and Practice”,p. 90.
1703357378
1703357379
[35]Ibid.
1703357380
1703357381
[36]Ibid.,p. 92.
1703357382
1703357383
[37]Ibid.
1703357384
1703357385
[38]Kant “,Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 105．粗体为原文所加。亦可参考Mary J. Gregor的译本，她将international state译为state of nations。康德所指的nation，应是peoples之意。
1703357386
1703357387
[39]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,pp. 113-114．亦可参见“☆e Metaphysics of Morals”,p. 171。
1703357388
1703357389
[40]Jean Bodin,On Sovereignty
:Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth,ed. Julian H. Franklin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1992).
1703357390
1703357391
[41]康德也接受了博丹对这三种政治制度的区分。见Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p.100。
1703357392
1703357393
[42]对于主权概念的历史起源及发展更详细的讨论，可参陈弘毅：《主权和人权的历史和法理学反思》,《二十一世纪》，第55期（1999），页18—29。
1703357394
1703357395
[43]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 94．韦伯对国家的看法，可见Weber,“Politics as a Vocation”,in From Max Weber
:Essays in Sociology,ed.H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (London: Routledge,1948),p. 78。
1703357396
1703357397
[44]Kant,“☆e Metaphysics of Morals”,pp. 137-138．亦可见“☆eory and Practice”,p. 73。
1703357398
1703357399
[45]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 94．如前面所言，康德并没有要求原初契约必须在历史上发生过，它只是假然性的契约，但却是任何政权合法性（legitimacy）的必要条件。Kant,“☆eory and Practice”,p. 79。
1703357400
1703357401
[46]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,pp. 94,96（亦即六项预备性条款中的第二及第五项）。
1703357402
1703357403
[47]Kant,“Toward Perpetual Peace”,p. 118.
1703357404
1703357405
[48]Ibid.,p. 104.
1703357406
1703357407
[49]Jürgen Habermas,“Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace,with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’Hindsight”,in Perpetual Peace,ed.Bohman and Lutz-Bachmann,p. 128.
1703357408
1703357409
[50]G. W. F. Hegel,Philosophy of Right,trans.T. M. Knox (Oxford: Oxford University Press,1952),pp. 213-214.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70335736e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]