打字猴:1.70463224e+09
1704632240 如果政府采取违背比较优势的战略,发展中国家具有比较优势的劳动密集型行业就会受到抑制。因此,一个转轨国家在从社会主义经济向市场经济转轨的过程中,其经济增长状况就决定于该国是否有能力为劳动密集型行业的发展创造一个合适的环境,同时为从以前的发展战略中继承下来的企业找到解决其自生能力问题的办法,为消除以前的各种扭曲和政府干预铺平道路。然而,在那些采取违背比较优势战略的许多国家中,存在着许多不具有自生能力的企业,它们在开放的竞争性市场中是无力生存的。如果政府扭曲和干预被突然取消,这些企业就会破产。同时,以前被抑制的劳动密集型产业会快速发展,这些产业中新创造的就业机会将超过不具有自生能力的企业破产所带来的就业损失。其结果是,在实施休克疗法后不久,经济就会充满活力地增长,其代价最多不过是开始时产出和就业的很小损失。
1704632241
1704632242 另一方面,如果不具有自生能力的企业数量过大,这些企业的产出和就业在国民经济中占的比例就会太大,从而休克疗法将不适用。休克疗法将导致大规模的企业破产和失业的急剧增加,从而造成经济混乱。为了避免失业的急剧增加,或者为了维持这些不具有自生能力的“先进”企业,有些政府(比如一些东欧国家的政府)就继续对这些企业采取或明或暗的保护和补贴。这种办法的最终结果是,这些经济陷入了只有休克没有疗效的悲惨境地(Kolodko,2000)。[19]
1704632243
1704632244 中国政府采取了双轨制,这被认为优于休克疗法(McKinnon,1993)。跟华盛顿共识倡导的“宏观制度优先”思路不同,中国政府采取了“微观优先”的办法,以提高农民和国有企业工人的积极性。在农村,政府采取了以家庭为单位的耕作体系,取代了集体耕作体系[20];在国有企业中,采取了利润留成和扩大企业经营自主权的措施[21]。这些措施使得农民和工人对经营剩余具有了部分获取权。这些改革大大提高了农业和工业的积极性和生产率(Groves et al.,1994;Jefferson,Rawski and Zheng,1992;Jefferson and Rawski,1995;Lin,1992;Li,1997;Weitzman and Xu,1995)。然后,中国政府允许集体的乡镇企业[22]、私有企业、合资企业以及国有企业用它们的资源投资于以前被抑制的劳动密集型行业。同时,要求农民和国有企业履行义务,按照预定价格把其一定数量的产品卖给政府。前一措施改善了资源配置的效率,后一措施确保了政府有能力继续补贴那些不具有自生能力的企业。就这样,中国政府同时实现了经济稳定和充满活力的经济增长。
1704632245
1704632246 参考文献
1704632247
1704632248 Acemoglu,Daron,and Fabrizio Zilibotti.1999.“Productivity Differences.” Working Paper 6879 National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge,Mass.
1704632249
1704632250 Ahluwalia,Montek S.1976.“Inequality,Poverty,and Development.” Journal of Development Economics 3 (December):307—312.
1704632251
1704632252 Akamatsu,K.1962.“A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” Developing Economies,preliminary issue,no.1 (March-August):3—25.
1704632253
1704632254 Atkinson,Anthony B.,and Joseph E.Stiglitz.1969.“A New View of Technological Change.” Economic Journal 79 (September):573—578.
1704632255
1704632256 Barro,Robert J.1997.Determinants of Economic Growth:A Cross-Country Empirical Study.Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press.
1704632257
1704632258 Barro,Robert J.,and Xavier Sala-i-Martin.1992.“Convergence.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (April):223—251.
1704632259
1704632260 ——.1997.“Technological Diffusion,Convergence,and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 2 (March):1—26.
1704632261
1704632262 Basu,Susanto,and David N.Weil.1998.“Appropriate Technology and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (November):1025—1054.
1704632263
1704632264 Baumol,William J.1986.“Productivity Growth,Convergence,and Welfare:What the Long-Run Data Show.” American Economic Review 76 (December):1072—1085.
1704632265
1704632266 Ben-David,Dan.1993.“Equalizing Exchange:Trade Liberalization and Income Convergence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (August):653—679.
1704632267
1704632268 Caselli,Francesco.1999.“Technological Revolutions,” American Economic Review 89 (March):78—102.
1704632269
1704632270 Caselli,Francesco,and Wilbur John Coleman II.2000.“The World Technology Frontier.” Working Paper 7904.National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge,Mass.
1704632271
1704632272 Caselli,Francesco,Gerardo Esquivel,and Fernando Lefort.1996.“Reopening the Convergence Debate:A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics.” Journal of Economic Growth 1 (September):363—389.
1704632273
1704632274 Chenery,Hollis B.1961.“Comparative Advantage and Development Policy.” American Economic Review 51 (March):18—51.
1704632275
1704632276 Chenery,Hollis B.,and M.Syrquin.1975.Pattern of Development,1950—70.New York:Oxford University Press.
1704632277
1704632278 Cline,William.1975.“Distribution and Development:A Survey of the Literature.” Journal of Development Economics 1 (February):359—400.
1704632279
1704632280 Diwan,I.,and D.Rodrik.1991.“Patents,Appropriate Technology,and North-South Trade.” Journal of International Economics 30:27—47.
1704632281
1704632282 Dollar,David.1992.“Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly:Evidence from 95 LDCs,1976—1985.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 40,no.3 (April):523—544.
1704632283
1704632284 Edwards,Sebastian.1995.Crisis and Reform in Latin America:From Despair to Hope.New York:Oxford University Press.
1704632285
1704632286 Fei,John,Gustav Ranis,and Shirley W.Y.Kuo.1979.Growth with Equity:The Taiwan Case,New York:Oxford University Press.
1704632287
1704632288 Fields,Gary.1991.“Growth and Income Distribution.” In Essays on Poverty,Equity,and Growth,ed.George Psacharopoulus.Oxford:Pergamon,pp.1—52.
1704632289
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70463224e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]