打字猴:1.70513363e+09
1705133630 Notes
1705133631
1705133632 1Gaokao is pinyin for College Entrance Examination in China.
1705133633
1705133634 2 See for instance, Hill, Bill and Richard W. Leeman. The Art and Practice of Argumentation and Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities, 1996.; Johannesen, Richard L. Ethics in Human Communication. 4th ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, Inc., 1996. ; Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: the University of California Press, 1988. ; Stafford, Charles, ed. Ordinary Ethics in China. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
1705133635
1705133636 3 For an example of an early utilitarian thinker, see Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Clarendon Press, 1789.
1705133637
1705133638 4 See for instance, Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
1705133639
1705133640 5 Of course, the counter argument is that by enhancing one’s own educational and employment prospects, one is diminishing these same prospects of other students who do not cheat.
1705133641
1705133642 6 Zigelmueller and Kay also include a 5th stock issue of jurisdiction which has been omitted as is not relevant to WorldsStyle debate.
1705133643
1705133644
1705133645
1705133646
1705133647 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132345]
1705133648 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 Part TwoWorlds-Style Debate
1705133649
1705133650 Part Two presents a cursory description of the specific format used in Worlds-Style debate. To accomplish that interplay between reading the textbook information and performing debates, students should begin immediately to discuss the topics from the textbook with their debate colleagues while also participating in debate tournaments. Chapter 5 explains the format of Worlds-Style debate, providing information on such as how many debaters serve on a team, how many teams engage the debate, the order in which speakers present, how speeches are timed, and so on. Chapters 6 and 7 explain how to construct arguments, first for the First Government Team and then for the First Opposition Team. Chapters 8 and 9 cover Member Speeches and Whip Speeches. Even as students are completing Part Two, they may wish to attend tournaments where they will begin to apply the concepts they have studied.
1705133651
1705133652
1705133653
1705133654
1705133655 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132346]
1705133656 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 Chapter 5Worlds-Style Debate as a Model of Educational Debate
1705133657
1705133658 Robert Trapp and Yang Ge
1705133659
1705133660 Chapter Outline
1705133661
1705133662 5.1 Parliamentary Systems and Worlds-Style Debate
1705133663
1705133664 5.2 Worlds-Style Debate Format
1705133665
1705133666 5.3 Responsibilities for Speakers in Worlds-Style Debate
1705133667
1705133668 5.4 Summary
1705133669
1705133670 5.5 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 5
1705133671
1705133672 5.6 Discussion Questions for Chapter 5
1705133673
1705133674 5.7 Exercise for Chapter 5
1705133675
1705133676 思辨精英:英语辩论-构筑全球视角 [:1705132347]
1705133677 5.1 Parliamentary Systems and Worlds-Style Debate
1705133678
1705133679 Educational debate is usually modeled on some legislative system such as a congress or a parliament. In some cases, it is based on a legal model. The format of educational debate on which this book will focus is modeled on debate in parliamentary systems of government and is called Worlds-Style debate and sometimes, not surprisingly, British Parliamentary debate. This format is the most popular form of educational debate in the world. Beyond its popularity, it has been chosen as the format for this book for a variety of reasons. First, Worlds-Style debate is a lively and energetic format involving four teams of two people not only giving persuasive speeches, but also interacting with each other through questions and comments throughout the debate.1 Second, Worlds-Style debate is a format in which students can practice a variety of advocacy skills ranging from argument construction to refutation to organization to delivery. Third, because each Worlds-Style debate involves four two-person teams, eight people have the opportunity to actively participate in each debate. Eight participants stand in contrast to the two to four people who participate in other forms of debate. So, for educational and practical reasons, Worlds-Style debate provides an excellent format for educational debating and for that reason, is the focus of this book.
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70513363e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]