1705134090
First, the Deputy Prime Minister should refute arguments presented by the Leader of Opposition. Refutation is the topic of Chapter 10 and that process will be more fully discussed there. For now, it is sufficient to say that the Deputy Prime Minister should challenge the best of the arguments offered by the Leader of Opposition. Refutation is an important part of the speech, but the Deputy Prime Minister should not devote a majority of speech time to this process. Although the amount of time used in refutation of the Leader of Opposition’s argument will vary according to the situation, that process probably should not take more than one or two minutes. Debaters need to remember that devoting time to an opponent’s argument is a necessary feature of a good debate speech, and gives added credibility to that opponent’s argument, as well.
1705134091
1705134092
Second, the Deputy Prime Minister should support the arguments presented by the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister will have already presented one or two arguments in support of the motion as he or she interpreted it. Then, the Leader of Opposition will, in all likelihood, have refuted those arguments. The role now for the Deputy Prime Minister is to rebuild those original arguments. That process of rebuilding the Prime Minister’s arguments must include refutation of the Leader of Opposition’s arguments that were raised against them. So, the process might unfold something like this: the Deputy Prime Minister will very briefly review the Prime Minister’s argument then state the Leader of Opposition’s objections. Then, the Deputy will refute those arguments raised by the Leader of Opposition and, in so doing, will rebuild the Prime Minister’s argument. The Deputy Prime Minister needs to remember that the second step needs to be accomplished by following the outline of the Prime Minister, not the outline of the Leader of Opposition. By following the outline of the Prime Minister, the Deputy keeps the Prime Minister’s case in focus.
1705134093
1705134094
The process of supporting the arguments raised by the Prime Minister is an important one. Judges and audiences alike have the right to assume that the arguments raised by the Prime Minister are among the most important arguments the First Government Team will make. If those arguments are refuted by the Leader of Opposition and then not supported again, the arguments will lose a considerable amount of their credibility.
1705134095
1705134096
Finally, the Deputy Prime Minister should add at least one new argument to the debate—an argument that is different from yet supportive of the arguments presented by the Prime Minister. The purpose of the new argument is to demonstrate that the Deputy Prime Minister takes more than a supportive role in that debate—that he or she is able to construct independent arguments as well as refute and support previous arguments.
1705134097
1705134099
6.5 Summary
1705134100
1705134101
This chapter has focused on how the First Government Team creates arguments in support of their interpretation of the motion. Because of its importance in the overall debate, much of the focus has been on the speech of the Prime Minister. The chapter introduced the components of the First Government case, including defining and interpreting the motion, clarifying and specifying the position that the First Government will advocate and defend, and constructing a series of arguments to support the case.
1705134102
1705134103
The chapter then focused briefly on the role of the Deputy Prime Minister. That role includes refuting arguments offered by the Leader of Opposition, supporting arguments made by the Prime Minister, and constructing independent arguments to support the Prime Minister’s interpretation of the motion.
1705134104
1705134105
本章中,作者着重介绍了正方上院应该如何进行论证才能有效地支撑他们对于辩题的解读。鉴于首相在整场辩论中的重要地位,作者重点关注了首相的演讲,详细介绍了正方上院立论框架的组成,包括定义和解读辩题、表明正方上院的立场以及用一系列论证来充实本方立论框架、支持本方观点。
1705134106
1705134107
此外,本章节简要介绍了副首相的角色和职能,其中包括反驳反对党党魁提出的论点、拥护首相提出的论点,并提出新的论点支持其对辩题的解读等。
1705134108
1705134110
6.6 Terms and Concepts from Chapter 6
1705134111
1705134112
Check your memory and comprehension by describing or defining these key terms and concepts:
1705134113
1705134114
· First Government Team’s right to define and interpret the motion
1705134115
1705134116
· Reasonable person standard for definitions and interpretations
1705134117
1705134118
· Prime Minister’s responsibility to describe the Government Team’s position
1705134119
1705134120
· Model of the motion
1705134121
1705134122
· Three specifications common to a model
1705134123
1705134124
· Deputy Prime Minister’s obligations (refute, rebuild, construct)
1705134125
1705134126
· Describe, associate, evaluate pattern of argument construction
1705134127
1705134129
6.7 Discussion Questions for Chapter 6
1705134130
1705134131
· How does the Prime Minister’s obligation to provide a statement of advocacy for a value motion differ from the obligation to provide a model for a policy motion?
1705134132
1705134133
· Discuss the Prime Minister’s right to define and interpret the motion and the concomitant responsibility to do so in a reasonable fashion.
1705134134
1705134136
6.8 Exercises for Chapter 6
1705134137
1705134138
· Exercise 1:
1705134139
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70513409e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]