打字猴:1.705699569e+09
1705699569
1705699570 63. Diod. 17.110.3; Arrian 7.12.1-2; Plut. Alex. 71.5.
1705699571
1705699572 64. Badian, Stud. GRHist., p. 201.
1705699573
1705699574 65. Quoted by Arrian, 7.19.6; cf. Strabo 16.1.11, C. 741. 关于远至大西洋的征服计划,参见 Diod. 18.4.4, cf. Schachermeyr, MP, pp. 324 ff; Badian, Harv. Stud. 72 (1967), 184-9; Bosworth, CQ ns21 (1971), 127 and n. 5。
1705699575
1705699576 66. QC 10.10.4; Arrian 7.12.6, cf. Plut. Alex. 39.11, Livy 8.24.17, Bosworth, op. cit., p. 126. 至于奥林匹娅斯挑唆亚历山大除掉安提帕特,参见 Ps-Call. 3.31.1, Metz Epitome 87, cf. Diod. 17.118.1, Justin 12.14.1-3。
1705699577
1705699578 67. Arrian 7.12.3-7; QC 10.10.15; Plut. Phoc. 18.4-5, 29, Moral. 472E (cf. 780, 545A), 180E 17; Justin 12.12.8-9; Aelian VH 12.16 (关于亚历山大对安提帕特和其他人的才能的嫉妒——此处即指安提帕特的领导能力); Suda s.v. Antipatros⑤ .
1705699579
1705699580 68. cf. Bosworth, CQ ns21 (1971), 125-6.
1705699581
1705699582 69. 至于毒杀的假说,参见 Justin 12.14; Plut. Alex. 77.1-3; Arrian 7.27; QC 10.10.14-17。在这一假说的现代支持者中,最有说服力的是 Milns, pp. 255-8,参看 Hamilton, PA, pp. 213-14。现在亦可参见 Bosworth, op. cit., pp. 113-16。
1705699583
1705699584 70. Bosworth, op. cit., esp. pp. 134-6; cf. Diod. 18.23.2; QC 10.6.9, 16-18, 21 ff.
1705699585
1705699586 71. 至于安提帕特与雅典和埃托利亚的秘密谈判,参见 Plut. Alex. 49.8; Diod. 18.8.6-7; Justin 13.5.1-8; QC 10.2.2; cf. Badian, MP, pp. 223-7, with reff. there cited; Bosworth, op. cit., p. 127。
1705699587
1705699588 72. 对哈尔帕罗斯返回雅典以及后来发生之事最好的现代研究著作是 Badian, JHS 81 (1961), 131-6 = MP, pp. 221 ff。亦可参见 Berve, APG, II, no. 143, pp. 75 ff.。关于史料,参见 Plut. Dem. 25, Phoc. 21.3 [Vit. X Orat.] 846A-C, Moral. 531A, 845C; Diod. 17.108.7, 17.111.3; Paus. 2.33.3-4; Hypereides In Demosth. 3, cols. 8-13, 4(5) cols. 18-19, 7(8) col. 32, cf. fr. A13(有为哈尔帕罗斯辩护的演说辞,可能是伪造的);Deinarchus In Demosth. 68-71, 81-2, 89-90, 112-13, In Philocl. 1-2, cf. fr. B12(有拒绝将哈尔帕罗斯交给亚历山大的演说辞,可能是伪造的)。所有出自叙佩雷德斯和戴纳尔科斯(Deinarchus)的段落都可以方便地据此版本进行研究,即 J. O. Burtt, Minor Attic Orators, vol. II (Loeb, 1954)。关于萨摩斯事件,参见 Plut. Alex. 28, and J. R . Hamilton, CQ ns3 (1953), 151 ff., =MP, pp. 235 ff.。
1705699589
1705699590 73. Tod, II, nos. 201-2, pp. 289- 301, cf. Hamilton, op. cit., p. 152 f.; Badian ibid., p. 227; Wilcken, pp. 217-18.
1705699591
1705699592 74. Plut. Moral. 187E, 804B, 842D; Aelian VH 2.19.5-12, cf. Athen. 6.58; Diog. Laert. 6.8, 6.63; Val. Max. 7.2, ext. §13; Timaeus ap. Polyb. 12.12b.3; Hypereides In Demosth. 31; Deinarchus In Demosth. 94; cf. Badian, MP, pp. 223-4; Balsdon, op. cit., pp. 199-200.
1705699593
1705699594 75. Arrian 7.13-14 passim, 23.6-8; Diod. 17.110.7-8, 115-25 passim; Ephippus ap. Athen. 12.538a-b; Aelian VH 7.8; Lucian Cal. 17; Justin 12.12.11-12; Plut. Alex. 47, 72, Eum. 1, 2.4-5, Moral. 181D 29, 180D 14; cf. Berve, APG, II, no. 357, pp. 169 ff., and Hamilton, PA, p. 129 with reff.
1705699595
1705699596 76. Diod. 17.108.7-8, 18.19.2; Paus. 2.33.4; Hypereides In Demosth. col. 38 (cf. MAO II, pp. 167-8); [Vit . X Orat.] 846c. 菲罗斯特拉托斯(Philostratus, Vit. Soph. 538)认为,亚历山大亲自提供了证据,德摩斯提尼因此被定罪。至于德摩斯提尼与赫淮斯提翁的联系,参见 Marsyas of Pella, FGrH, nos. 135-6, fr. 2, cf. Aeschines 3.162, both cited by Hamilton, PA, p. 130。
1705699597
1705699598 77. Arrian 7.15.1-3; Diod. 17.111.4-6; Plut. Alex. 72.3; Strabo 11.13.6, C. 524, cf. 16.1.11 (该地区是优良的木材产地).
1705699599
1705699600 78. Arrian 7.15.4-7.17.6; Plut. Alex. 73; Strabo 16.1.5; C. 738; Diod. 17.112 passim; Justin 12.13.3-5; Appian BC 2.153.
1705699601
1705699602 79. 使节:Arrian 7.15.4-6, 7.19.1-2; Diod. 17.113.1-4; Justin 12.13.1-2; cf. M. Sordi, Rend. Inst. Lomb, 99 (1965), 435-52。入侵阿拉伯的计划:Arrian 7.19.3-20 passim; Strabo 16.1.11, C.741, 16.4.27, C. 785; Plin. HN 16.80.221, 12.42.86-7。亚历山大想要超越狄奥尼索斯的雄心:Plut. Moral. 326B.
1705699603
1705699604 80. 赫淮斯提翁的葬礼:Diod. 17.114-5 passim。其他事件:Arrian 7.21-2 passim; Diod 17.116.5-7; Strabo 9.2.18, C. 407; Appian Syr. 9.56, cf. Strabo 16.1.11, C.741; Eddy, pp. 108-9; Cary, GB, p. 179。
1705699605
1705699606 81. Arrian 7.18 passim, 7.23.1-24.3; Diod. 17.110.1-2, 116.1-4; Plut. Alex. 73.3-4, 75.1-2; Justin 12.13.3-5; Ps-Call. 3.30; cf. Eddy, ibid., Milns, p. 254, and (with reservations) P. J. Derchain and J. Hubaux, Ant. Cl. 19 (1950), 367 ff.
1705699607
1705699608 82. Bosworth, CQ ns21 (1971), 126-7, 134-6.
1705699609
1705699610 83. Arrian 7.23.2; Plut. Alex. 74 passim; cf. Badian, MP, pp. 226-7.
1705699611
1705699612 84. Arrian 7.23.5; Aelian VH 3.23; Plin. HN 14.5.58; Plut. Moral. 207D 8; cf. Brunt, GR, p. 213; and D. Kienast, Gymnasium 76 (1969), 430-56.
1705699613
1705699614 85. 至于亚历山大的最后时日,参见 A. E. Samuel, Historia 14 (1965), 8, citing A. J. Sachs, Late Babylonian Astronomical and Related Texts (Rhode Island, 1955), no. 209; Wells, Loeb Diodorus, vol. VIII, p. 467 n. 5, cf. Hamilton, PA, p. 210。至于当晚的事情,包括美狄奥斯的聚会,参见 Arrian 7.24.4-25.1; Plut. Alex. 75.3; Diod. 17.117.1-3; Ps-Call. 3.31.8; Athen. 10.434a-c, 12.537d. 所谓的“皇家实录”意在解释国王最后的生病和死亡(参看 Arrian 7.25-6, Plut. Alex. 76, Jacoby FGrH 117),该实录已经得到了许多讨论,而且直到最近一直被学者们过分使用:参见 C. A. Robinson, The Ephemerides of Alexander’s Expedition(Providence, 1932: 这是一个精巧而新奇的过程再现)。修正性的评价可参见 A. E. Samuel, ‘Alexander’s Royal journals’, Historia 14 (1965), 1-12; E. Badian, ‘A King’s Notebooks’, Harv. Stud. Class. Phil. 72 (1967) 183-204, and, most recently, A. B. Bosworth, CQ ns21 (1971), 117 ff.,博斯沃思把这份实录当作亚历山大谋杀者出于政治宣传而伪造的突出例子。
1705699615
1705699616 86. 至于此人的有关情况,参见 Berve, APG, II, no. 521, pp. 261-2。
1705699617
1705699618 87. 尤可参见 Arrian 7.27.2。唯一的同谋者名单(本质上并非不可信,不过可参见 Bosworth, op. cit., p. 116 and n. 3),是伪卡利斯特涅斯提供的(Ps-Call. 3.31.8):墨勒阿格、列昂那托斯、卡山德、佩乌凯斯塔斯、医师腓力和涅阿尔科斯。
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.705699569e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]