1701879791
新视野下的罗尔斯研究
1701879792
1701879793
今年12月,由意大利罗马国际社会科学自由大学和约翰·卡波特大学联合主办的为期三天的国际学术研讨会在罗马召开,吸引了来自欧美各地的三十多位著名学者参加。会议的主题是“在罗尔斯与宗教之间:后世俗时代的自由主义”。[19]这标志着罗尔斯“宗教文稿”出版之后在学术界引发的新的研究动向。[20]
1701879794
1701879795
理性与启示的关系是西方思想传统的核心问题之一,而在现代社会中,如何处理政治自由主义与宗教信仰之间的紧张也成为公共哲学的主题。约翰·罗尔斯是20世纪政治自由主义的主要思想家,但他是否恰当地处理了宗教经验在民主社会中的位置,是争议的焦点之一。罗尔斯生前很少谈论自己的宗教观点,但在他2002年去世后不久,普林斯顿大学的一位宗教学教授发现了罗尔斯在1942年写下的一篇关于基督教伦理的论文,题目是《对原罪与信仰之意义的简要探寻》。罗尔斯当时甚至计划在战后从事神学研究。在罗尔斯的遗稿中还发现了一篇从未公开的短文《关于我的宗教》。哈佛大学出版社在去年将两篇文章合起来出版。[21]约书亚·科恩和托马斯·内格尔在序言中指出,罗尔斯不同于许多对宗教漠视或知之甚少的自由主义者,他的自由主义理论强调宗教信仰的重要性。
1701879796
1701879797
罗尔斯在早期“宗教文稿”中体现出对社群的高度重视,对孤立的个人主义以及对传统契约论思想的严厉批判。这表明曾经指责他“忽视了人们根本的社会属性”的批评意见是多么轻率。新视角下的罗尔斯研究,关注宗教在民主社会中的位置、宗教教义与“公共理性”之间的关系,以及宗教与公共生活的界限等问题。这也是这次罗马国际会议的主要议题。
1701879798
1701879799
注释
1701879800
1701879801
[1] Raffi Khatchadourian, “No Secrets: Julian Assange’s Mission for Total Transparency,” New Yorker, June 7, 2010.
1701879802
1701879803
[2] 参见http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks。
1701879804
1701879805
[3] Noam Chomsky: WikiLeaks Cables Reveal “Profound Hatred for Democracy on the Part of Our Political Leadership,” Democracy Now!, November 30, 2010 (http://www.democracynow.org).
1701879806
1701879807
[4] “Noam Chomsky Backs Wikileaks Protests in Australia,” Green Left Weekly, December 10, 2010 (http://www.greenleft.org.au).
1701879808
1701879809
[5] Michael Moore, “Why I’m Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange,” December14, 2010.
1701879810
1701879811
[6] Umberto Eco,“Not such Wicked Leaks Libération,”December 2, 2010. 英文翻译参照http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/414871-not-such-wicked-leaks。
1701879812
1701879813
[7] Frank Furedi, “WikiLeaks: This Isn’t Journalism . It’s Voyeurism,” Spiked, November 30, 2010 (http://www.spiked-online.com).
1701879814
1701879815
[8] 参见http://www.tnr.com/topics/wikileaks。
1701879816
1701879817
[9] Todd Gitlin, “Everything Is Data, but Data Isn’t Everything,” December 7, 2010. (http://www.tnr.com).
1701879818
1701879819
[10] “Is WikiLeaks’Julian Assange a Hero? Glenn Greenwald Debates Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News,” Democracy Now! December 3, 2010 (http://www.democracynow.org).
1701879820
1701879821
[11] Edward Carr, “The Dangers of a Rising China,” The Economist, December 4, 2010, p. 13.
1701879822
1701879823
[12] Edward Carr, “Special Report: China’s Place in the World,” The Economist, December 4, 2010, p. 52.
1701879824
1701879825
[13] “Does Moral Action Depend on Reasoning? Thirteen Views on the Question,” Spring 2010(www.templeton.org/reason).
1701879826
1701879827
[14] “Symposium on Socialism,” Dissent, Summer 2010.
1701879828
1701879829
[15] Michael Kazin,“Introduction”; Sheri Berman,“What Happened to the European Left?”; Robin Blackburn,“Socialism and the Current Crisis”; Jack Clark,“What Would a Real Socialist President Do?”; Michael Walzer, “Which Socialism?”Dissent, Summer 2010, pp. 23-43.
1701879830
1701879831
[16] Ayaan Hirsi Ali, NOMAD: From Islam to America: A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations, Free Press, 2010.
1701879832
1701879833
[17] Nicholas D. Kristof, “The Gadfly,” New York Times, May 30, 2010, p. BR22.
1701879834
1701879835
[18] Susan Jacoby, “Multiculturalism and Its Discontents,” Big Questions Online, August 19, 2010(http://www.bigquestionsonline.com).
1701879836
1701879837
[19] 会议议程参见http://www.luiss.edu/dptssp/node/143/。
1701879838
1701879839
[20] 参见Kwame Anthony Appiah, “Religious Faith and John Rawls,” The New York Review of Books, Vol. 57,No. 19,December 9,2010,pp. 51-52。
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70187979e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]