1704380118
创新、工资与财富：为什么技术进步、财富增加，你的工资却止步不前 [
:1704378249]
1704380119
创新、工资与财富：为什么技术进步、财富增加，你的工资却止步不前 注释
1704380120
1704380121
序言
1704380122
1704380123
1.From 1979 to 2011, the hourly wage (Bureau of Labor Statistics usual weekly wage divided by average hours) adjusted for benefits (multiplying the wage by the ratio of total employee compensation to wage and salary accruals from the NIPA accounts of the Bureau of Economic Analysis) and for the cost of living (Consumer Price Index), grew only 0.2 percent per annum.Some economists contend that the CPI overstates inflation, in which case hourly wages would have risen by more.Also, note that because hours worked per household have increased, household income has not stagnated as much as the hourly wage.
1704380124
1704380125
2.Brynjolfsson and McAfee, Second Machine Age.
1704380126
1704380127
3.Clark, Farewell to films.
1704380128
1704380129
4.Piketty, Capital.
1704380130
1704380131
5.Cowen, Average Is Over.
1704380132
1704380133
6.Allen, “Engels’ Pause.”
1704380134
1704380135
7.Piketty, Capital.
1704380136
1704380137
8.I build on the work of other scholars who have pioneered the subject of technical knowledge.Three of the most important economic historians to do so are Nathan Rosenberg, Joel Mokyr, and Paul David.See David, Technical Choice; Mokyr, Gifts of Athena; Mokyr, Enlightened Economy; and Rosenberg, Black Box.Management literature studies the role of knowledge in the firm; see Foray, Economics of Knowledge.Learning by doing has been seen to play a role in the economic theory of growth; see Arrow, “Economic Implications,” and Jovanovic, “Learning and Growth.” David Warsh tells the story of knowledge in economic growth theory; see Warsh, Knowledge.
1704380138
1704380139
9.Some economists use the term “learning by doing” in a narrow sense to connote a very specific situation where a new plant will reduce its cost of production as its cumulative output grows.As I will discuss, this plant-level effect often involves workers and managers learning through experience, but it might involve other things as well.When I use the term “learning by doing,” I connote the much broader and original notion of the term, which includes “learning by using” (Rosenberg) and a significant swath of “user innovation” (von Hippel).
1704380140
1704380141
第一章 创新？之后才更重要！
1704380142
1704380143
1.Larcom, New England Girlhood.
1704380144
1704380145
2.Appleton, Introduction of the Power Loom.
1704380146
1704380147
3.Dublin, Women at Work.
1704380148
1704380149
4.Montgomery, Practical Detail.
1704380150
1704380151
5.Zevin, “Growth of Cotton Textile Production.”
1704380152
1704380153
6.This is not true of all technologies.For example, penicillin and small molecule pharmaceuticals often deliver most of their benefit soon after the initial commercialization.Delayed benefits are a feature of technologies where sequential innovation is important, as discussed in Chapter 3.
1704380154
1704380155
7.Rosenberg, “Technological Interdependence”; Hollander, Sources of Increased Efficiency; Nuvolari, “Collective Invention.”
1704380156
1704380157
8.This quip is from Gavin Wright, “Foundations,” paraphrasing the line in the 1954 film version of The Caine Mutiny: “The first thing you’ve got to learn about this ship is that she was designed by geniuses to be run by idiots.”
1704380158
1704380159
9.Mokyr, Gifts of Athena.
1704380160
1704380161
10.Mokyr, Enlightened Economy; Landes, Unbound Prometheus; Allen, British Industrial Revolution.
1704380162
1704380163
11.Mokyr, Enlightened Economy, p.110.
1704380164
1704380165
12.Meisenzahl and Mokyr, “Rate and Direction.”
1704380166
1704380167
13.Wadsworth and Mann, Cotton Trade and Industrial Lancashire.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.704380118e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]