打字猴:1.70008029e+09
1700080290
1700080291 7 条顿骑士团征服普鲁士
1700080292
1700080293 1.The best comprehensive account is that of Karl Lohmeyer, Geschichte von Ost-und Westpreussen,1st Section,2d ed.,1881. The work of A.L. Ewald, The Conquest of Prussia by the Germans(Die Eroberung Preussens durch die Deutschen),four volumes,1882-1886,is based on a variety of sources. The second great rebellion by the Prussians is treated thoroughly and well by Köhler in the second volume of his Development of Military Organization and Conduct of War in the Knightly Period(Entwickelung des Kriegswesens und der Kriegführung in der Ritterzeit).
1700080294
1700080295 2.Whether the remark, from Dusburg or the chronicle of Oliva, that the order numbered 600 lay members in 1239 is reliable cannot be determined.
1700080296
1700080297 8 英格兰箭术与爱德华一世征服威尔士和苏格兰
1700080298
1700080299 1.Slingers, fundibularii, are mentioned in Continuatio Reginonis(Continuation of Regino)for the year 962. Casus Sancti Galli Continuatio(Continuation of the Chronicle of St. Gall),158.
1700080300
1700080301 2.See Jähns, History of the Development of Ancient Offensive Weapons(Entwickelungsgeschichte der alten Trutzwaffen),p.333 ff.
1700080302
1700080303 3.In Jaffé,Regesta pontificum Romanorum(Register of the Roman Popes),p.585,the decision(No.29)reads as follows: “artem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri sub anathemate prohibent.”(“They prohibited, on pain of damnation, the skill of crossbowmen and archers to be exercised against Christians and Catholics.”)On the basis of this Regesta, we find it stated quite often(for example, in Demmin, Military Weapons [Kriegswaffen],2d ed.,p.100,and also Waitz,8:190)that the council had forbidden the use of the crossbow among Christians as too deadly a weapon. Since the sagittarii(archers)are mentioned in a line with the ballistarii(crossbowmen),that cannot possibly have been the intent of the council. In Mansi, Tome 21,p.534,the decision reads as follows: “Artem autem illam mortiferam et Deo odibilem ballistariorum et sagittariorum adversus Christianos et catholicos exerceri de caetero sub anathemate prohibemus.”(“We prohibit, however, on pain of damnation, that deadly skill of crossbowmen and archers, odious to God, to be practiced by another against Christians and Catholics.”)Hefele, Concil. Geschichte, Vol.V,2d ed.,p.442,interprets this as referring to a kind of tournament of competitive shooting at persons. San Marte, p.188,claims that it refers to poisoned arrows and bolts. I prefer Hefele’s interpretation.
1700080304
1700080305 4.Guillemus Brito, Gesta Philippi regis(William the Briton, Deeds of Philip the King),Book II:
1700080306
1700080307 Francigenis nostris illis ignota diebus
1700080308
1700080309 Res erat omnino, quid Balestarius arcus
1700080310
1700080311 Quid Balista foret.
1700080312
1700080313 (In those days, what a Balestarius bow was
1700080314
1700080315 And what a Balista was
1700080316
1700080317 Were completely unknown to our Frenchmen.)
1700080318
1700080319 Has volo, non alia Ricardum morte perire
1700080320
1700080321 Ut qui Francigenis ballistae primitus usum
1700080322
1700080323 Tradidit, ipse suam rem primitus experiatur
1700080324
1700080325 Quamque alios docuit im se vim sentiat artis.
1700080326
1700080327 (I wish that Richard, who first related
1700080328
1700080329 The use of the crossbow to Frenchmen,
1700080330
1700080331 Die by no other death,
1700080332
1700080333 And he should feel the force against himself
1700080334
1700080335 Which he taught to others.)
1700080336
1700080337 5.Köchly and Rüstow, Greek Military Authors(Griechische Kriegsschriftsteller),2:2:37,201.(See Vol.II, p.346.)
1700080338
1700080339 6.The Welsh Wars of Edward I, A Contribution to Medieval Military History based on Original Documents, by John E. Morris, M.A.,formerly of Magdalen College, Oxford. With a map.Oxford at the Clarendon Press,1901.
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70008029e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]