1700080590
1700080591
10.La Curne, Dictionnaire de I’ancien langage français.
1700080592
1700080593
11.As early as in the lex Salica, title 66，para.2，the word is used twice referring to the fraternity of warriors. This singular case, however, no doubt lies outside the history of language development. In the Latin sources and chronicles of the Valois period, the word is still translated by “societas” or “Comitiva.”Du Cange. Bott, p.4.
1700080594
1700080595
A proclamation by King John of 30 April 1351（cited by Guilhiermoz, Origine de la noblesse, p. 251，from Ordonnances des Rois de France，4.69）reads as follows:
1700080596
1700080597
With respect to whatever gens d’armes come in small groups, without master or chief, we desire and order that a worthy knight be sought out and selected by our constable, marshals, masters of crossbowmen, or others to whom he may belong, who is approved by them, to whom a unit of twenty-five or thirty such men at arms will be given and assigned … and we desire that this knight who shall have such a company will have a pennon with his coat of arms and will receive the same pay as a banneret.
1700080598
1700080599
Froissart, ed. Kervyn de Lettenh.，7.80：“At this time the companies were so large in France that one did not know what to do with them.”
1700080600
1700080601
12.Köhler，3：2：116，118，considers that the basis for the formation of the gleves in 1364 was the fact that it was precisely at that time that the knights started the custom of fighting on foot.Consequently, he is surprised that the gleves were also adopted in Germany（1365），since the knights only seldom fought on foot there. His surprise is out of place, since there was no relationship at all between the dismounting of the knights and the formation of the gleves.
1700080602
1700080603
In 3：2：173，Köhler states that there were lances of two horses, three horses, four，five, six, eight, and ten horses.
1700080604
1700080605
Würdinger, Miliary History of Bavaria（Kriegsgeschichte von Bayern），1：102，states: “The number of men forming a gleve varied. In Swabia there were four horses（Jäger, Ulm，1：418），in Nuremberg two horses to one spear（Ulman Stromer，45），in Strasbourg five horses to one gleve（Schaab，2：277），in Ratisbon one spear and one marksman with three saddle horses（reg.boica，10.303）. It might almost seem that the spear first got the meaning of” lance “or gleve as a result of its combination with one marksman.”Other examples are to be found in Arnold, Constitutional History of the German Free Cities（Verfassungsgeschichte der deutschen freistädte），2：239. Vischer, Studies in German History（Forschungen zur deutschen Geschichte），2：77. Fischer, note, p.385. Köhler，3：2：117，173.
1700080606
1700080607
When the chronicles report, as, for example, Königshofen on Döffingen, that an army had 800 gleves and 2，000 foot soldiers, that gives the impression that the 800 gleves are nothing more than 800 heavy horsemen. But then we also find cases of counting by “helmets” and that there were three horsemen to each “helmet.”Chr. F. Stälin, Württembergische Geschichte，3：321.
1700080608
1700080609
In 1381 the cities formed a league army of 1，400 spears and 500 foot soldiers. For this force Augsburg provided forty-eight hastatos（spearmen），thirty sagittarios equites（mounted archers），and 300 pedites armatos（armed foot soldiers）. Würdinger，1：93. See also pp.96 and 98 of the same work.
1700080610
1700080611
Fischer states in Participation of the Free Cities in the Imperial Army March to Italy（Teilnahme der Reichsstädte an der Reichsheerfahrt），p.30，that in 1310 at the imperial diet in Speyer a roster was drawn up showing how many gleves each free city was to provide for the march to Rome, each gleve having three horses, that is, three horsemen. This would therefore indicate that the concept and name of the gleve already existed in Germany in 1310 . Nevertheless, this conclusion is subject to question, since the numbers are from a much later period, and the decision of 1310 may have been worded differently.
1700080612
1700080613
Morris, The Welsh Wars, p. 80，claims that in England the combining of the various combat arms into units was first seen at the siege of Dunbar in 1337. Previously, to include the reign of Edward I, the various combat arms appeared as separate units.
1700080614
1700080615
Cosneau, p. 358，note, states that the English had three marksmen in each lance. He gives an example in which two men-at-arms and two marksmen formed all together a group of nine men and nine horses.
1700080616
1700080617
13.Cosneau, p.357. The ordinance of Luppé-le-Chastel of 26 May 1445 is reproduced on p.610. This shows the lance as consisting of one knight, one coutillier, one page, two marksmen, one serving man, and six horses.
1700080618
1700080619
14.We find used very often the formula “‘ban et arrière-ban’（‘vassals and subvassals’）were levied.”
1700080620
1700080621
According to Guilhiermoz, p. 294，the “arrière-ban” in France was originally the same thing as the Landwehr（militia）in Germany, that is, the general levy of all men capable of bearing arms. He says that the feudal service was later limited to the “arrière-ban” and the “arrière-ban” was limited to men holding fiefs.
1700080622
1700080623
Boutaric, p. 140 f.，reports in detail on the conditions that were issued on the levy under Louis IX and were specified in numerous “coutumes”（customs）. They limited the rights of the lord to an extreme degree. He was allowed to levy his men only for defense, or only in the region governed by the lord, or only so far as to allow the man to return home on the same evening.
1700080624
1700080625
Luce, Bertrand du Guesclin, p. 159，recounts that, according to an unpublished ordinance, on 17 May 1355 King John called up “the ban et I’arrière-ban, that is to say, all physically qualified men between the ages of eighteen and sixty.” That can hardly have been the intention of the ordinance, and Luce himself believes that the French communes did not obey this order. When Luce adds that Edward III in England really gave the arrière-ban “a truly practical character” by having all his subjects carry out weapons training, that is also an error.
1700080626
1700080627
15.In addition to the references already cited, see Spont，“La Milice des francs-archers，”Revue des questions historiques, Vol.61.
1700080628
1700080629
16.Boutaric, Institutions militaires de la France, p.218. Jähns, Handbuch, p.759. According to Juvénal des Ursins and the Monk of Saint Denis. The latter author states that the people carried out the drills with great zeal.
1700080630
1700080631
17.The military system of Charles the Bold is treated excellently by M. Guillaume，“Histoire de l’organisation militaire sous les dues de Bourgogne，” in the Mémoires couronnés et mémoires des savants étrangers publiés par l’Académie de Belgique, Vol.22，Brussels，1848. Much valuable material is also to be found in La Chauvelays, La Composition des armées de Charles le Téméraire，1879. In the Mémoires de I’Académie de Dijon, Tome VI.（also published in Paris as a separate edition）. I have discussed it myself in my Perser-und Burgunderkriege.
1700080632
1700080633
18.In 1340 the count of Armagnac had only 300 fully equipped men-at-arms in a force of 800（Grande chronique de St. Denys，5：393，ed. Paulin）.
1700080634
1700080635
In 1429 the noblemen who reinforced Charles VII“did not have the means of arming themselves or providing themselves with mounts.”（Chronique de la Pucelle, Panthéon littéraire, p.442）.
1700080636
1700080637
In 1467 Charles the Bold selected, from the vassals who had been levied, those who had full equipment; they numbered 400 of the total group of 1，400. But it happened that the nobles took their pay and rode back home（according to Guillaume, p.89）.
1700080638
1700080639
19.Lachauvelays, p.170，estimates that the two Burgundies provided Charles the Bold with thirty-two companies of soudoyers à gages ménagers.
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.70008059e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]