1701503699
1701503700
(76) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 72.
1701503701
1701503702
(77) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 80.
1701503703
1701503704
(78) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 159.
1701503705
1701503706
(79) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 113, 150—151.
1701503707
1701503708
(80) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 113.
1701503709
1701503710
(81) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 114.
1701503711
1701503712
(82) 斯梅尔对先天与后天二分法的反对，见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 118。
1701503713
1701503714
(83) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 139—140.
1701503715
1701503716
(84) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 117.
1701503717
1701503718
(85) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 115.
1701503719
1701503720
(86) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 161.
1701503721
1701503722
(87) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 127.
1701503723
1701503724
(88) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 155.
1701503725
1701503726
(89) “除此之外，我们对每天刺激我们情绪和感情的机制变得麻木，这种神经化学的不敏感性可能有助于解释为什么这十年的兴奋点再过十年可能会变得无聊。”见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 188。
1701503727
1701503728
(90) 斯梅尔写道：“像海洛因和可卡因这样的毒品之所以会吸引一些人，是因为它们模仿了大脑中5-羟色胺和多巴胺的作用，可以人为地改变身体状态。”见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 151。
1701503729
1701503730
(91) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 137.
1701503731
1701503732
(92) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 118, 128, 155, 161, 175, 180, 182.
1701503733
1701503734
(93) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 166—167.
1701503735
1701503736
(94) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 174.
1701503737
1701503738
(95) Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 186.
1701503739
1701503740
(96) Daniel M. Gross, The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 34.
1701503741
1701503742
(97) William M. Reddy, “Neuroscience and the Fallacies of Functionalism”, History and Theory , 49/3 (2010), 412—425, here 414—415.
1701503743
1701503744
(98) 关于人类起源于非洲，见Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain , 9—10, 15。
1701503745
1701503746
(99) Dror Wahrmann, “Where Culture and Biology Meet”, review of Daniel Lord Smail, On Deep History and the Human Brain (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008), in Haaretz (24 April 2008)．我要感谢伊格尔· 哈尔芬让我注意到这篇评论。
1701503747
1701503748
(100) Markus Völkel, “Wohin führt der ‘neuronal turn’ die Geschichtswissenschaft?”, in Christian Geyer (ed.), Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit: Zur Deutung der neuesten Experimente (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004), 140—142, here 140．又见Christian Geyer, “Frieds Brainstorming
:Jetzt ist auch die Geschichte aufs Gehirn gekommen”, in Geyer, Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit , 134—139; Alexander Kraus and Birte Kohtz, “Hirnwindungen—Quelle einer historiographischen Wende? Zur Relevanz neurowissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse für die Geschichtswissenschaft”,Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft , 55/10 (2007), 842—857; Michael L. Fitzhugh and William H. Leckie, Jr,“Agency, Postmodernism, and the Causes of Change”, History and Theory , 40/4 (2001), 59—81。关于能动性和生命科学方法见特刊“The Return of Science: Evolutionary Ideas and History”, History and Theory 38/4 (1999)；还有特刊“Agency after Postmodernism”,History and Theory , 40/4 (2001); Gabrielle M. Spiegel (ed.), Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn (New York: Routledge, 2005)。
[
上一页 ]
[ :1.701503699e+09 ]
[
下一页 ]