打字猴:1.70457386e+09
1704573860 26 Adams v. Urseil(1913)l Ch.269.
1704573861
1704573862 27 Andreae v.Selfridgeand Company Ltd(193^8)1 Ch,1.
1704573863
1704573864 28 John Anthony Hardinge Giffard,3rd Earl of Halsbury,ed,“Public Authorities and Public Officers,”Halsbury’s Laws of England,vol.30,3rd ed(London:Butterworth,1960),690—691.
1704573865
1704573866 29 See Prosser,Law of Torts,421;Harper and Jamest Law of Torts,86—87.
1704573867
1704573868 30 Delta Air Corporation v. Kersey,Kersey v. City of Altanta,Supreme Court of Georgia,193Ga.862,20S.E. 2d 245(1942).
1704573869
1704573870 31 Thrasher v. City of Atlanta,178 Ga. 514,173 S.E. 817(1934).
1704573871
1704573872 32 Georgia Railroad and Banking Go. v. Maddox,116 Ga. 64,42 S.E.315(1902).
1704573873
1704573874 33 Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.270 Mass.511,170 N.E.385,390(1930).
1704573875
1704573876 34 See Sir Alfred Denning,Freedom Under the Law(London:Stevens,1949),71.
1704573877
1704573878 35 Mary B .Cairns,The Law of Tortin Local Govermnent(London:Shaw,1945),28—32.
1704573879
1704573880 36 A.C.Pigou,The Economics of Welfare 183(4th ed.1932).我的引用都来自第4版,但本文中所引用的观点和例子从1920年的第1版到1932年的第4版都没有变动。分析的大部分内容(不是全部)在以前的《财富与福利》(Wealth and Welfare,London:Macmillan Co.,1912)一书中已经出现。
1704573881
1704573882 37 同上书。
1704573883
1704573884 38 同上书,127—130。
1704573885
1704573886 39 在《财富与福利》一书中,庇古将“乐观主义”归之于亚当•斯密本人而不是其追随者。他在那里提到,“在需求和供给既定的情形下,亚当•斯密高度的乐观主义的理论是,国民资金会趋向于‘自然’达到最大值”(第104页)。
1704573887
1704573888 40 Pigou,Economics of Welfare,129—130.
1704573889
1704573890 41 同上书,134。
1704573891
1704573892 42 参见HaLsbury,Laws of England,vol.31,474—475,关于法律立场的概要和所有引语均出自这里。
1704573893
1704573894 43 见152Pari. Deb.,H.C.2622—2663(1992),161 ParL. Deb.,H.C. 2935—2955(1923)。
1704573895
1704573896 44 Vaughan v. Taff Vale Railway Co. 3 H. And N. 743(EX.1858)and 5 H. and N.679(Ex. I860).
1704573897
1704573898 45 Dennis Robertson. Lectures on Economic Principles,Vol.1(London:Staples Press,1957),162.
1704573899
1704573900 46 E.J.Mishan,“The Meaning of Efficiency in Economics,”The Bankers’ Magazine 189(June1960):482.
1704573901
1704573902 47 Pigou,Economics of Welfare,184.
1704573903
1704573904 48 同上书,185—186。
1704573905
1704573906 49 同上书,186,n.1。类似不到位的论述可参见Pigou’s lecture“Some Aspects of the Housing Problems”in B.S. Rowntree and A.C. Pigou,Lectures on Howsmg(Manchester:University Press,1914)。
1704573907
1704573908 50 见Glanville L.Williams,Liability for Animals—An Account of the Development and Present Law of Tortious Liability for Animals,Distress Damage Feasantand the Dutyto Fence,in Great Britain,Northern Ireland and the Common-law Dominions(Cambridge,Eng.:Cambridge University Press,1939)。Part Four,“The Action of Nuisance,in Relation to Liability for Animals,99236—262。以上论著与我们的讨论尤为密切。我不知道在动物责任上,美国有关的普通法与英国的相差多大。在美国的西部各州,英国关于栅栏的普通法并没有得到遵守,部分原因是“相当多的未开垦土地供牛群自由蹓越是符合公共政策的”(Williams op.cit supra 227)。这需要有一个很好的例子说明,不同的环境集合会怎样使关于权利界定的法律规则的改变,在经济上是可欲的。
1704573909
[ 上一页 ]  [ :1.70457386e+09 ]  [ 下一页 ]